COVID-19 >> New Drug Death & adverse reaction VACCINE TRACKING thread...!!

[Anonymous]

Over 400 million doses of Covid-19 vaccines have now been administered in China, according to the National Health Commission -- more than in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany combined.



Of course, 400 million doses doesn't even cover half of China's population of 1.4 billion people, but the vaccination rate is speeding up. Chinese authorities announced the first 100 million people had been vaccinated on March 27. After that, it took another 26 days to reach 200 million, and then 17 days to hit 300 million.



The latest 100 million doses were given in just nine days.

Sinovac though.

[cc]

Yes. Sinovac efficiency runs as low as 50% in some tests, higher in others



All tests seemed effective on greatly reducing symptoms for those who became infected  ... however at least 2 tests showed considerable reduction in effectiveness (with antibodies reducing) over a fairly short period of time



I believe it is made using the technique of older vaccines, from virus



Brazil testing showed that P1 variant often got past it & infected recipients - however, it was fairly effective vs symptom severity



As testing  to standards we use was never done, jury is out on it for scientists



It's the one Trudy thought he had much of lined up and thus did not order other vaccines till XI decided otherwise & Trudy scrambled to get others but a day late & a dollar short (actually months late / to the back of the line)

[Anonymous]

Yes. Sinovac efficiency runs as low as 50% in some tests, higher in others



All tests seemed effective on greatly reducing symptoms for those who became infected  ... however at least 2 tests showed considerable reduction in effectiveness (with antibodies reducing) over a fairly short period of time



I believe it is made using the technique of older vaccines, from virus



Brazil testing showed that P1 variant often got past it & infected recipients - however, it was fairly effective vs symptom severity



As testing  to standards we use was never done, jury is out on it for scientists



It's the one Trudy thought he had much of lined up and thus did not order other vaccines till XI decided otherwise & Trudy scrambled to get others but a day late & a dollar short (actually months late / to the back of the line)

I'm so glad I never got Sinovac.

[cc]

For sure. Seems our Trudy was not thinking in our interests when he ordered it .. and worse, exclusively which is why we are so far behind



We were very lucky to get increasingly large deliveries from Pfizer especially what with being so late ordering other brands

[cc]

Why does Quebec have 75% already vaccinated with at least one dose? (according to "Glo Bull" News today)



Does Trudy's preference province get special treatment???? ... like OUR vaccine??

[Anonymous]

Studies find California child hospitalizations from COVID-19 were 'grossly inflated' by at least 40% — findings 'likely' to be the same across US



The reported number of children hospitalized with COVID-19 in California was "grossly inflated," potentially leading policymakers and parents to believe kids were at higher risk from the virus than they actually are, according to two new studies.



"Hospital Pediatrics," a journal of medicine for pediatric care, published two research papers Wednesday that found child hospitalizations for COVID-19 were over-counted by at least 40% in the state, and researchers believe it's likely national numbers were similarly inflated. New York magazine reported commentary from Dr. Monica Gandhi, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California, San Francisco, and her colleague Amy Beck, an associate professor of pediatrics, that explained the studies' findings.



"Taken together, these studies underscore the importance of clearly distinguishing between children hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 found on universal testing versus those hospitalized for COVID-19 disease," they wrote. The reported hospitalization rates "greatly overestimate the true burden of COVID-19 disease in children." In an interview, Gandhi told New York magazine "there is no reason to think these findings would be exclusive to California. This sort of retrospective chart review will likely reveal the same findings across the country."



In one study, conducted at a children's hospital in Northern California, among the 117 pediatric SARS-CoV2-positive patients hospitalized between May 10, 2020, and February 10, 2021, the authors concluded that 53 of them (or 45 percent) "were unlikely to be caused by SARS-CoV-2." The reasons for hospital admission for these "unlikely" patients included surgeries, cancer treatment, a psychiatric episode, urologic issues, and various infections such as cellulitis, among other diagnoses. The study also found that 46 (or 39.3 percent) of patients coded as SARS-CoV2 positive were asymptomatic. In other words, despite patients' testing positive for the virus as part of the hospital's universal screening, COVID-19 symptoms were absent, therefore it was not the reason for the hospitalization. Any instance where the link between a positive SARS-CoV2 test and cause of admission was uncertain the authors erred toward giving a "likely" categorization.



In the second study, at the fifth-largest children's hospital in the country, out of 146 records listing patients as positive for SARS-CoV-2 from May 1, 2020, to September 30, 2020, the authors classified 58 (40 percent) as having "incidental" diagnosis, meaning there was no documentation of COVID-19 symptoms prior to hospitalization. Like the first study, and as has been typical around the nation, this hospital implemented universal testing of inpatients for SARS-CoV-2. An example of incidentally SARS-CoV-2-positive patients are those who came to the hospital because of fractures. Patients who may have had COVID-19 symptoms but who had a clearly documented alternative reason for them, such as a child with abdominal pain and fever found to be related to an abdominal abscess, were also deemed to have incidental diagnosis. The study categorized 68 patients, or 47 percent, as "potentially symptomatic," which was defined as when "COVID-19 was not the primary reason for admission for these patients, and COVID-19 alone did not directly require hospitalization without the concomitant condition." Examples of these patients were those with acute appendicitis, since that condition includes gastrointestinal symptoms that may also present in COVID-19.

