The best topic

*

Seriously?!?!
Topic rating: 4.00

Other popular topics

Replies: 666
Total votes: : 3

Last post: May 13, 2024, 10:23:35 PM
Re: Seriously?!?! by Lokmar

avatar_Conservative Perspective

Fox News Politics Newsletter: DOJ reveals no Epstein client list

Started by Conservative Perspective, July 09, 2025, 06:17:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

formosan

Quote from: Herman on July 20, 2025, 02:42:11 PMThis is the look we want to see on the faces of every single one of Epstein's clients.
Release the files.

They must have been so embarrassed.
too old to be a fashionista

Lokmar

Quote from: Oliver the Second on July 20, 2025, 03:19:34 PMI love AI art  :crampe: 



BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! 10X RECS for that shit!!!!  :crampe:  :crampe:  :crampe:

Even called my kids in Florida to tell em to watch it!!!!

caskur

Quote from: Lokmar on July 09, 2025, 09:34:24 AMProblem is, nobody believes there isnt a client list.

There is no client list now.... there very well could have been a list.... they cannot show people what they do not have.


https://abcnews.go.com/US/jeffrey-epstein-key-victims-attorney/story?id=123805543
What we know and don't know about Jeffrey Epstein, according to key victims' attorney
The lawyer for hundreds of Epstein's victims says he's never seen a client list.

ByJames Hill
July 16, 2025,
"I think having land and not ruining it is the most beautiful art that anybody could ever want."
- Andy Warhol

DKG

After being subpoenaed by Congress, Maxwell's attorney has stated she 'will always testify truthfully.'
Just weeks ago, Americans were told that the case was closed on Jeffrey Epstein, but in a dramatic turn, Ghislaine Maxwell may be taking the stand to testify.

"Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: What do you know? At @AGPamBondi's direction, I've contacted her counsel. I intend to meet with her soon. No one is above the law — and no lead is off limits," Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in a post on X.

The House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Maxwell over the Epstein files, and her lawyer has publicly stated in response to the news that she will "always testify truthfully."

"She's going to name names," senior editor for politics and Washington correspondent for Blaze Media Christopher Bedford tells BlazeTV hosts Jill Savage and Matthew Peterson on "Blaze News: The Mandate."

DKG

Alan Dershowitz says "Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile. That term has a specific meaning. It means people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent girls or boys — that is 11, 12 years old. That's the definition of all psychiatrists and of the law. Epstein was interested in 16-year-olds, 17-year-olds, 18-year-olds," says Dershowitz, acknowledging that Epstein was nonetheless "a bad person, [who] did terrible, terrible things."

"Number two: He was not a trafficker. Traffickers make money by selling and enslaving girls. What he did is he was a selfish guy who was having sex [or] sexual contact ... with all these 16-, 17-year-olds and maybe, maybe lending them to people like Prince Andrew. We don't know for sure," he adds. "But he was not a trafficker in the true sense of the word. That's why there's no client list. There were no clients."

Lokmar

Quote from: DKG on August 05, 2025, 10:15:45 AMAlan Dershowitz says "Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile. That term has a specific meaning. It means people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent girls or boys — that is 11, 12 years old. That's the definition of all psychiatrists and of the law. Epstein was interested in 16-year-olds, 17-year-olds, 18-year-olds," says Dershowitz, acknowledging that Epstein was nonetheless "a bad person, [who] did terrible, terrible things."

"Number two: He was not a trafficker. Traffickers make money by selling and enslaving girls. What he did is he was a selfish guy who was having sex [or] sexual contact ... with all these 16-, 17-year-olds and maybe, maybe lending them to people like Prince Andrew. We don't know for sure," he adds. "But he was not a trafficker in the true sense of the word. That's why there's no client list. There were no clients."

Well, sex with 14 and under is more severe than someone banging a 17 year old, however, its still illegal. At the least, sex with a 16 or 17 year old is statutory rape. I can tell you this, if Prince Andrew was having sex with my 16yo kid, I'd want to murder him and would if the opportunity arose.

Epstein was a pimp and maybe he was a trafficker. It seems likely he was a trafficker if he was flying underaged minors to a private island for sex with old men even if he was paying them. He and Maxwell were no doubt using coercion, manipulation, and control tactics. I dont personally have evidence of this though but it doesnt matter.

Maybe its important not to muddy the definition of pedophile by lumping in a guy fucking a 16yo with someone raping babies. He's still a serial rapist amongst other things that should warrant the death penalty.

A client list would be anyone who banged these girls. It seems highly improbable that Epstein didnt keep records. Maybe not a black book per se, but that shitbag surely had documentation. Once he knew the heat was on, he should have, and likely would have destroyed all that.

Thiel

Quote from: DKG on August 05, 2025, 10:15:45 AMAlan Dershowitz says "Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile. That term has a specific meaning. It means people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent girls or boys — that is 11, 12 years old. That's the definition of all psychiatrists and of the law. Epstein was interested in 16-year-olds, 17-year-olds, 18-year-olds," says Dershowitz, acknowledging that Epstein was nonetheless "a bad person, [who] did terrible, terrible things."

"Number two: He was not a trafficker. Traffickers make money by selling and enslaving girls. What he did is he was a selfish guy who was having sex [or] sexual contact ... with all these 16-, 17-year-olds and maybe, maybe lending them to people like Prince Andrew. We don't know for sure," he adds. "But he was not a trafficker in the true sense of the word. That's why there's no client list. There were no clients."
I saw a documentary that conveyed the message that the girls were sixteen and over. And while they were coerced into having sex with men they were not physically forced into it.
gay, conservative and proud