Ok, so this O' Rourke fucker says "hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15s" and thats all ok, but when this guy named Cain says "my AR is ready for you", and all of a sudden hes under FBI investigation, Twitter removed his tweet for inciting violence, and the snowflakes are in an uproar. How is that any different than O' Rourke's threat!? To come take my property! (I dont own an AR btw). How is this any different than "when you pry them from my cold dead hands". Bunch of whiney snowflakes. They like to throw a punch, and then cry when a punch is returned.Quote from: "Blazor"
I think I can help you here.
One is implying that he intends to take someone's property. It's not clear whether or not he intends to do so lawfully, but given he is a politician we can safely assume he intends to introduce legislation that bans certain firearms, and the possess ion of said firearms without a proper licence will lead to confiscation.
The other replies with a warning that he is prepared to resist that confiscation with his firearm, in other words he is threatening to use that firearms in order to maintain his possession. As it is an AR 15, it can safely be deduced that use that firearm is likely to lead to serious injury or death.
So, you see, one is NOT the same as the other. One is a death threat, the other a political position.
It is an interesting feature of the American mentality that equates the taking of property with the taking of life.