LMAO - even CNN is mocking Kamoron's economic plan

[Biggie Smiles]

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha 

Aside from the fact that this dumb bitch threw HERSELF under the bus with the whole "prices are too high" she actually outdid her normal levels of stupidity with her whole descent into full blown communism

someone visit BF and tell me if that fumbling fat fuck and the fussy fellatio fairy are fucking suicidal yet

[Herman]

Still nothing on Kameltoe's website about her economic plan.

https://kamalaharris.com/

[Herman]

Kameltoe's handlers do not believe to Peronist Argentina style price controls. They think it will put them over the top in swing states.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/obama-economist-harris-price-controls?utm_source=theblaze-breaking&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20240816Trending-Afternoon&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Breaking%20News&tpcc=email-breaking
An Obama-era economist reviewed new policy proposals by Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris and said that he hopes they never come to fruition.

Harvard economist Jason Furman told the New York Times that her policies just don't make sense.

The Harris campaign released details of its economic plan on Wednesday that included price controls. At the top of the list was a federal ban on "price gouging" in groceries and food. The Times report noted that price controls are popular with voters in swing states and among progressives but opposed by most economists.

Among those are Furman, who said price controls had zero positive value.

"This is not sensible policy, and I think the biggest hope is that it ends up being a lot of rhetoric and no reality," he told the Times. "There's no upside here, and there is some downside."

Furman also explained why grocery prices increasing isn't necessarily evidence of price gouging and price controls would prevent the market from increasing production to combat high prices.

"Egg prices went up last year — it's because there weren't as many eggs, and it caused more egg production," he said.

Egg prices have dropped since the surge last year.

Harris argued in the press release that consolidation among meat production companies had led to less competition and artificially increased prices. But, when the Times reached out to the campaign to explain how their policies would ease the situation, they did not immediately respond to the request.

The campaign is facing increasing pressure and scrutiny over its refusal to take questions from the media.

Others criticized the economic policies by comparing them to those of former President Jimmy Carter in the 1970s. High inflation and unemployment eventually led to Carter's defeat by Ronald Reagan and ushered in a decade of conservative control of the government.

"As Vice President, Kamala Harris delivered the worst inflation in a generation. Now she promises to fix the mess she created with price controls? She truly is a far-left San Francisco socialist," responded Republican Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas.

This isn't the first time Furman has tossed cold water on Democratic economic policies.

In December 2021, he noted publicly that although wages had increased since President Joe Biden had taken office, inflation had eaten up all of those gains and compensation was therefore lower than it had been in 2019.

[DKG]

These are not serious proposals. They will not be implemented if she wins.

[deport_liberals]

But our problem is TRUMP isnt doing shit for weeks now and Vance is horrible.  Why the hell didn't He choose Vivek?

[Frood]

I've been limiting my presence on here because it's been more important to mock the Kamala Cunt on social media.

[deport_liberals]

Since the Hulkster there hasn't been one positive and entertaining thing out of our campaign.  Why the hell is He just giving up to this bullshit?

[Biggie Smiles]

But our problem is TRUMP isnt doing shit for weeks now and Vance is horrible.  Why the hell didn't He choose Vivek?

Ever heard the wise saying 'do not interrupt your enemy as they are making a mistake'

letting Kamala blossom is the best thing Trump could do. The idiot is campaigning against herself and allowing the fringe elements of her party to write policies she doesn't even proof read before espousing. And it's resulting in an egg in the face each and every time.

Agreed about Vivek though

but many of the backwards hick elements in our party could never stomach a little brown man as VP -- and that is truly regrettable.

Vance isn't bad... he's just not as good.

[hard R]

Agreed about Vivek though

but many of the backwards hick elements in our party could never stomach a little brown man as VP -- and that is truly regrettable.

Vance isn't bad... he's just not as good.

SO let me get this straight; you're arguing that it would be better to have chosen someone who by your own estimation is less popular among the party faithful?

Last time this id-pol shit came up you maintained it would torpedo so much of the left's efforts in that direction. I've two words for you on that score; "Larry Elder". It didn't take the "inclusive" left long to nuke all of his selling points under a barrage of patently retarded claims that he was a white supremacist and voila... the attempts to primary Newsum fell flat as a result. You think they wouldn't hesitate to level that same custard cannon at Vivek? Why do you think they were so adamant to astroturf him in the leftist media as being a more desirable option than Donald Trump?