NO INDICTMENTS - No Collusion - No Nothing - Dreams dashed

[Bricktop]

Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?

[Wazzzup]

Just to show what a joke American media is these days this is an actual headline and actual article from Newsweek Magazine--



As special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation is reportedly coming to an end, elderly and sick Americans are trying to hold on to their lives so they can read the highly-anticipated report that has been nearly two years in the making.

What a Ridiculous POS [/quote]

Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?

 Its supposed to be.  It used to be second only to Time magazine for weekly news magazines.  Several comments on the site said they thought they were reading the onion or other satire.

[Bricktop]

I guess, like all media outlets, they join in the headline click-bait feeding frenzy...so matter how ludicrous and ill conceived it may seem.

[Anonymous]

Is Newsweek a serious media outlet?

Like Wazzzup said, it's a big organization, but so is CNN.

[Gaon]

The full Mueller report is out. I haven't read it. but CNN is spinning it as a basis for the Democrats to impeach Trump.

[Anonymous]

The full Mueller report is out. I haven't read it. but CNN is spinning it as a basis for the Democrats to impeach Trump.

It doesn't matter what's in it. The Dems and their media minions will spin it.

[Bricktop]

The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".

[Anonymous]

The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".

Wazzzup talks a lot about this..



Apparently, it's not just at the federal level either.

[Anonymous]

The damage the American democrats have done to the principle of democracy is in my view irreversible and terminal.



Their conduct is tantamount to a cold coup...trying to overturn the result of an election by any and all means possible short of armed uprising.



Instead of focusing on governing the country for the benefit of the people paying their salary, they are trying to seize political power through coercion and conflict.



Each and every American should look upon these hate filled hyenas and ask..."Is this what we pay them for?".

Wazzzup talks a lot about this..



Apparently, it's not just at the federal level either.

Look at Broward county, Florida. Finding or losing boxes of ballots. A corrupt Democrat scumbag in charge of elections. That's just one corrupt Democratic county.

[Wazzzup]

I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork

Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/ ... pt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are.

[Anonymous]

I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork

Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/ ... pt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are.

I would love to see the tables turned on the Democrats. Go Barr go.

[Anonymous]

I was just thinking as I heard some soundbites of Barr before congress--if he does anything serious like indict people the media and the democrats will smear him (Barr) as the most evil, partisan man that ever lived--looks like they're already laying the groundwork

Well Barr hasn't even indicted anyone yet, and already the demoturds and the media (same thing) are doing that and more--



They've called Barr Trump's lapdog, called for Barr to resign, said he lied to congress (which of course he didn't) called him dangerous, and now they're going to try and hold him in contempt of congress.



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/ ... pt-1302982">https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/06/democrats-prepare-to-hold-william-barr-in-contempt-1302982



Democrats are showing what disgusting totalitarians they are.

I haven't been following the Dems latest antics. I will take a closer look this week.

[Odinson]

They are questioning his skills as a business man based on the 1985-1994 tax reports..



He took overall 1,17 billion dollar losses..





What I know about the business world is that its hardly a smooth ride.



You bankrupt yourself and then you rise again harder and stronger..



You fake it until you make it.

[Anonymous]

The tax return push is a smokescreen. The Dems do not want to fight the 2020 election on the economy.

[Anonymous]

Robert Mueller is a piece of shit. It is up to the GOP to ask him the tough questions he does not want to answer.



https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/22/fitton-mueller-clinton/?utm_medium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/22/fitt ... dium=email">https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/22/fitton-mueller-clinton/?utm_medium=email

Congress Should Stop Wasting Time On Mueller — And Investigate Hillary Clinton's Role In Steel Dossier



Congressional Democrats will finally get an opportunity to put on a public show starring former Special Counsel Robert Mueller when he appears before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.



Mueller was last seen at his May 29 press statement, in which he attacked President Trump by promoting a tenuous theory of obstruction of justice as grounds for impeachment. Mueller, despite the "no collusion, no obstruction" conclusion of his dubious report, smeared the president by presuming him guilty anyway, claiming he was not exonerated and signaled House Democrats to begin impeachment proceedings.



