It is currently November 23rd, 2017, 6:33 am

All times are UTC-08:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 498 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 525 Next
Author Message
Unread postPosted: December 21st, 2016, 9:26 pm 

Joined: October 19th, 2012, 4:26 pm
Posts: 1714
I've been often criticized for bashing the right, so here's a recent news story bashing the Left.

In todays online version of the New York Times, there was a story which appeared out of North Carolina about a Republican state government which passed a bill restricting access of LGBTQ individuals to the bathroom of their choice. Specifically the law known as bill 2 restricts people to use washrooms according to the gender on their birth certificate, not their preferred gender. This has gotten the state into a lot of hot water as various celebrities have cancelled visits to the state, it has lost funding, sporting events have been cancelled, etc. And the outgoing Republican governor who lost the recent election has not made good on his previous promise to repeal this law.

Thing is, does the state of North Carolina owe the LGBTQ community anything? Or is this a case of the latter refusing to make any compromises of its own? If this community wishes to have unimpeded access to public washrooms, why don't they just seek public funding to build their own damn washrooms, a restroom for the 3rd kind? I think they have these in various community centres in Vancouver, Canada. They're known as 'gender neutral' washrooms. If it works in Vancouver, it'd probably work in North Carolina too. However, if efforts were established to create a facility for our friends of the 3rd kind, maybe the state would be accused of 'segregation'.

Y'know, these controversies never end. The state could give these groups anything and everything to accommodate them and they'd still be bitching whining and complaining. Anyways what do you think should be done? Build a 3rd washroom for these types? Or allow transgender types into Ladies washrooms.

BTW, the title of the NYT story was called 'North Carolina Fails to Repeal Bathroom Law Limiting Access'. You can look it up in Todays New York Times online edition.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 21st, 2016, 11:34 pm 
User avatar

Joined: April 24th, 2015, 7:57 pm
Posts: 9782
A rest room labelled "?" is widely used in Sydney, and has been for nearly 50 years.

The LGBT community amount to what, 5% of the total population?

Its time we stopped bending over backwards for these tiny groups is gong beaters who make a lot of noise over nothing.

They can piss in each others pockets, for a change.

_________________
“And now you'll be telling stories of my coming back and they won't be false, and they won't be true but they'll be real”


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 8:54 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
Oberon wrote:
A rest room labelled "?" is widely used in Sydney, and has been for nearly 50 years.

The LGBT community amount to what, 5% of the total population?

Its time we stopped bending over backwards for these tiny groups is gong beaters who make a lot of noise over nothing.

They can piss in each others pockets, for a change.


Its even lower than that if you just look at the T part of LGBT that is affected by the bathroom stuff -- .3% of the population, so basically 3 people out of a thousand that we all have to bend over backwards for.

And Joe is right that it reveals the lefts extremism. When the left won on gay marriage they were not content. They decided it was time to force people to cater and photograph gay weddings. And then they started this retarded bathroom stuff. Both of which are typical of them, trampling all over majority rights in the name of minorities.

There are probably some decent solutions like a one occupant bathroom for anyone. But grown men changing next to 8 year old girls is not a good one, and is a blatant trampling of majority rights.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:06 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Bend over backwards for? Let them use the bathroom they want. Problem solved. Instead you rightard idiots have made it a legislated issue.

*facepalm*

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:34 am 
User avatar

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 6:31 pm
Posts: 4301
Location: Vancouver
JOE wrote:
Y'know, these controversies never end. The state could give these groups anything and everything to accommodate them and they'd still be bitching whining and complaining.

These controversies never end? Yet you know it was the Republican state government that started this controversy.

Give these groups anything and everything? You know the bill is restricting access.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:41 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
But what about when it comes to changing rooms and showers? Do you really think grown men should be allowed to shower and change with 8 year old girls?

Also because of the screwy leftist definition--any man who thinks he's a woman is a woman :001_rolleyes: - you are inviting sex offenders and peeping toms into women's changing rooms, and rest rooms. (which is exactly what happened when Target annmounced they were going to let men in the women's room)

This is a typical liberalism, trampling on majorities rights all over the place, and making a ridiculous mess in the process.

fail :negative:


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 6:31 pm
Posts: 4301
Location: Vancouver
It's not about grown men being allowed to shower and change with girls. It's not about men "thinking" they're a woman.

