So DSM, tell me more about this "once saved permanently saved" stuff

[Adolf Oliver Bush]

YUO!

That's blisters mind you. Not "bliss ters", blisters. Plus, I hear you'll go blind.

[Reggie Essent]

So we're back to dick cheese then?

[Bonesaw]

[Lokmar]

So we're back to dick cheese then?

Pretty much. Adolph dont like his dick cheese factory disparaged!

[Lokmar]

NO, YUO

[Frood]

How hypocritical is it though that Male Genital Mutilation is OK but Female Genital Mutilation isn't to a Jeebus adorer?

It's all sexist and cruel. 

[Brent]

The catholic church, just like any other denomination of Christianity which teaches this idea of once saved always saved, which is found NOWHERE in scripture except when words are being rushed out of context, is of the great Harlot

fact.

I am believer, but I am not a fundamentalist. But, I do know numerous passages of Scripture declare the fact that, as an act of God, salvation is secure such as this one.

Believers are born again (regenerated) when they believe (John 3:3; Titus 3:5). For a Christian to lose his salvation, he would have to be un-regenerated. The bible gives no evidence that the new birth can be taken away.

[Frood]

Why would anyone put too much credence into a collection of work done by men and constantly revised, removed, added to for over 2000 years?

Not saying that some of the stories aren't endearing or plausible... but the rest of it is a schizophrenic dog's breakfast.

Nothing man made or written should be leaned on too heavily. 

People cling to their religious texts though... and to challenge any of it is sacrilegious to them.

Sounds like cult behaviour.

[Lokmar]

How hypocritical is it though that Male Genital Mutilation is OK but Female Genital Mutilation isn't to a Jeebus adorer?

It's all sexist and cruel. 

Oh thats nothing! How ridiculous is it that some pussified retards compare clipping a toenail to lopping off a fukin ear! Man, them "dudes" must be some hysterical lil bitches, amirite? 

[Frood]

Oh thats nothing! How ridiculous is it that some pussified retards compare clipping a toenail to lopping off a fukin ear! Man, them "dudes" must be some hysterical lil bitches, amirite? 

Dunno about that one... an ear is living flesh.

Toenails are dead material very similar in composition to bodily hair.

[Garraty_47]

Dunno about that one... an ear is living flesh.

Toenails are dead material very similar in composition to bodily hair.

His comparison ignored the real issue though.

Van Gogh cut his own ear off and while I find that pretty fucking weird it was his ear to do with as he liked. Now if someone had it off him without his consent, that would be a crime.

Same with a toenail (which grow back, unlike ears and foreskins) regardless that's nowhere near as damaging and messy. The problem isn't the severity of the procedure; it's the lack of consent before surgically altering someone's body.

[deadskinmask]

how do motherfuckers argue "consent" with a straight face? nobody asked me if it was okay to drag me into this ever increasing shithole.... there are decisions that are (and should be) left to the parents discretion.... and there are decisions that are left to the child and made as they become older.... cutting off a foreskin is in no way detrimental to a child.... especially since the selfsame ppl who argue against this will protest incessantly to kill a baby in the womb....

[deadskinmask]

Any church ran by a kweirdo or even one where they do kweirdo marriages damned well arent "Christian"

ppl who embrace the word "christian", usually are "anything but".... just as ppl who claim to be "animal lovers" are just "animal owners" that prefer to enforce their own behaviors onto their animals.... such as clothing and dietary preference and allowances.... the reason i rejected christianity was because of its "fanbase".... the worst ppl i've ever met (outside of a jailhouse) crawled out from under a church....

[Garraty_47]

how do motherfuckers argue "consent" with a straight face? nobody asked me if it was okay to drag me into this ever increasing shithole.... there are decisions that are (and should be) left to the parents discretion.... and there are decisions that are left to the child and made as they become older.... cutting off a foreskin is in no way detrimental to a child.... especially since the selfsame ppl who argue against this will protest incessantly to kill a baby in the womb....

Whataboutists gonna whataboutism, I reckon. /shrug

[deadskinmask]

Whataboutists gonna whataboutism, I reckon. /shrug

did your parents ask your consent before they wiped your shit-covered ass and slapped a fresh diaper on you? because you could've remained in your shit pants well into your toddler years and been nothing more than a slight health hazard....