Trump supporters were mischaracterized by the media-what else is new

[cc]

That puts it where it is at  .. the problem is, where it is at ..  is not temporary

[Anonymous]

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/50340687_582725608819529_6177977170128797696_o.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=ElSDc1vtfy8AX-IKF9N&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=2cb369594f8375c850375f8401835fe7&oe=6020A355">

Nancy Pelosi didn't seem to object when ANTIFA entered property that wasn't theirs all summer long..



She suddenly cares about obeying the law when her office was entered.

[Anonymous]

DEMOCRATS AND TRUMP HATERS ARE COMPARING A FEW HOURS OF CHAOS TO MONTHS OF LOOTING AND DESTRUCTION

[Odinson]

They only break the law when the law is inconvenient to them.

[Anonymous]

The democRATs conveniently forget than in 2011 the capital of Wisconsin was held up for 2 weeks by democRAT voting protesters.

[Odinson]

Not to mention the more recent event of "Chaz".





Whether it was antifa or the trump-supporters who invaded the capitol, it served those senators right.



You reap what you sow and the democrats didnt condemn antifa/blm riots.

[Anonymous]

Not to mention the more recent event of "Chaz".





Whether it was antifa or the trump-supporters who invaded the capitol, it served those senators right.



You reap what you sow and the democrats didnt condemn antifa/blm riots.

BULLSEYE!! That's all I've got to say about the Dems' blatant hypocrisy and bullying all opposition into submission or extinction. God bless the United Socialist States of America. They're going to need divine intervention.

[Anonymous]

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/135919189_179908327199706_6621323375352117483_n.jpg?_nc_cat=1&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=MQJPEhxhQNgAX_MM_UJ&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=704cb5aa5ec7d0d534d50e94a0d888b1&oe=60215A12">

[Anonymous]

https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/136700302_1130732770694188_1983313213319400850_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=M1qEMdB008QAX8nJpbM&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=8c93b16fce76ae976f1daa52a8ab4cab&oe=60222EAB">

[Odinson]

Google is too big...



It should be cut into pieces like Standard Oil.





Big part of capitalism is to ensure competition... Prevent monopolies and cartels.





Certain peeps wont like it but its necessary.

[Anonymous]

Google is too big...



It should be cut into pieces like Standard Oil.





Big part of capitalism is to ensure competition... Prevent monopolies and cartels.





Certain peeps wont like it but its necessary.

Monopolies are very bad..



The only thing I agreed with generalissimo Chiang Kai Shek about was his opposition to monopolies..



Which is why Taiwan never followed the massive conglomerate development model that Japan and South Korea did.

[Anonymous]

Rep. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) noted that the anger that sparked the Capitol breach was, in part, triggered by years of "fomenting the type of vitriol that has been dividing our nation over the course of many years and it has to stop."



Trump told the crowd beforehand that their protest suggests "the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country" and "let us walk down Pennsylvania Avenue." The president did not tell the protesters to breach the Capitol or commit acts of violence and later condemned the violence that did occur. Trump told the protesters to "peacefully and patriotically make your voices be heard."

[Anonymous]

Liberal law professor, Jonathan Turley warns of the damage Democrats would do to Constitution if they impeach Trump again.



The George Washington University Law School explained in an essay for The Hill:



The author Franz Kafka once wrote, "My guiding principle is this. Guilt is never to be doubted." Democrats suddenly appear close to adopting that standard into the Constitution as they prepare for a second impeachment of President Trump. With seeking his removal for incitement, Democrats would gut not only the impeachment standard but also free speech, all in a mad rush to remove Trump just days before his term ends.



Democrats are seeking to remove Trump on the basis of his remarks to supporters before the rioting at the Capitol. Like others, I condemned those remarks as he gave them, calling them reckless and wrong. I also opposed the challenges to electoral votes in Congress. But his address does not meet the definition for incitement under the criminal code. It would be viewed as protected speech by the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Remember in 2016 when Obama was President and hundreds of BLM blocked interstate highways and violently accosted police (even killing several)? We were told, "To assign the actions of one person to an entire movement is dangerous and irresponsible."  



Remember in 2018 during the Kavanaugh hearings when a mob of Democrats stormed the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, DC, and pounded their fists in rage on the door. We were told, "It's understandable."



Remember this summer's riots in major cities across the country when groups of Democrats marched in the streets, set buildings on fire, looted businesses, assaulted and even killed bystanders and police?  We were told, "These are mostly peaceful protests."



Remember when Democrats seized several blocks of the Capitol Hill neighborhood in downtown Seattle, declaring it an autonomous zone? Remember the guns and deaths and utter destruction? We were told, "It's a block party atmosphere."



Remember when a crazed mob gathered after the Republican National Convention and attacked Rand Paul, a sitting U.S. Senator? We were told, "No justice, no peace."



Remember how police were told to stand down, governors refused to call in the national guard, and Democrats paid bail for violent protesters who were arrested? We were told, "This is the only way oppressed people can be heard."



I have condemned violent protests and lawlessness every single time they've been reported. I condemn the actions of those who stormed the Capitol yesterday. But I refuse to condemn hundreds of thousands of peaceful protestors because a handful (52 arrested) chose to be lawless and to defy everything the vast majority of the crowd stood for. Conservatives are defenders of the Constitution, the police, and the rule of law. Because a relative few people decided to do something stupid doesn't nullify the concerns of the many.

The real culprit here? The mainstream media has been telling us for years that violence is the only way people who feel oppressed can be heard, it's the only way to get justice, and this is what democracy looks like. Apparently, a few who were in the crowd on Wednesday listened to them.



The inflammatory rhetoric of the Left caused this, and it's about time Democrats and the mainstream media took responsibility for dividing Americans and attempting to humiliate those who support the President or any conservative ideals. They have pushed people to the brink, even while claiming, "It's time for unity." It's time for careful reflection and change on all sides. God help us!

[Thiel]

Analysis of Ashli Babbit Video Suggests Coordinated Actions—Interview W. Masako Ganaha