C36 Bill is the worst anti freedom legislation in Canada?

[Frood]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/



Emotional crime?  ac_crying

[Anonymous]

They've already passed C-10 which is an assault on free speech.

[Anonymous]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/



Emotional crime?  ac_crying

The people in this country will reelect Justine. Freedom and prosperity are overrated.

[Anonymous]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/



Emotional crime?  ac_crying

Oh my.

[Anonymous]

https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/">https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2qjfOfIjnI/



Emotional crime?  ac_crying

This country is so screwed.

[Anonymous]

They've already passed C-10 which is an assault on free speech.

C-36 takes the erosion of free speech even further.

[cc]

They've already passed C-10 which is an assault on free speech.

C-36 takes the erosion of free speech even further.

The coup de grâce. Total control now .. and even officially so

[Anonymous]

They've already passed C-10 which is an assault on free speech.

C-36 takes the erosion of free speech even further.

The coup de grâce. Total control now .. and even officially so

We had a great country once. Freedom and opportunity for all. Now the country works only for a privileged few.

[Zetsu]

Sounds like it's a good time for troublemakers to do anything they want without feeling remorse.  

[Anonymous]

I haven't read all the details of of C-10 and C-36 yet.

[Anonymous]

The Liberals used every trick in the book to cut short debate on these two very bad bills. The NDP and the Bloc helped them with this assault on free speech.

[Anonymous]

Liberal hate speech bill will put a chill on free speech

Trudeau government keeps playing politics with our rights



Bill C-36 was introduced in the final hours of the last sitting day of a Parliament that will go down in nobody's books as one to remember fondly. It's an attempt to replace a section of the Canadian Human Rights Act that was repealed seven years ago over fears it was being abused by specific groups to silence views they disagreed with. To that end the new bill attempts to tighten up the definition of hatred: "Hatred," it says, "means the emotion that involves detestation or vilification and that is stronger than dislike or disdain."



If, after reading that last sentence, you ask yourself, "OK, but what precisely identifies that new level, and who decides?" you have identified the fundamental weakness of C-36, and any other law that seeks to throw a rope around hatred and haul it away. It's the very same problem that prompted the change in the human rights act seven years ago. As Cara Zwibel, director of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association's fundamental freedoms program, told National Post this week: "The concerns that we had (then) continue to be concerns."



Despite the new wording, she said, the bill may be abused in much the same way, by using it as a tool to silence people by threatening to haul them before a judge over views that may be unpopular or controversial, but nothing more. What's more, observed University of Windsor professor Richard Moon, the vast growth of social media sites in recent years could see authorities swamped in a way no one previously anticipated.



"The volume of hate speech out there that individuals or groups could make complaints about is so great that I don't see how the system can function or operate," he said.

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-view-liberal-hate-speech-bill-will-put-a-chill-on-free-speech">https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-vie ... ree-speech">https://nationalpost.com/opinion/np-view-liberal-hate-speech-bill-will-put-a-chill-on-free-speech

[Anonymous]

Justine is promising $20,000-$50,000 fines for online hate speech violations. His regime gets to decide what is hate speech.

[Anonymous]

Justine is promising $20,000-$50,000 fines for online hate speech violations. His regime gets to decide what is hate speech.

Trudeau is turning this country into the PRC(People's Republic of Canada).

[cc]

IT KEEPS GETTING WORSE AT AN ALARMING RATE



https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2021/05/28/facebook-logo-700x420.jpg">

The Liberals' new proposed legislation would police online communication service providers such as Facebook and YouTube.



https://www.theepochtimes.com/liberals-online-harms-proposal-alarms-free-speech-advocates_3932338.html">Liberals' 'Online Harms' Proposal Alarms Free Speech Advocates



Legislation proposed by the federal government to combat "online harms" worries free speech advocates, who say it could limit discourse on social media platforms.



The framework proposes establishing a Digital Safety Commission of Canada that would include three bodies: a Digital Safety Commissioner, a Digital Recourse Council (DRC), and an advisory board.



Together, they would police what the proposal terms online communication service providers (OCSPs), such as Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, and Pornhub. The ostensible goal is to eliminate hate speech, terrorist content, content that incites violence, intimate images shared without consent of the participants, and child sexual exploitation.



OCSPs would be required to implement measures to proactively monitor for harmful content, including via automated systems. They would have to respond to complaints flagged by any user within 24 hours, including removing that content if deemed harmful.



In addition, OCSPs would have to meet reporting requirements, which have confidentiality restrictions in order to protect information such as that involving privacy, national security, or commercial interests. The restrictions would include allowing OCSPs to designate certain information as confidential, which would preclude them from notifying affected users.



Platforms that fail to comply could face fines of up to $10 million or 3 percent of their gross global revenue—whichever is higher—imposed by the Digital Safety Commissioner. Alternatively, the commissioner could refer offences to prosecutors, in which case the fines could be up to $25 million or 5 percent of the platform's gross global revenue, whichever is higher.



The commissioner could also apply to the Federal Court to require telecommunications service providers to block or filter access to all or part of a service in Canada that has repeatedly refused to remove child sexual exploitation or terrorist content or both. The commissioner would also collect and share information with other government departments and agencies.



The proposal's discussion guide calls for changes to the Canadian Security and Intelligence Service Act to give CSIS the ability to more quickly obtain the subscriber information of those involved in spreading "ideologically motivated violent extremist" content online.



The commissioner could even send inspectors into workplaces and homes to examine or acquire documents or other information of concern, including computer algorithms and software.





'A Problem for Freedom of Expression'

Cara Zwibel of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association expressed concerns with the legislation.



"It's got some things in it that we, of course, were hoping it would not. It's got 24-hour takedown requirements. It allows for website blocking. So there's a lot in there that we're pretty concerned about and we think Canadians will be concerned about," Zwibel said in an interview.



"The big issue with the proposal is that there's a potential to interpret these things very broadly. And by creating these 24-hour takedown requirements, you're incentivizing social media companies to err on the side of removal, which is obviously a problem for freedom of expression."





"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free."

― Ronald Reagan