Misc News

[Anonymous]

:2r4ml1j_th:

Woman bites testicles off camel



A Florida woman bit the testicles off of a camel at a Lousiana truck stop petting zoo after she entered the pen to get her dog and the animal sat on her, according to The Advocate.



The woman's husband was tossing treats for their dog to retrieve when some of the canine snacks inadvertently ended up in Caspar the camel's pen, the Iberville Parish Sheriff's Office said.



The pooch went into the camel's den to get the treat. The couple followed when the camel sat on the woman. "She said, 'I bit his testicles to get him off of me,'" Iberville Parish Deputy Louis Hamilton Jr. said. "The camel did nothing wrong," Hamilton said, alleging, "(the couple) were aggressive. The camel was just doing its normal routine." The couple was charged with a leash law violation and trespassing.

 

[Anonymous]

This is what  happens when the UN controls "science".



https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2 ... kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA

Danish Academic: U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda



The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.



In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as "climate inaction" might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.



He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.



"That's what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means," he says.



This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.



"If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told 'this is your emission target, it's not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don't fulfil it', then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not," he says.

[Anonymous]

This is what  happens when the UN controls "science".



https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2 ... kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA

Danish Academic: U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda



The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.



In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as "climate inaction" might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.



He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.



"That's what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means," he says.



This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.



"If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told 'this is your emission target, it's not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don't fulfil it', then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not," he says.

The UN has agendas.

[Anonymous]

This is what  happens when the UN controls "science".



https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2 ... kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA

Danish Academic: U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda



The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.



In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as "climate inaction" might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.



He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.



"That's what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means," he says.



This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.



"If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told 'this is your emission target, it's not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don't fulfil it', then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not," he says.

The IPCC's doom and gloom predictions are meant to scare developed countries dickhead leaders like Trudeau to give more of our money to corrupt third world dictatorships.

[Anonymous]

This is what  happens when the UN controls "science".



https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2 ... kr2gUO0IcA">https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/03/danish-academic-u-n-might-use-military-to-enforce-climate-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR3uRW8YOGVHxDMLlB2hakNUZl9Kh4qeJgUyNCKwNG_FimLz0kr2gUO0IcA

Danish Academic: U.N. Might Use Military to Enforce Climate Agenda



The United Nations may resort to military action against states that defy its mandates on global climate action, according to Ole Wæver, a prominent international relations professor at the University of Copenhagen.



In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as "climate inaction" might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.



He believes classifying climate change as a security issue could leave the door open to more extreme policy responses.



"That's what happens when something becomes a security issue, it gets the urgency, the intensity, the priority, which is helpful sometimes, but it also lets the dark forces loose in the sense that it can justify problematic means," he says.



This urgency, he says, could lead to more abrupt – and essentially undemocratic – action at an international level.



"If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told 'this is your emission target, it's not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don't fulfil it', then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not," he says.

I should have posted this in a different thread.

[Anonymous]

Scary shit. The IPCC needs to be defunded.



https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html?fbclid=IwAR2K_IgWDY0MDlSvW0p8nTtlBdNo0gTUh250Fd4fP0_rxOqlqYLg4IebNas">https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030 ... YLg4IebNas">https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html?fbclid=IwAR2K_IgWDY0MDlSvW0p8nTtlBdNo0gTUh250Fd4fP0_rxOqlqYLg4IebNas

The United Nations 2030 Agenda decoded: It's a blueprint for the global enslavement of humanity under the boot of corporate masters



That article references this UN "2030 Agenda" document that pushes a blueprint for so-called "sustainable development" around the world.



This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet. The "goals" of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world's most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.



In the interests of helping wake up humanity, I've decided to translate the 17 points of this 2030 agenda so that readers everywhere can understand what this document is really calling for. To perform this translation, you have to understand how globalists disguise their monopolistic agendas in "feel good" language.

[Anonymous]

Scary shit. The IPCC needs to be defunded.



https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html?fbclid=IwAR2K_IgWDY0MDlSvW0p8nTtlBdNo0gTUh250Fd4fP0_rxOqlqYLg4IebNas">https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030 ... YLg4IebNas">https://www.naturalnews.com/051058_2030_Agenda_United_Nations_global_enslavement.html?fbclid=IwAR2K_IgWDY0MDlSvW0p8nTtlBdNo0gTUh250Fd4fP0_rxOqlqYLg4IebNas

The United Nations 2030 Agenda decoded: It's a blueprint for the global enslavement of humanity under the boot of corporate masters



That article references this UN "2030 Agenda" document that pushes a blueprint for so-called "sustainable development" around the world.



This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet. The "goals" of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world's most powerful globalist corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.



In the interests of helping wake up humanity, I've decided to translate the 17 points of this 2030 agenda so that readers everywhere can understand what this document is really calling for. To perform this translation, you have to understand how globalists disguise their monopolistic agendas in "feel good" language.

The United Nations wants to be nation it would seem.

[Anonymous]

The UN will be the end of sovereign nations. The IPCC will spearhead the drive.

[Anonymous]

St John's Newfoundland

https://i.prcdn.co/img?regionKey=PN%2FHEXNE9A1UeWASJyrgsw%3D%3D">

[Anonymous]

St John's Newfoundland

https://i.prcdn.co/img?regionKey=PN%2FHEXNE9A1UeWASJyrgsw%3D%3D">

Alarmists want that picture erased from the webz.

[Anonymous]

St John's Newfoundland

https://i.prcdn.co/img?regionKey=PN%2FHEXNE9A1UeWASJyrgsw%3D%3D">

Alarmists want that picture erased from the webz.

 

[Anonymous]

It would be cheaper if the city of St John's abandoned the city under the snow and built a new one on top of it rather than trying to clear it all.

[Anonymous]

It would be cheaper if the city of St John's abandoned the city under the snow and built a new one on top of it rather than trying to clear it all.