WTF??? .. Now It's "We Want NO Law & Order" & Now it gets worse

[Anonymous]

The savage has been killed.





https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/us/michael-reinoehl-arrest-portland-shooting.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/us/m ... oting.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/03/us/michael-reinoehl-arrest-portland-shooting.html





"In the Vice interview, Mr. Reinoehl said he had acted in self-defense, believing that he and a friend were about to be stabbed. "I could have sat there and watched them kill a friend of mine of color, but I wasn't going to do that," he said."



What a load of crap..

Yes,  Mr. Reinoehl is a hero.

 :001_rolleyes:

[cc]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-us-police-union-endorses-trump-for-re-election_3488383.html">Largest US Police Union Endorses Trump for Re-Election



The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the largest police union in the United States, announced it is endorsing President Donald Trump, commending him for his calls for law and order in the wake of civil unrest and riots over the summer.



"Public safety will undoubtedly be a main focus for voters in this year's election," FOP President Patrick Yoes said in a statement on Friday. "Look at what the national discourse has focused on for the last six months. President Trump has shown time after time that he supports our law enforcement officers and understands the issues our members face every day."



The FOP is the largest organization of sworn police officers and has more than 355,000 members in 2,100 lodges. The organization unanimously voted to endorse Trump to reelection.

[Anonymous]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-us-police-union-endorses-trump-for-re-election_3488383.html">Largest US Police Union Endorses Trump for Re-Election



The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the largest police union in the United States, announced it is endorsing President Donald Trump, commending him for his calls for law and order in the wake of civil unrest and riots over the summer.



"Public safety will undoubtedly be a main focus for voters in this year's election," FOP President Patrick Yoes said in a statement on Friday. "Look at what the national discourse has focused on for the last six months. President Trump has shown time after time that he supports our law enforcement officers and understands the issues our members face every day."



The FOP is the largest organization of sworn police officers and has more than 355,000 members in 2,100 lodges. The organization unanimously voted to endorse Trump to reelection.

I saw thst. Finally, a union that has it's members backs.

[cc]

Other police unions have done likewise

[Anonymous]

Other police unions have done likewise

Yes, they have. That is looking out for it's members.



IHJ said his union counterpart in the US endorsed Clinton in 2016 and is endorsing Biden this year. This is despite Biden's opposition to oil, LNG and coal production which trains haul.

[Anonymous]

BLM aint about racial justice.

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/117337532_3243574742403423_1857629847396036452_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=fN-yTtOSEVkAX917KGM&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=40cce207b2f10747b8cb0642994ba6d0&oe=5F78EBBF">

[cc]

https://www.foxnews.com/world/far-left-protesters-uk-printing-presses-stopping-newspaper-deliveries">Far-left protesters blockade UK printing presses, stopping newspaper deliveries



Activists locked themselves onto trucks and scaffolding.



Environmental activists blockaded two British printing presses Saturday, preventing a number of newspapers being delivered -- a move that drew criticism from across the political spectrum and was condemned by Prime Minister Boris Johnson as "completely unacceptable."



Dozens of activists belonging to Extinction Rebellion targeted printworks in Broxbourne, north of London and Knowsley in northwest England. They locked themselves to trucks and erected bamboo scaffolding outside the presses, blocking roads out of the facilities.



[Of course there is no antifa thugs flown in to help  :001_rolleyes: ]

[Anonymous]

Amazon is moving 10,000 jobs out of Seattle to neighbouring Bellevue. Nobody wants to live and work in a lawless hell hole.

[Anonymous]

It was premeditated murder.



Police Suggest Michael Reinoehl Tracked Trump Supporter Before Fatal Shooting

https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/05/michael-reinoehl-antifa-portland-murder/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=hvBsreICDwONpeKYEfBqKJ6oNWmLVnZBkO0HK1.Q">https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/05/mich ... ZBkO0HK1.Q">https://dailycaller.com/2020/09/05/michael-reinoehl-antifa-portland-murder/?utm_source=piano&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2360&pnespid=hvBsreICDwONpeKYEfBqKJ6oNWmLVnZBkO0HK1.Q

The district attorney in Portland released police records on Friday regarding the investigation into Michael Forest Reinoehl, the Antifa supporter suspected of murdering a member of the group Patriot Prayer.



Reinoehl faced a second-degree murder charge for the shooting, the records show. He was killed during an altercation with federal authorities on Thursday.



Police records show Reinoehl sought a gun from his son early last month, saying that he was "getting tired of this shit."

Video footage cited in a police affidavit shows Reinoehl following his alleged victim, Aaron Danielson.

[Anonymous]

According to Vicky Osterweil, owning property or a business is inherently racist.



By Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast



Despite author's claims, there's no defence for looting



"Looting is a highly racialized word from its very inception in the English language," Osterweil said in the NPR interview. "It's taken from Hindi, lut, which means 'goods' or 'spoils.'"



How this is relevant, or even evidence that the word is "racialized," is a mystery given that maybe two in 10 million people know its etymology. Other words with Hindi origins: pundit, guru, khaki, cashmere and pajamas. The horror.



This is a good example of confusing words and things. Looting — mobs grabbing stuff that doesn't belong to them — is an ancient practice dating back hundreds of thousands of years, before we even had the concept of dates. Pillaging, ransacking, theft — call it what you like — is how tribes acquired stuff before the invention of trade.



In short: Osterweil thinks she's making some powerful neo-Marxist argument on the bleeding edge of theory, but what she's discovered is tribal barbarism and put a fresh coat of paint on it.



She is fluent in all the latest buzzwords and campus jargon. The "so-called" United States of America, she writes in her book, was founded in "cisheteropatriarchal racial capitalist" violence. (I'm getting my quotes from Graeme Wood's excellent review in The Atlantic, as I have no desire to saddle Osterweil with the guilt of profiting from her work.)



Destroying businesses is an "experience of pleasure, joy and freedom," she writes. Osterweil also insists it's a form of "queer birth," and that "riots are violent, extreme and femme as f---." Looting isn't wrong, she claims, but rather a form of "proletarian shopping."



"Looting strikes at the heart of property, of whiteness and of the police," Osterweil explained on NPR. "The very basis of property in the U.S. is derived through whiteness and through Black oppression, through the history of slavery and settler domination of the country."



Nope. Notions of private property can be found in ancient China, the Islamic world and, well, everywhere.



Even the Korean grocers targeted by looting have it coming, according to Osterweil, because they're working in the white man's system of "ownership." And ownership is "innately, structurally white supremacist."



What Osterweil is really describing is revenge based on collective guilt. A Viking or Gaul from the past would instantly recognize it. So would countless non-white barbarians of yore, because that's what humans used to believe. "Your ancestors did something to my ancestors and so you have this coming."



Books could be written about how wrong — historically, morally, logically — Osterweil is. But there is one place where she's right. Rioting and looting are fun, which is why young people do it from time to time. Mobs are thrilling, which is why they're so dangerous and evil. (Presumably rapists and murderers feel "joy" too, that doesn't make them good; it illuminates their evilness.) That's why civilized societies try to prevent them. Barbarians come up with clever word salads to defend them.

[Anonymous]

According to Vicky Osterweil, owning property or a business is inherently racist.



By Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast



Despite author's claims, there's no defence for looting



"Looting is a highly racialized word from its very inception in the English language," Osterweil said in the NPR interview. "It's taken from Hindi, lut, which means 'goods' or 'spoils.'"



How this is relevant, or even evidence that the word is "racialized," is a mystery given that maybe two in 10 million people know its etymology. Other words with Hindi origins: pundit, guru, khaki, cashmere and pajamas. The horror.



This is a good example of confusing words and things. Looting — mobs grabbing stuff that doesn't belong to them — is an ancient practice dating back hundreds of thousands of years, before we even had the concept of dates. Pillaging, ransacking, theft — call it what you like — is how tribes acquired stuff before the invention of trade.



In short: Osterweil thinks she's making some powerful neo-Marxist argument on the bleeding edge of theory, but what she's discovered is tribal barbarism and put a fresh coat of paint on it.



She is fluent in all the latest buzzwords and campus jargon. The "so-called" United States of America, she writes in her book, was founded in "cisheteropatriarchal racial capitalist" violence. (I'm getting my quotes from Graeme Wood's excellent review in The Atlantic, as I have no desire to saddle Osterweil with the guilt of profiting from her work.)



Destroying businesses is an "experience of pleasure, joy and freedom," she writes. Osterweil also insists it's a form of "queer birth," and that "riots are violent, extreme and femme as f---." Looting isn't wrong, she claims, but rather a form of "proletarian shopping."



"Looting strikes at the heart of property, of whiteness and of the police," Osterweil explained on NPR. "The very basis of property in the U.S. is derived through whiteness and through Black oppression, through the history of slavery and settler domination of the country."



Nope. Notions of private property can be found in ancient China, the Islamic world and, well, everywhere.



Even the Korean grocers targeted by looting have it coming, according to Osterweil, because they're working in the white man's system of "ownership." And ownership is "innately, structurally white supremacist."



What Osterweil is really describing is revenge based on collective guilt. A Viking or Gaul from the past would instantly recognize it. So would countless non-white barbarians of yore, because that's what humans used to believe. "Your ancestors did something to my ancestors and so you have this coming."