The vast majority of sex offenders are heterosexual males.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:48 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Yeah Right wrote:
But what about when it comes to changing rooms and showers? Do you really think grown men should be allowed to shower and change with 8 year old girls?

Also because of the screwy leftist definition--any man who thinks he's a woman is a woman :001_rolleyes: - you are inviting sex offenders and peeping toms into women's changing rooms, and rest rooms.

This is a typical liberalism, trampling on majorities rights all over the place, and making a ridiculous mess in the process.

fail :negative:

We aren't talking about change rooms but if you want to be particular, a lot of recreation centres with pools have family change rooms where little kids are running around the same space as dads and moms.

We also aren't talking about peeing toms and sex offenders. We are talking about people who are gender misidentified or transgendered. It's where their brains say they are the opposite sex. They dress and carry themselves as the sex they feel rather than what they have between their legs. We are also talking about bathroom use. I don't know about your bathrooms, but there isn't a bevy of tits, ass and vagina in the ladies' room.

This is typical rightard fear mongering to trample on the rights of minorities. Equating transgendered people to sex offenders is not only incredibly stupid, it's incorrect.

Why can't you people educate yourselves rather than wallowing in ignorance? Is it really that hard?

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 9:51 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
Romero wrote:
It's not about grown men being allowed to shower and change with girls. It's not about men "thinking" they're a woman.

The vast majority of sex offenders are heterosexual males.


You completely missed the point--

According to the leftist definition-- any man who feels like they are a woman (and there is no way to test whether they really feel that way or are pretending) can walk into any women's room, or women's changing room and take off their clothes in front of female children, and/or watch female children take off their clothes as well.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:00 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Yeah Right wrote:
Romero wrote:
It's not about grown men being allowed to shower and change with girls. It's not about men "thinking" they're a woman.

The vast majority of sex offenders are heterosexual males.


You completely missed the point--

According to the leftist definition-- any man who feels like they are a woman (and there is no way to test whether they really feel that way or are pretending) can walk into any women's room, or women's changing room and take off their clothes in front of female children, and/or watch female children take off their clothes as well.

Really? Change room? I hadn't heard that one.

How do you know that the current men and women in bathrooms and changerooms are actually men and women? If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, how do you know it's really a duck? You don't so get your dumbass out of people's panties.

It's a bathroom FFS.

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:05 am 
User avatar

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 6:31 pm
Posts: 4301
Location: Vancouver
Yeah Right wrote:
You completely missed the point--

According to the leftist definition-- any man who feels like they are a woman (and there is no way to test whether they really feel that way or are pretending) can walk into any women's room, or women's changing room and take off their clothes in front of female children, and/or watch female children take off their clothes as well.

Where are you getting this "leftist definition" from? Only from yourself. It's your definition. Some pretty sick thoughts you got there.


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:21 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Romero wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
You completely missed the point--

According to the leftist definition-- any man who feels like they are a woman (and there is no way to test whether they really feel that way or are pretending) can walk into any women's room, or women's changing room and take off their clothes in front of female children, and/or watch female children take off their clothes as well.

Where are you getting this "leftist definition" from? Only from yourself. It's your definition. Some pretty sick thoughts you got there.

Definition aside, that's not even the issue. The issue is bathrooms not changerooms. These hysterical rightards get going and things become ridiculous!

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:27 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
Now here come the inevitable ad hominem fallacies from those losing the argument. typical

Here's a question-- if a 25 y.o. guy puts on a wig but still looks nothing like a woman and wants to use the women's changing room/bathroom, is he a legitimate transgender or not?


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:32 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Yeah Right wrote:
Now here come the inevitable ad hominem fallacies from those losing the argument. typical

Here's a question if a 40 y.o. guy puts on a wig but still looks nothing like a woman and wants to use the women's changing room, is he a legitimate transgender or not?