There are two important implications of these findings. The first is that policies that disproportionally affect children, like school closures or the cancellation of youth sports or summer camps, were implemented after reports greatly overstated the risk of children being hospitalized from COVID-19.



"Children have suffered tremendously due to policies that have kept schools and recreational facilities closed to them, and the burden has been greatest on children who are low-income and English-language learners," the researchers noted in their commentary. New York magazine pointed out "the hospitalization numbers for children were already extremely low relative to adults — at the pandemic's peak this winter, it was roughly ten times lower than for 18-to-49-year-olds and 77 times lower than those age 65 and up." If 40% of those hospitalizations were reported inaccurately, the actual rates are "vanishingly small," and those policies implemented to protect children may have done far more harm than good.



The second implication relates to the Food and Drug Administration's "emergency use authorization" for COVID-19 vaccines for children. If the studies' findings show that COVID-19 "poses a dramatically lower incidence of pediatric hospitalizations than the data have shown thus far," then the need for an emergency authorization of vaccines for kids to protect them from going to the hospital is perhaps less than previously thought.



Stefan Baral, an infectious diseases epidemiologist and physician at Johns Hopkins, told New York magazine the studies' findings "reinforce the importance of going through a meaningful process to understand the risks to children" from the vaccines.



The FDA on Monday approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 12-15 under its emergency use authorization, finding that the vaccine is safe and effective for individuals 12 and older.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/studies-child-hospitalizations-grossly-inflated?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210519Trending-4YearOld&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News">https://www.theblaze.com/news/studies-c ... ing%20News">https://www.theblaze.com/news/studies-child-hospitalizations-grossly-inflated?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20210519Trending-4YearOld&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News

[Frood]

Japan wisely bans blood donations by the criminally stupid covid injected:



https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/">https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/

[cc]

Japan wisely bans blood donations by the criminally stupid covid injected:



https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/">https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/

Wow. That convinces me. I'm getting the stuff sucked out of me immediately

[Frood]

Too late. You're tainted for life.

[cc]

Doc says only 40% of my DNA has been ruined & they likely can replace it successfully



hmmmmm .... "likely"

[Anonymous]

Japan wisely bans blood donations by the criminally stupid covid injected:



https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/">https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/

I just looked that up. That is misleading bullshit for conspiracy theorists. That is the kind of rumours old Scouse falls for.



In the midst of this, a post on Facebook has started spreading in the U.S., misleadingly claiming, "JAPAN refuses blood donations from any who received shot/s! Wow... What's that tell you?!"



But Japan has not been refusing to accept blood donations from vaccinated individuals; it simply put them on hold while the government drew up donor guidelines.



Hitoshi Hatta, a spokesman for the Japanese Embassy in Washington, D.C., wrote in an email on May 7 that the Health Ministry recently adopted guidelines calling for "people not to donate blood within (only) 48 hours after vaccination for Covid-19."



He said in a telephone interview that the delay has nothing to do with concerns about the vaccine's safety, but is intended to give would-be donors time to get over any possible side effects from the vaccine. Side effects can include dizziness, fever and body aches, and would preclude them from giving blood.

[Frood]

:001_rolleyes:

[Anonymous]

Japan wisely bans blood donations by the criminally stupid covid injected:



https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/">https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/

I just looked that up. That is misleading bullshit for conspiracy theorists. That is the kind of rumours old Scouse falls for.



In the midst of this, a post on Facebook has started spreading in the U.S., misleadingly claiming, "JAPAN refuses blood donations from any who received shot/s! Wow... What's that tell you?!"



But Japan has not been refusing to accept blood donations from vaccinated individuals; it simply put them on hold while the government drew up donor guidelines.



Hitoshi Hatta, a spokesman for the Japanese Embassy in Washington, D.C., wrote in an email on May 7 that the Health Ministry recently adopted guidelines calling for "people not to donate blood within (only) 48 hours after vaccination for Covid-19."



He said in a telephone interview that the delay has nothing to do with concerns about the vaccine's safety, but is intended to give would-be donors time to get over any possible side effects from the vaccine. Side effects can include dizziness, fever and body aches, and would preclude them from giving blood.

Dinky actually tried to post this as truth?? You can't donate blood until 48 hours after being vaccinated becomes Japan bans vaccinated people from donating blood. :001_rolleyes:

[Frood]

:001_rolleyes:



Nobody seems to have fully read that link except myself...

[Anonymous]

Japan wisely bans blood donations by the criminally stupid covid injected:



https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/">https://www.jrc.or.jp/donation/about/refrain/detail_08/

I just looked that up. That is misleading bullshit for conspiracy theorists. That is the kind of rumours old Scouse falls for.



In the midst of this, a post on Facebook has started spreading in the U.S., misleadingly claiming, "JAPAN refuses blood donations from any who received shot/s! Wow... What's that tell you?!"



But Japan has not been refusing to accept blood donations from vaccinated individuals; it simply put them on hold while the government drew up donor guidelines.



Hitoshi Hatta, a spokesman for the Japanese Embassy in Washington, D.C., wrote in an email on May 7 that the Health Ministry recently adopted guidelines calling for "people not to donate blood within (only) 48 hours after vaccination for Covid-19."



He said in a telephone interview that the delay has nothing to do with concerns about the vaccine's safety, but is intended to give would-be donors time to get over any possible side effects from the vaccine. Side effects can include dizziness, fever and body aches, and would preclude them from giving blood.