Question for Erica: if you were single, would you date a middle aged Asian nerd

[Aryan]

I always said Seoulfag was lying about having a wife.

SCOUSE, Seoul has said many times he's never been married and has no children..



He has girlfriend.....a beautiful Caucasian one and he knows you're very happy for both of them.

Uh huh.



Presumably they live in different apartments or have seperate bedrooms, considering the fact he claimed to have caught covid a while ago and she hadn't.



Either that or they don't go anywhere near one another.

[Aryan]

I have a soft spot for Scouse.

I don't dislike SCOUSE, but he is immature..



That's not necessarily a negative thing on these forumz..



But, he used to start threads that were close to being in violation of Canadian law..



He doesn't do that anymore, so no problem.

There's another uptight chick like you on BF called Lotusbud.



I think the pair of you would get along famously.

[Dove]

Oh man. Lotus and Fash wouldnt have a single thing in common whatsoever lol.

[Breakfall]

I thought this was meant to be a "flame-free" sub-forum of Erica's, or is there an exception to the rule? Put offenders on ice until they learn a few manners. We don't need lowly BF follow-through here.

[Breakfall]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTsRUbVXf4yoY7finGyTnDUV8JzMGp5eMmWYg&usqp=CAU">

[cc]

I thought this was meant to be a "flame-free" sub-forum of Erica's, or is there an exception to the rule? Put offenders on ice until they learn a few manners. We don't need lowly BF follow-through here.

My impression as well



Further, I got the impression that Erica wanted a positive air to it



If that is correct, major negatives .. and especially unprovoked negatives  against others which so suck the clean air out and take much away  from a good forum,  won't cut it here

[cw_]

For some bizarre reason it says "Politics free flame zone" on the tin.

[Breakfall]

I thought this was meant to be a "flame-free" sub-forum of Erica's, or is there an exception to the rule? Put offenders on ice until they learn a few manners. We don't need lowly BF follow-through here.

My impression as well



Further, I got the impression that Erica wanted a positive air to it



If that is correct, major negatives .. and especially unprovoked negatives  against others  won't cut it here

They start off subtle...and then it goes all pear-shaped. Time and time again. Formative action is required..."no soft spots" or favouritism if this is going to work from the outset. The majority of us are middle-aged and have the scars to prove it. Let's make this work.

 ac_dance

[Trump’s Niece]

I'm at work. Looking around, I don't see any politics being discussed or anything troubling. What is the problem?

[Trump’s Niece]

For some bizarre reason it says "Politics free flame zone" on the tin.

Exactly. We can be positive and still have some shoot the shit fun.

[cw_]

Maybe somebody has diaper rash?   Just a guess.

[Trump’s Niece]

Are you guys complaining about Scouse? Looks like he's being civil.

[cc]

I thought this was meant to be a "flame-free" sub-forum of Erica's, or is there an exception to the rule? Put offenders on ice until they learn a few manners. We don't need lowly BF follow-through here.

My impression as well



Further, I got the impression that Erica wanted a positive air to it



If that is correct, major negatives .. and especially unprovoked negatives  against others  won't cut it here

They start off subtle...and then it goes all pear-shaped. Time and time again. Formative action is required..."no soft spots" or favouritism if this is going to work from the outset. The majority of us are middle-aged and have the scars to prove it. Let's make this work.

 ac_dance

Agree 100



Cutting off negatives almost immediate and void of "soft spots" is absolutely necessary to achieve the high  the quality intended



Negatives breed more negatives until the initial purpose is destroyed





Just looked above at post placed while I was typing ... .so the above said, seems I may be have  a totally incorrect impression .... & the level I had surmised was incorrect



Seems I made incorrect assumptions as to the level, so will bow out and stay totally out of the way

[Trump’s Niece]

Oh hell, here we go



Can someone tell me what or who did what?

[cc]

Obviously no one other than myself  did anything wrong   .. I simply had made a very  incorrect assumption as to intended "drift"

I was very incorrect ... my mistake, not yours



Forget we  said anything .... & as I said above for myself, I will bow out and stay out of the way .. . peace