Books could be written about how wrong — historically, morally, logically — Osterweil is. But there is one place where she's right. Rioting and looting are fun, which is why young people do it from time to time. Mobs are thrilling, which is why they're so dangerous and evil. (Presumably rapists and murderers feel "joy" too, that doesn't make them good; it illuminates their evilness.) That's why civilized societies try to prevent them. Barbarians come up with clever word salads to defend them.

Does this retarded hypotwat own anything? A car, property, jewelry, electronic devices? If she does, she's a white supremacist.

[Anonymous]

Only racist white people own their houses. Good people rent state owned apartments.

[cc]

Aw. I  see you are learning how it works ^^







https://www.theepochtimes.com/california-prosecutor-need-of-looters-should-be-considered-when-mulling-charges_3490434.html">California Prosecutor: 'Need' of Looters Should Be Considered When Mulling Charges



Prosecutors in a California county are being told to take into account the "need" of people accused of looting when deciding whether to file charges.



New guidelines tell prosecutors at the Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office to consider: "Was this theft offense substantially motivated by the state of emergency, or simply a theft offense which occurred contemporaneous to the declared state of emergency?"



Prosecutors should consider whether the business was open or closed when it was looted, how the suspect gained entry to the business, and the nature, quantity, and value of the goods stolen.



The new guidelines ask: "Was the theft was [sic] committed for financial gain or personal need?"



The guidelines were published by East County Today after being reported on first by Red State.



The district attorney's office didn't respond to requests for comment for this story.



https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2020/09/07/dania-becton-1-700x420.jpg">



District Attorney Diana Becton, a Democrat who received financial backing from left-wing billionaire George Soros, entered office in 2017 before winning re-election.

[Gaon]

According to Vicky Osterweil, owning property or a business is inherently racist.



By Jonah Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast



Despite author's claims, there's no defence for looting



"Looting is a highly racialized word from its very inception in the English language," Osterweil said in the NPR interview. "It's taken from Hindi, lut, which means 'goods' or 'spoils.'"



How this is relevant, or even evidence that the word is "racialized," is a mystery given that maybe two in 10 million people know its etymology. Other words with Hindi origins: pundit, guru, khaki, cashmere and pajamas. The horror.



This is a good example of confusing words and things. Looting — mobs grabbing stuff that doesn't belong to them — is an ancient practice dating back hundreds of thousands of years, before we even had the concept of dates. Pillaging, ransacking, theft — call it what you like — is how tribes acquired stuff before the invention of trade.



In short: Osterweil thinks she's making some powerful neo-Marxist argument on the bleeding edge of theory, but what she's discovered is tribal barbarism and put a fresh coat of paint on it.



She is fluent in all the latest buzzwords and campus jargon. The "so-called" United States of America, she writes in her book, was founded in "cisheteropatriarchal racial capitalist" violence. (I'm getting my quotes from Graeme Wood's excellent review in The Atlantic, as I have no desire to saddle Osterweil with the guilt of profiting from her work.)



Destroying businesses is an "experience of pleasure, joy and freedom," she writes. Osterweil also insists it's a form of "queer birth," and that "riots are violent, extreme and femme as f---." Looting isn't wrong, she claims, but rather a form of "proletarian shopping."



"Looting strikes at the heart of property, of whiteness and of the police," Osterweil explained on NPR. "The very basis of property in the U.S. is derived through whiteness and through Black oppression, through the history of slavery and settler domination of the country."



Nope. Notions of private property can be found in ancient China, the Islamic world and, well, everywhere.



Even the Korean grocers targeted by looting have it coming, according to Osterweil, because they're working in the white man's system of "ownership." And ownership is "innately, structurally white supremacist."



What Osterweil is really describing is revenge based on collective guilt. A Viking or Gaul from the past would instantly recognize it. So would countless non-white barbarians of yore, because that's what humans used to believe. "Your ancestors did something to my ancestors and so you have this coming."



Books could be written about how wrong — historically, morally, logically — Osterweil is. But there is one place where she's right. Rioting and looting are fun, which is why young people do it from time to time. Mobs are thrilling, which is why they're so dangerous and evil. (Presumably rapists and murderers feel "joy" too, that doesn't make them good; it illuminates their evilness.) That's why civilized societies try to prevent them. Barbarians come up with clever word salads to defend them.

Does this retarded hypotwat own anything? A car, property, jewelry, electronic devices? If she does, she's a white supremacist.

American Marxists ridiculously associate free markets with white supremacy.

[Renee]

The chaos, looting and destruction are all Trumps fault...This is Trump's America.



Brought to you courtesy of a desperate political party that thinks the American people are too stupid not to realize the truth.



Well some of them are that stupid and they are all called democrats.