It is currently September 23rd, 2017, 8:13 pm

All times are UTC-07:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next
Author Message
Unread postPosted: February 5th, 2017, 11:11 pm 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1046
Quote:
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.


more at link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z4Xt0ei1y9

I have always thought the way they conveniently found ways to make the 15 year global warming hiatus disappear, looked awfully suspsicious.

---

related article

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/ ... fake-data/


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 12:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2016, 6:51 pm
Posts: 3306
Yeah Right wrote:
Quote:
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.


more at link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z4Xt0ei1y9

I have always thought the way they conveniently found ways to make the 15 year global warming hiatus disappear, looked awfully suspsicious.

---

related article

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/ ... fake-data/

And who pays for this? The working man and woman in Countries like Canada.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 12:23 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
This bullshit article has been debunked.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 12:36 pm 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1046
iron horse jockey wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
Quote:
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.


more at link

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... z4Xt0ei1y9

I have always thought the way they conveniently found ways to make the 15 year global warming hiatus disappear, looked awfully suspsicious.

---

related article

https://realclimatescience.com/2017/02/ ... fake-data/

And who pays for this? The working man and woman in Countries like Canada.


yep that's the politicians for you. rather than admit they want to raise taxes for greedy government. They tell you they are wonderful and noble and only want the money to "save the earth" and then they stick it to everyone to fund their out of control spending.

Every pickpocket needs a good ruse to distract you while they steel your wallet.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 12:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: November 17th, 2012, 4:01 pm
Posts: 6589
RW wrote:
This bullshit article has been debunked.

Not by Dr. John Bates himself who blew the whistle. He is sticking to the Karl study being used “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.” That is what he told U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology members.

The theory of AGW is still very sound. But, we cannot deny that some deliberate dishonesty has taken place over the years within the scientific community to make the warming trend appear more severe than it actually is. There is a lot of money in climate alarmism.

_________________
A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers. Friedrich August von Hayek


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 12:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
You realise this isn't being covered by mainstream media right? A story that big would get coverage.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:05 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 1st, 2016, 6:51 pm
Posts: 3306
seoulbro wrote:
RW wrote:
This bullshit article has been debunked.

Not by Dr. John Bates himself who blew the whistle. He is sticking to the Karl study being used “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.” That is what he told U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology members.

The theory of AGW is still very sound. But, we cannot deny that some deliberate dishonesty has taken place over the years within the scientific community to make the warming trend appear more severe than it actually is. There is a lot of money in climate alarmism.

That man has got guts and integrity. Watch other scientists at the NOAA try and discredit him. Climate scientists who reveal their dirty secrets are quickly ostracized.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2012, 8:21 pm
Posts: 7984
RW wrote:
You realise this isn't being covered by mainstream media right? A story that big would get coverage.

That goes to the point of what is wrong in our society

NO story countering the MSM' pet agendas / holy grails get's covered .... I had thought that point had already been well "covered" .. not to mention obvious to open eyes

_________________
So WHY would we deliberately bring in an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... only to then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:15 pm 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1046
seoulbro wrote:
RW wrote:
This bullshit article has been debunked.

Not by Dr. John Bates himself who blew the whistle. He is sticking to the Karl study being used “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.” That is what he told U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology members.

The theory of AGW is still very sound. But, we cannot deny that some deliberate dishonesty has taken place over the years within the scientific community to make the warming trend appear more severe than it actually is. There is a lot of money in climate alarmism.


Obviously you know a lot about this SB, so a question if you don't mind--

There was, at least initially, an observed warming hiatus from 1998 to 2013. For a long time it was out there, without explnation, and then suddenly the climate people made it disappear, and instead of hiatus years they decided those were warming years. Doesn't that seem just a little too convenient?

BTW just for the record I am a climate change agnostic.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
cc wrote:
RW wrote:
You realise this isn't being covered by mainstream media right? A story that big would get coverage.

NO story countering the MSM' pet agendas / holy grails get's covered .... I had thought that point had already been well "covered" .. not to mention obvious to open eyes

cc, that's just not true.

Is the Daily Mail not a tabloid because it sure as shit looks like one.

