Any countries with a tranny ban?

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

Rubbish. Nobody exists until they're in my little black book.

Get triggered, clown!



John Adams

June 21, 1776

"YAY! I like penis!".



Now have yourself a nice "REEEEEE!"  ac_hithere

Sawwry, I can't get triggered, you'll have to show me how, leftie.

James Madison:

"It is the doodie of every mong to rimjob to the Mighty Masturbator such homo....Before any mong can be constipated as a mumbler of Cumgurgle Simpery, wonk wonk wonk, where's my thrupple?

I doubt he'd disagree with the underlying premise.



ie. Take care of yourself and live by your conscience while respecting the lives and choices of others (within reason).

Was that what he was saying? I though he was wanking on about his magical sky fairy again!

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

Still no proof that magical... "man"... exists. And none that he doesn't.



I'm beginning to think Crazy Lokmar is as riddled with syphilis as those GAYTHEISTS he's got a 24/7 boner for.

[Frood]

Get triggered, clown!



John Adams

June 21, 1776

"YAY! I like penis!".



Now have yourself a nice "REEEEEE!"  ac_hithere

Sawwry, I can't get triggered, you'll have to show me how, leftie.

I doubt he'd disagree with the underlying premise.



ie. Take care of yourself and live by your conscience while respecting the lives and choices of others (within reason).

Was that what he was saying? I though he was wanking on about his magical sky fairy again!

You're just approaching from two different angles

..



Lokmar is approaching from a hierarchical organisation that decides what you can and can't think, do or don't, or say/not say.



Adolf Oliver Bush (are you the 1st or 2nd, or even further lineages? Sorry, different discussion)



As I was saying, AOB does it from his gut instincts...and for the most part, aligns closer to Lokmar.



So what's the difference?



A work of historical fiction loosely based hearsay, speculation, and rewrites/omissions since.



 







PS- not saying that koolaid flavour couldn't be the best, only.... how do you know until you've sampled others?

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

Oh, I know there's an overlap between Lokmar and myself, a quite significant one in fact. I don't need to agree with every last thing ha says to recognise a few basic truths we share. Not allowing people to groom children in ways that would negatively affect them and the communities they reside in would be one such truth, a pretty big one actually. Sanctity of the family unit would be another.



Our differences are just as well documented and just as likely irreconcilable. If he chooses to express that as making me his polar opposite, I'm more than happy to match him. Empirically his "Us or Them" approach is easily dealt with and at length. Elements on the left are known to throw that out all the time. And you know me. I can out-filth an epithet like "kweirdo" of "gaytheist" any day of the week, moreover I run a complete deficit of fucks to give regarding other peoples perceptions of me and my actions. Well, most of the time... I do bother to look out for those interests I share common ground with. Even with people like Lokmar.



As for the nym... well the current avatar of a crudely drawn bald pudendum should clue you in to it - "ate off all of her bush". Om nom nom.

[Lokmar]

Still no proof that magical... "man"... exists. And none that he doesn't.



I'm beginning to think Crazy Lokmar is as riddled with syphilis as those GAYTHEISTS he's got a 24/7 boner for.

Be sure to not exercise your God given Inalienable rights, loon.



Congrats, BTW. You're the first gaytheist tard I've ever hear proclaim that executing kweirdos is leftist!

[Lokmar]

The history of this countries foundings rest SOLELY on God given rights. By all means, dont recognize it but its historical unarguable FACT! I can post reams of quotes from the founders affirming this. As a consequence, God given inalienable rights come with all sorts of other things some dont like.

[Frood]

Sounds like a bunch of hocus pocus to me...  



I wonder what the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster think about it....

[Lokmar]

For all the disparaging remarks Judeo-Christianity gets, it created the greatest and most successful country mankind has ever known and it literally raised the white man out of a barbaric existence. Now that America has soundly rejected and ridiculed all of it, we are in rapid decline.



John Quincy Adams

"From the day of the Declaration...they (the American people) were bound by the laws of God, which they all, and by the laws of The Gospel, which they nearly all, acknowledge as the rules of their conduct."



Samuel Adams

As the Declaration of Independence was being signed, 1776, Samuel Adams declared:

"We have this day restored the Sovereign to Whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in heaven and from the rising to the setting of the sun, let His kingdom come."



Sadly, this guys name is today associated with a beer that supports kweirdo rights and other degeneracy. He would be sickened to say the least.



Sir William Blackstone is viewed as a giant in the concepts of Western Law



(Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law was the recognized authority on the law for well over a century after 1776)



"Man, considered as a creature, must necessarily be subject to the laws of his Creator, for he is entirely a dependent being....And, consequently, as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should in all points conform to his Maker's will...this will of his Maker is called the law of nature. These laws laid down by God are the eternal immutable laws of good and evil...This law of nature dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this...



"The doctrines thus delivered we call the revealed or divine law, and they are to be found only in the holy scriptures...[and] are found upon comparison to be really part of the original law of nature. Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws; that is to say, no human laws should be suffered to contradict these.



"Blasphemy against the Almighty is denying his being or providence, or uttering contumelious reproaches on our Savior Christ. It is punished, at common law by fine and imprisonment, for Christianity is part of the laws of the land.



"If [the legislature] will positively enact a thing to be done, the judges are not at liberty to reject it, for that were to set the judicial power above that of the legislature, which should be subversive of all government."



"The preservation of Christianity as a national religion is abstracted from its own intrinsic truth, of the utmost consequence to the civil state, which a single instance will sufficiently demonstrate.



"The belief of a future state of rewards and punishments, the entertaining just ideas of the main attributes ofthe Supreme Being, and a firm persuasion that He superintends and will finally compensate every action in human life (all which are revealed in the doctrines of our Savior, Christ), these are the grand foundations of all judicial oaths, which call God to witness the truth of those facts which perhaps may be only known to Him and the party attesting; all moral evidences, therefore, all confidence in human veracity, must be weakened by apostasy, and overthrown by total infidelity.



"Wherefore, all affronts to Christianity, or endeavors to depreciate its efficacy, in those who have once professed it, are highly deserving of censure."

[Lokmar]

Ben Franklin

"Freedom is not a gift bestowed upon us by other men, but a right that belongs to us by the laws of God and nature.



Only a complete moron argues rights come from men.

[Frood]

Franklin was a Deist though, as were many of his notable but silent contemporaries of the day....  

[Lokmar]

Franklin was a Deist though, as were many of his notable but silent contemporaries of the day....  

Yea he was!



Ben Franklin

"Hence bad examples to youth are more rare in America, which must be comfortable consideration to parents. To this may be truly added, that serious religion, under its various denominations, is not only tolerated, but respected and practiced.



"Atheism is unknown there; Infidelity rare and secret; so that persons may live to a great age in that country without having their piety shocked by meeting with either an Atheist or an Infidel.



"And the Divine Being seems to have manifested his approbation of the mutual forbearance and kindness with which the different sects treat each other; by the remarkable prosperity with which he has been pleased to favor the whole country."



"Here is my Creed. I believe in one God, the Creator of the Universe. That He governs it by His Providence. That he ought to be worshipped."



 

[Frood]

"Various denominations" is the key term....



How do you treat the various denominations that aren't Christianity?

[Lokmar]

"Various denominations" is the key term....



How do you treat the various denominations that aren't Christianity?

Seems like burning them at the stake would be a good idea.....in hindsight anyway.



For decades now, I've maintained that the  founders DID see what would become of this country in our current situation:



"It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains."



"If thou wouldst rule well, thou must rule for God, and to do that, thou must be ruled by him....Those who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants."



"By removing the Bible from schools we would be wasting so much time and money in punishing criminals and so little pains to prevent crime. Take the Bible out of our schools and there would be an explosion in crime."



"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."



The only non religious solution to todays ails is to throw out all our founding documents and start over. The reluctance is due to what people like me will do as a reaction to that. The blood will flow.

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

Still no proof that magical... "man"... exists. And none that he doesn't.