This hearing will give Mueller and the Democrats an opportunity to once again push the "destroy Trump" narrative and jump-start the impeachment process. Mueller's testimony will be geared to that end. Democratic questions will seek to fill in the blanks to preserve Mueller's manufactured reputation for probity. And the mainstream media will be primed — and probably pre-briefed — to drive the point home.



However, unlike at his press statement where he allowed no questions, Mueller will now have to face hard scrutiny from Republicans and honest Democrats about the origins of his investigation, misconduct during the process, and his questionable, sometimes completely erroneous conclusions.



For example, why did Mueller sit on the fact that his team had early-on discovered that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, which was the central question of the entire Russiagate hoax? Were the midterm elections a factor in his delay for exonerating President Trump of Russia collusion?



Why did Mueller continue as special counsel after learning that former FBI Director James Comey broke the law to get him appointed by leaking information from President Trump's FBI files to the New York Times, using a Columbia professor friend of his as a cut-out?



Why did Mueller populate his investigative team almost exclusively with people with obvious political bias against President Trump? What was the role of chief prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who hired many of the conflicted members of the team and who had been spotted at Hillary Clinton's election night party?



Why did Mueller hide from the American people for four months Peter Strzok and Lisa Page's outrageous conduct and flagrant anti-Trump bias, which necessitated they be fired from the investigation? And why did his office quietly delete all the text messages they passed while on his team, going so far as to reformat their government-issued phones?



Did Mueller's office have any contacts with the media, such as leaking information regarding the massive pre-dawn raid on Roger Stone's home, or the inexplicable guns-drawn action at the home of Paul Manafort?



Why didn't Mueller investigate the Steele dossier that was the basis for the Russian collusion hoax? Why didn't Mueller examine contacts between Steele, Fusion GPS employees like Nellie Ohr, and/or members of the Clinton campaign with the sketchy Russian sources who fed the rumors that were the basis of the dossier?



These are important questions since this was the only demonstrable Russian collusion in 2016, as the dossier was the prime vehicle for Russian interference in the election.



Critical questions can also be asked about Mueller's report to the attorney general, 400 pages of rumor, innuendo and noise that boiled down to "no collusion, no obstruction." Why did Mueller withhold information from the report that would have tended to make President Trump look good, such as the fact that Carter Page, far from being a Russian colluder, was in fact an FBI informant against Russia?



What does Mueller make of the fact that United States District Judge Dabney L. Friedrich issued an opinion on July 1 that Mueller did not in fact establish a Kremlin connection to the Internet Research Agency, the Russian organization Mueller claimed ran Moscow's 'active measures' social media campaign in 2016?



Democrats, of course, won't want to ask these hard questions because they are implicated in the scandal. Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff has a history of lying about President Trump's alleged collusion with Russia and has serious ethics problems over mishandling of classified info and irregular communications with anti-Trump witnesses.



But regardless of what Mueller says or doesn't say, it is critical to remember that this entire enterprise was illegitimate from the start. We arrived here largely because of one person — Hillary Clinton. The Clinton campaign paid for a smear operation against Donald Trump using Russian rumors filtered through Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS, and a dossier laundered through the Obama Justice Department and FBI to create a bogus psy-operation that ultimately led to the special counsel. Without Hillary Clinton, and the need to minimize the damage from her email scandal, there would have been no dossier, no FISA spy warrants, no collusion hoax, no special counsel, no coup cabal, no threats of impeachment, and no continued partisan harassment from Congress.



This is rooted in a Clinton campaign operation seeking to create a false narrative that the Russians were conspiring with Donald Trump to rig the 2016 election. But she was the one subverting the American electoral process, with the unprecedented and illicit cooperation of corrupt swamp dwellers in the upper reaches of the Obama administration. And it is important that the sedition be exposed, and Hillary Clinton and the rest be held accountable.



To this end the president should start releasing all the key documents that detail the depth and breadth of the scandal, who was involved in it, and how it unfolded. Attorney General William Barr needs to investigate how the Mueller investigation came about and, in particular, the matter of the manufactured predicate for the unprecedented and troubling mobilization of government resources to spy on the Trump presidential campaign.



Meanwhile, Judicial Watch has over 50 lawsuits to uncover more information, of which over a dozen relate to Mueller himself.  The Democrat circus hearing may boomerang as the "investigation of the investigators" accelerates.