I admire this man...

[Melson Gibson]

What are your thoughts about this?







https://i.ibb.co/sVLxmZS/4130160428152532g.jpg">

[Frood]

He went insane.



Paranoid, insane, and really fucking arrogant.



He is not a role model anybody should be looking up to but I may agree that he was a product of Germany getting bent over and shafted, and that the other parties in the Treaty of Versailles are more to blame for the destruction and deaths than he ever was...

[caskur]

He was an Aries,.... nuff said!!!!

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

Hitler was a greenie, the world's first Greta Von Thunberg. Only unlike that odious little golem, Hitler actually came through on his policies, saving forests and showing a distinct distaste for screwing up the Rhine with a bunch of wanky hydroelectric dams.





https://archive.ph/PSESr">https://archive.ph/PSESr#





How ironic that the latter day progtards would take to felling those same forests because they took exception to Nazi Germany's efforts!

[DKG]

Hitler, like Mussolini and Franco opposed free markets and individual liberty. All of them lived ostentatious lifestyles while they occasionally forced austerity on the citizens of their respective nations.

[Lokmar]

hitler was a fuk up and a control freak. He made so many mistakes, its hard to believe. The ONLY thing I can remotely admire about him is he believed a society needs to be made up of a unified and cohesive ethnic group to be successful. Diversity is a weakness.

[DKG]

hitler was a fuk up and a control freak. He made so many mistakes, its hard to believe. The ONLY thing I can remotely admire about him is he believed a society needs to be made up of a unified and cohesive ethnic group to be successful. Diversity is a weakness.

A nation at the mercy of one man's whims is not a nation that prospers. Asia and Chile had dictators that were benevolent, but they deferred to others in areas they had limited expertise in. That was not the case with control freaks like Hitler and Mussolini.

[Lokmar]

hitler was a fuk up and a control freak. He made so many mistakes, its hard to believe. The ONLY thing I can remotely admire about him is he believed a society needs to be made up of a unified and cohesive ethnic group to be successful. Diversity is a weakness.

A nation at the mercy of one man's whims is not a nation that prospers. Asia and Chile had dictators that were benevolent, but they deferred to others in areas they had limited expertise in. That was not the case with control freaks like Hitler and Mussolini.

Exactly! It's difficult to find someone to be the right amount of egomaniac to be dictator, yet humble enough to delegate to others, and smart enough to know who to delegate to.



America is experiencing the flip side of that though. We have so much bureaucracy that no one is accountable and no one can effect positive change.

[Aryan]

What are your thoughts about this?







https://i.ibb.co/sVLxmZS/4130160428152532g.jpg">

It took the combination of Capitalism, Communism & International Jewry to topple his empire.



Even the haters have to appreciate just how much of a dent he put in world jewry, hence why he has been demonised so much, because they cannot risk it ever happening again.



This is arguably one of the reasons why they've been flooding White nations with millions of third worlders, because in multicultural nations, there is less social unity and cohesion, meaning that there's less chance of the people rising up against the tyrannical elite.

[Lokmar]

What are your thoughts about this?

It took the combination of Capitalism, Communism & International Jewry to topple his empire.



Even the haters have to appreciate just how much of a dent he put in world jewry, hence why he has been demonised so much, because they cannot risk it ever happening again.



This is arguably one of the reasons why they've been flooding White nations with millions of third worlders, because in multicultural nations, there is less social unity and cohesion, meaning that there's less chance of the people rising up against the tyrannical elite.

Yea, he was great at gassing, starving, and otherwise killing jews.

[Aryan]

The National Socialists didn't "gas" anyone, Herschel.   :001_rolleyes:

[Aryan]

Just for Lokmar, who bizarrely buys into jewish lies...



https://i.ibb.co/mBRc4Wd/LOLOCAUST.jpg">

[DKG]

A nation at the mercy of one man's whims is not a nation that prospers. Asia and Chile had dictators that were benevolent, but they deferred to others in areas they had limited expertise in. That was not the case with control freaks like Hitler and Mussolini.

Exactly! It's difficult to find someone to be the right amount of egomaniac to be dictator, yet humble enough to delegate to others, and smart enough to know who to delegate to.



America is experiencing the flip side of that though. We have so much bureaucracy that no one is accountable and no one can effect positive change.

Being a dictator is a tough job. Europe's dictators were utter failures who enriched themselves and their cronies and left their nations worse off then before they took over.

[Melson Gibson]

Being a dictator is a tough job. Europe's dictators were utter failures who enriched themselves and their cronies and left their nations worse off then before they took over.

Are you saying that Germany was better off pre-WWII under Weimar Republic and dealing with the Treaty of Versailles, than it was post WWII?

[DKG]

Being a dictator is a tough job. Europe's dictators were utter failures who enriched themselves and their cronies and left their nations worse off then before they took over.

Are you saying that Germany was better off pre-WWII under Weimar Republic than it was post WWII?

I am saying Germany were disasters at the end of Mussolini and Hitler's reigns. Contrast that with Augusto Pinochet's market liberalization reforms that produced high economic growth in Chile. He was also a mass murderer, but there was at least some benevolence. Europe's dictators were all egomaniacs like Lokmar said.