I'm beginning to think Crazy Lokmar is as riddled with syphilis as those GAYTHEISTS he's got a 24/7 boner for.

Be sure to not exercise your God given Inalienable rights, loon.



Congrats, BTW. You're the first gaytheist tard I've ever hear proclaim that executing kweirdos is leftist!

No I'm not. No amount of ad hominem is going to get me to "believe", not in your elusive man in the clouds, nor in his absence. I cannot be a "theist" nor an "atheist"; both require belief in something without proof and that is simply too gay for words.



Something you prove often enough, mincing about as you do, waving your Big Black Cock of Death about and lisping that you want to impart its seed into those who are at least as as gay as you are. Ever hear of Stalin? Fat fag with a porn stache, had a thing for wiping out fagmosexuals and who believed his right to execute queermos like you. You're all as gay as one another and I'm not in the habit of spreading my asscheeks to be fucked by anyone's belief.



Pack of bloody homos, the lot of you. Of course executing kweirdos is leftist, you lot have been doing it to each other since forever!  ac_razz  

The history of this countries foundings rest SOLELY on God given rights. By all means, dont recognize it but its historical unarguable FACT! I can post reams of quotes from the founders affirming this....

...but faced with the reasonable requirement of legitimizing that god by proving its fruity existence and you your piggy eyes roll back exactly like those who insist in his absence. Neither you nor they have any legitimacy in your respective beliefs, only appeals to authorities who similarly believed in what your preferred flavour of faggotry believed in. "God exists" says person A. "Nuuuu he doesn't" says person B. "Prove it" say I. "Well, so and so says..." persons A and B chorus together. "Don't be so bloody gay" say I, shoving your dildoes of choice up your blurters in the hopes one of you will grow a brain.

John Quincy Adams

Quincy??? Man that's a gay name!  ac_lmfao

Samuel Adams... Sadly, this guys name is today associated with a beer that supports kweirdo rights and other degeneracy.

Maybe because he was gay too? I couldn't say, I never met the fag.

Sir William Blackstone is viewed as...

...a guy that got granted a peerage from a house with a reputation for sexually abusing children, yeah I know. Have a guess what all of these... errr... "gentlemen" all have in common? It's the same thing you share. You all witter on with an appeal to an ultimate authority who you've never introduced me to.



And it's not as if some of your ideas aren't sound propositions, they are, don't get me wrong. But when you insist that it includes the component of belief in either an invisible friend riding shotgun in your fagmobiles and moreover this invisible man is slipping his tongue into your ears with tales of murder and mayhem against those who believe he doesn't, I, who recognise that no concrete proof has been trotted out to support either way, is going to call you god botherers and atheists alike on it.



You're all rainbow suspender wearing faggots. Get a grip on reality for once. I am in full fuck deficit on the whole faith in god vs faith in no god lunacy, at least one of you dribbling spastics needs to stop digging through your leiderhosen collection for pantywaste "proof" to wave in my face. It's not making the nut. PROVE god exists. Or PROVE god doesn't. Concrete, unequivocal PROOF either way. Stop wasting your time demanding my faith in either scenario, I'm not a mindless piggy-eyed mongtard like you theists/atheists.

"Blasphemy against the Almighty is denying his being or providence, or uttering contumelious reproaches on our Savior Christ. It is punished, at common law by fine and imprisonment, for Christianity is part of the laws of the land.



"If [the legislature] will positively enact a thing to be done, the judges are not at liberty to reject it, for that were to set the judicial power above that of the legislature, which should be subversive of all government."

And "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". I seem to recall that being a thing somewhere. Moreover, requiring categoric proof of somethings existence or absence is not the same thing as denying it outright. There goes your charge of blasphemy. No matter, it was an unconstitutional abridgement of the first amendment in any case.

"Wherefore, all affronts to Christianity, or endeavors to depreciate its efficacy, in those who have once professed it, are highly deserving of censure."

No offence, but that sounds like some fucking commie gobbledygook.

