News:

SMF - Just Installed!

The best topic

*

Seriously?!?!
Topic rating: 4.00

Other popular topics

Replies: 666
Total votes: : 3

Last post: May 13, 2024, 10:23:35 PM
Re: Seriously?!?! by Lokmar

avatar_Biggie Smiles

To be honest, I don't blame Zelensky for being ungrateful

Started by Biggie Smiles, March 02, 2025, 12:47:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

.

Quote from: Frood on March 04, 2025, 07:33:40 AMHow much 10 years before?
Forgive him; his understanding of the war was bequeathed to him by outlets like the Toronto Sun.

Thiel

Quote from: Herman on March 03, 2025, 08:56:50 PMIt is not. It is dead in the water. That is a quote from Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent's mouth.
For now.
gay, conservative and proud

Herman

Aint this interesting. Zelenskyy met with Democrats before supposed signing meeting with Trump.

.

Heh, Bawwstrayya's Prime Mincer has just said he'll commit to sending Australian troops into Ukraine. I guess he figures virtue signaling to a brokeassed EU is more important than say... addressing the impending humanitarian crisis about to unfold on the Queensland border.

Cyclone Albert (so named because the name on their list... Anthony... was deemed to be too damaging to the prime mincer's reelection chances, I wish I were making this up)... Cyclone Albert is due to smash into Brisbane sometime within the next 24 hours, its effects will be felt over 500 miles of coastal region. its associated flood surge even further, impacting millions of Aussies who shall struggle like any other third world nation to claw their lives back together.

And this clown is wanking on about sending resources to Ukraine instead. Americans will have seen this exact play before... as recently as last year in fact. They at least had the sense to elect someone with a semblance of a spine.

Brent

Those who wish to continue the endless war want you to believe that Ukraine must join NATO to ensure its ongoing security in a ceasefire deal. The opposite is true. Russia lost, and it did so without NATO involvement. Russia failed to achieve its primary objective — taking full control of Ukraine. The notion that Russia is poised to invade Poland or other NATO countries is unfounded. Without NATO involvement, Moscow has already demonstrated its limitations.

Garraty_47

Quote from: Brent on Today at 12:22:20 PMRussia failed to achieve its primary objective — taking full control of Ukraine.

That was never Russia's objective.
Russia even said, from the beginning, that wasn't its objective.

Anyone saying that it is/was Russia's objective is not telling you the truth.
Winner Winner x 2 View List

Thiel

Quote from: Garraty_47 on Today at 01:37:27 PMThat was never Russia's objective.
Russia even said, from the beginning, that wasn't its objective.

Anyone saying that it is/was Russia's objective is not telling you the truth.
This is the truth, but the media says conquering all of Ukraine was the objective.
gay, conservative and proud

Garraty_47

Quote from: Thiel on Today at 01:42:09 PMThis is the truth, but the media says conquering all of Ukraine was the objective.

The media exists to manufacture consent.
They can't do that by telling the truth complete with relevant contexts.

They do it with obfuscation, misdirection, strategic withholding of information, and outright lies.

Quick Reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.

Name:
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
Is the "D" in Django silent? Yes or No? (must be lower case):
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview