JD Vance - Tim Walz Debate

[Biggie Smiles]

He doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now. Besides, we don't have an ignore function.

We do have an ignore function

[DKG]

We do have an ignore function

Can you post a screenshot?

[Biggie Smiles]

Can you post a screenshot?

Go into your profile ---> forum profile and click on "buddy/ignore list" and choose "edit ignore list" and then type the member name into the field provided

[JOE]

Joe still doesn't realise that Vance won the debate and his popularity has surged. He's going to be unbearable when Trump wins the election and makes America great again. Lol

According to this poll Vance has a favorable rating of 35% and an unfavorable rating of 45%:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/jd-vance/

...but as you've indicated his favorable rating has increased since the debate Lab Flaker Lab Flaker

[JOE]

He doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now. Besides, we don't have an ignore function.

Ya know DKG DKG, in a way that's true.

As a Canadian who can't contribute financially to either party or can't vote I try to remain neutral/impartial when analyzing their political situation.

As I stated earlier I thought Vance won the debate but not overwhelmingly. And the debate registered more like a discussion of America's problems than a fight where either running mate avoided making personal attacks on each other.

Anyway as a financial analyst I hope you try to remain neutral as the election outcome has a bearing on investments & the economy no matter who wins.

That's the way I look at it DKG. I'm interested in pouring some money into the markets but I'm currently sitting on the sidelines waiting until after the US elections.

2025 is a better year to invest because it will give a better indication where the economy and the markets are headed eh DKG?

[Brent]

He doesn't care who won. He posts not to contribute to discussions, but to derail them.

His trolling was fine eighteen years ago when forums were busy, but not now.

One hundred percent.

[JOE]

Here's how typical voters saw the debate:

https://www.formstack.com/admin/submission/report/49506547?share=BKhSZcZmic&view=charts

Most thought Vance won but still a large number thought Walz did.

Even if Vance won, Walz was up against someone perhaps way out of his league in the debating arena. But he held his own reasonably well considering. He was somewhat respectable. At least he didn't look like Sarah Palin and engage in complete buffoonery

Vance is a seasoned lawyer with a degree from Yale & was editor of their law review. So...even another lawyer would have a challenge debating Vance.

[Thiel]

Here's how typical voters saw the debate:

https://www.formstack.com/admin/submission/report/49506547?share=BKhSZcZmic&view=charts

Most thought Vance won but still a large number thought Walz did.

Even if Vance won, Walz was up against someone perhaps way out of his league in the debating arena. But he held his own reasonably well considering. He was somewhat respectable. At least he didn't look like Sarah Palin and engage in complete buffoonery

Vance is a seasoned lawyer with a degree from Yale & was editor of their law review. So...even another lawyer would have a challenge debating Vance.

Jo Jo, you like JD Vance's full head of hair.

[Thiel]

Tim Walz will never become the Democrat party nominee if Harris wins or loses. JD Vance stands a very good chance of becoming president before the next election in 2028 if Trump wins.

[Herman]

Go into your profile ---> forum profile and click on "buddy/ignore list" and choose "edit ignore list" and then type the member name into the field provided

I got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention.

[DKG]

I got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention.

Now that Biggie showed me how to do it, Joe is on ignore. I suggest everybody do the same.

[JOE]

I got old Joe on ignore. No old homos begging for my attention.

1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

[Biggie Smiles]

1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

Correction.

Harris + 2 biased Moderators succeeded in needling Trump

that's not a ""win"" -- that is a childish gimmick and demonstrative of a desperate campaign.

She will not be afforded such a ""win"" on the world stage with foreign leaders, many of whom, are adversaries

[Brent]

Look at Joe desperately trying to get DKG to take his boring troll bait. How pathetic.

[Thiel]

1. Trump won his Debate against Biden
2. Harris won her Debate against Trump
3. Vance won his Debate against Walz

there is that so easy to admit DKG DKG?

I suppose what somebody has to do in this forum is to overwhelmingly side with your favourite politicians on the Right to be accepted in this forum, eh?

I just take a neutral stance

Works fer me, DKG!

Sugarbunz, you know DKG did not agree or disagree with you about the debate between Trump and Harris.

Unlike me, he does not enjoy your trolling. He does not find you cute like I do. If only you would post a picture of your adorable little bald spot, people would appreciate your trolling.