[Lokmar]

Be sure to not exercise your God given Inalienable rights, loon.



Congrats, BTW. You're the first gaytheist tard I've ever hear proclaim that executing kweirdos is leftist!

No I'm not. No amount of ad hominem is going to get me to "believe", not in your elusive man in the clouds, nor in his absence. I cannot be a "theist" nor an "atheist"; both require belief in something without proof and that is simply too gay for words.



Something you prove often enough, mincing about as you do, waving your Big Black Cock of Death about and lisping that you want to impart its seed into those who are at least as as gay as you are. Ever hear of Stalin? Fat fag with a porn stache, had a thing for wiping out fagmosexuals and who believed his right to execute queermos like you. You're all as gay as one another and I'm not in the habit of spreading my asscheeks to be fucked by anyone's belief.



Pack of bloody homos, the lot of you. Of course executing kweirdos is leftist, you lot have been doing it to each other since forever!  ac_razz  

The history of this countries foundings rest SOLELY on God given rights. By all means, dont recognize it but its historical unarguable FACT! I can post reams of quotes from the founders affirming this....

...but faced with the reasonable requirement of legitimizing that god by proving its fruity existence and you your piggy eyes roll back exactly like those who insist in his absence. Neither you nor they have any legitimacy in your respective beliefs, only appeals to authorities who similarly believed in what your preferred flavour of faggotry believed in. "God exists" says person A. "Nuuuu he doesn't" says person B. "Prove it" say I. "Well, so and so says..." persons A and B chorus together. "Don't be so bloody gay" say I, shoving your dildoes of choice up your blurters in the hopes one of you will grow a brain.

John Quincy Adams

Quincy??? Man that's a gay name!  ac_lmfao

Samuel Adams... Sadly, this guys name is today associated with a beer that supports kweirdo rights and other degeneracy.

Maybe because he was gay too? I couldn't say, I never met the fag.

Sir William Blackstone is viewed as...

...a guy that got granted a peerage from a house with a reputation for sexually abusing children, yeah I know. Have a guess what all of these... errr... "gentlemen" all have in common? It's the same thing you share. You all witter on with an appeal to an ultimate authority who you've never introduced me to.



And it's not as if some of your ideas aren't sound propositions, they are, don't get me wrong. But when you insist that it includes the component of belief in either an invisible friend riding shotgun in your fagmobiles and moreover this invisible man is slipping his tongue into your ears with tales of murder and mayhem against those who believe he doesn't, I, who recognise that no concrete proof has been trotted out to support either way, is going to call you god botherers and atheists alike on it.



You're all rainbow suspender wearing faggots. Get a grip on reality for once. I am in full fuck deficit on the whole faith in god vs faith in no god lunacy, at least one of you dribbling simpletons needs to stop digging through your leiderhosen collection your pantywaste "proof" to wave in my face. It's not making the nut. PROVE god exists. Or PROVE god doesn't. Concrete, unequivocal PROOF either way. Stop wasting your time demanding my faith in either scenario, I'm not a mindless piggy-eyed mongtard like you theists/atheists.

"Blasphemy against the Almighty is denying his being or providence, or uttering contumelious reproaches on our Savior Christ. It is punished, at common law by fine and imprisonment, for Christianity is part of the laws of the land.



"If [the legislature] will positively enact a thing to be done, the judges are not at liberty to reject it, for that were to set the judicial power above that of the legislature, which should be subversive of all government."

And "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion". I seem to recall that being a thing somewhere. Moreover, requiring categoric proof of somethings existence or absence is not the same thing as denying it outright. There goes your charge of blasphemy. No matter, it was an unconstitutional abridgement of the first amendment in any case.

"Wherefore, all affronts to Christianity, or endeavors to depreciate its efficacy, in those who have once professed it, are highly deserving of censure."

No offence, but that sounds like some fucking commie gobbledygook.

Historical documents are on my side. You've got the equivalent of "muh feelz". Lemme know when you get a bunch of gaythiest writings from the founders peers to refute THEIR own writings! LMFAO@U!