Now if you were a leading climate scientist with something important to say, why wouldn't you approach a REPUTABLE news agency to cover your whistle blowing?

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
Oh, here we are...

"The Daily Mail is a British daily middle-market tabloid newspaper owned by the Daily Mail and General Trust and published in London."

I thought it was rather "obvious to open eyes" that tabloids are utter garbage.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 6:31 pm
Posts: 4301
Location: Vancouver
Quote:
More fake news in ‘The Mail on Sunday’

An attack by the ‘The Mail on Sunday’ on the accuracy and integrity of a recent paper on global warming is based on inaccurate and misleading claims, including a fake graph.

London School of Economics and Political Science

http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/news/more-fake-news-in-the-mail-on-sunday/


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:25 pm 
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2012, 8:21 pm
Posts: 7984
My comment was ONLY on the MSM ... I made NO mention of any other media
Your reply indicated you again did not read it before replying to it

Here's a today fun one - hags opposing T

Image

The CIA pic is of a fellow who died some time ago

_________________
So WHY would we deliberately bring in an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... only to then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
I would worry if there wasn't dissension in scientific study and publication.

What I object to is people getting information from tabloids and pretending it's real.

BE MORE DILIGENT PEOPLE. The bullshit machine is in full swing.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:27 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
cc wrote:
My comment was ONLY on the MSM ... I made NO mention of any other media
Your reply indicated you again did not read it before replying to it

Here's a today fun one - those opposing T

Image

The CIA pic is of a fellow who died some time ago

Oh cc, I love to dance but not with people who trip over themselves.

I clarified the story in the OP was from a tabloid. It's not being covered by mainstream media because it's bird cage liner.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2012, 8:21 pm
Posts: 7984
There we go again .... no read, post anyhow. slip in an insult ... I so hate having to quote myself, but seems necessary to keep misquoting within limits
and my point still is
Quote:
NO story countering the MSM' pet agendas / holy grails get's covered .... I had thought that point had already been well "covered" .. not to mention obvious to open eyes
Nowhere did I mention media other than the fake agenda - driven MSM

_________________
So WHY would we deliberately bring in an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... only to then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:39 pm 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1046
This happens all the time. Conservative newspapers and radio people talked for several months about Obama's pastor jermiah Wright before ABC picked it up and then it was everywhere.

the MSM often ignores stories they don't like, with the hopes they will go away. They pay attenion when they become too big to ignore.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
cc wrote:
There we go again .... no read, post anyhow. slip in an insult ... I so hate having to quote myself, but seems necessary to keep misquoting within limits
and my point still is
Quote:
NO story countering the MSM' pet agendas / holy grails get's covered .... I had thought that point had already been well "covered" .. not to mention obvious to open eyes
Nowhere did I mention media other than the fake agenda - driven MSM

Thanks for having me re-read your post. I am still making the point that the daily is a TABLOID and that it's obvious it's a TABLOID and that you cannot trust information you get from a TABLOID. I'm still making this point even if you are only talking about MSN (which I wasn't).

Kk?

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2012, 8:21 pm
Posts: 7984
and Jermiah Wrong's traitorous teachings ran the White House for 8 years, yet good old Jerry never was mentioned again

by the FAKE NEWS and / of Never Mention details that do not support its agendas Mainstream Media

_________________
So WHY would we deliberately bring in an inherently violent / supremacist / misogynist / counter-to-democracy IDEOLOGY .... only to then have to monitor its devout followers 24/7/365? :crazy:
Someone, anyone, remind me WHY we would do that.


Top
Unread postPosted: February 6th, 2017, 1:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22297
Yeah Right wrote:
This happens all the time. Conservative newspapers and radio people talked for several months about Obama's pastor jermiah Wright before ABC picked it up and then it was everywhere.

the MSM often ignores stories they don't like, with the hopes they will go away. They pay attenion when they become too big to ignore.

I look forward to reading it in mainstream media when it comes out. Until then, it's tabloid fodder.

_________________
"Self-deception has repeatedly served as a bedrock of cruelty."
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 Next

All times are UTC-07:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
phpBB SEO
[ GZIP: On | Load: 13.86 ]