Unless he's legitimately transgender, then no.

To put it into perspective, a guy could do that now just as a woman could put on men's clothes and walk into a men's room.

Now what do you think would happen if a guy who is dressed like a woman walks into a men's room or a woman dressed like a man walks into a women's room?

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:38 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Which bathroom should the following people use?

1. Image

2. Image

3. Image

4. Image

5. Image

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:42 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
RW wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
Now here come the inevitable ad hominem fallacies from those losing the argument. typical

Here's a question if a 40 y.o. guy puts on a wig but still looks nothing like a woman and wants to use the women's changing room, is he a legitimate transgender or not?

Unless he's legitimately transgender, then no.


Now we're finally getting somewhere.

Okay, so put yourself in this scenario

you are a security person at Walmart or some other major store. A woman in the women's room screams "there's a guy in here get him out"

How do you, the security guard, determine of the man in the womens room is a legitimately transgendered person that should be allowed to stay or a fraud that should be expelled from the restroom? What criteria will you use?

Now remember your job may be on the line here, and the company you work for may get sued over this so you better get it right. So what do you do?


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:46 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
Yeah Right wrote:
RW wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
Now here come the inevitable ad hominem fallacies from those losing the argument. typical

Here's a question if a 40 y.o. guy puts on a wig but still looks nothing like a woman and wants to use the women's changing room, is he a legitimate transgender or not?

Unless he's legitimately transgender, then no.


Now we're finally getting somewhere.

Okay, so put yourself in this scenario

you are a security person at Walmart or some other major store. A woman in the women's room screams "there's a guy in here get him out"

How do you, the security guard, determine of the man in the womens room is a legitimately transgendered person that should be allowed to stay or a fraud that should be expelled from the restroom? What criteria will you use?

Now remember your job may be on the line here, and the company you work for may get sued over this so you better get it right. So what do you do?

You talk to the person like a human being but perhaps the solution would be to have identification reflect the person's gender status. Like your driver's license or other ID says T rather than M or F?

But see the thread above. Tell me which bathroom each of those people should use.

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:49 am 
User avatar

Joined: October 4th, 2012, 6:31 pm
Posts: 4301
Location: Vancouver
According to the ACTUAL rightist definition, because it has been well publicized and even made into law, people like Yeah Right wants this MAN using women's bathrooms and change rooms:

Image


Top
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:58 am 

Joined: January 27th, 2014, 12:36 pm
Posts: 22730
This is definitely a case of when the RIGHT goes too far.

_________________
Beware of Gaslighters!


Top
   
Unread postPosted: December 22nd, 2016, 10:58 am 

Joined: September 11th, 2016, 8:33 am
Posts: 1045
RW wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
RW wrote:
Yeah Right wrote:
Now here come the inevitable ad hominem fallacies from those losing the argument. typical

Here's a question if a 40 y.o. guy puts on a wig but still looks nothing like a woman and wants to use the women's changing room, is he a legitimate transgender or not?

Unless he's legitimately transgender, then no.


Now we're finally getting somewhere.

Okay, so put yourself in this scenario

you are a security person at Walmart or some other major store. A woman in the women's room screams "there's a guy in here get him out"

How do you, the security guard, determine of the man in the womens room is a legitimately transgendered person that should be allowed to stay or a fraud that should be expelled from the restroom? What criteria will you use?

Now remember your job may be on the line here, and the company you work for may get sued over this so you better get it right. So what do you do?

You talk to the person like a human being but perhaps the solution would be to have identification reflect the person's gender status. Like your driver's license or other ID says T rather than M or F?

But see the thread above. Tell me which bathroom each of those people should use.


oh please, just answer the question already

You are a security guard, you have a woman in the restroom who doesn't want a man in the restroom with her. You are going to either have to let him stay or tell him to leave. If he claims he is transgendered, What method will you use to determine whether the man is legimitately transgendered or not?

it shouldn't be that difficult of a question, why can't you answer it?


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 498 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 525 Next

All times are UTC-08:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
phpBB SEO
[ GZIP: On ]