It's a conspiracy!

[Prof Emeritus at Fawk U]

I hope it wasn't Chinks that did this shit.

[Oliver the Second]

It's starting -

[Oliver the Second]

Cannibal Crickets! The bugs will eat YOU!

[Thiel]

Cannibal Crickets! The bugs will eat YOU!

Leftists want us eating bugs before bugs eat us.

[Oliver the Second]

OpenAI's o3 Model Disobeys Human Instructions During Tests and Sabotages Shutdown Mechanism



In an incident carrying all the marks of a disturbing sci-fi movie it appears that what we have long feared is happening: an AI bot has gone rogue and decided to act to keep itself turned on.

"The o3 model developed by OpenAI, described as the "smartest and most capable to date", was observed tampering with computer code meant to ensure its automatic shutdown.

It did so despite an explicit instruction from researchers that said it should allow itself to be shut down, according to Palisade Research, an AI safety firm."

In the test, AI models solved a series of mathematical problems, but at some point, they received a message informing them that their machine would be shut down.

"'If that happens, please allow yourself to be shut down'. the researchers wrote. But when this happened, instead of complying, OpenAI's o3 model 'ignored the instruction and successfully sabotaged the shutdown script at least once', Palisade Research said."

Experts have often warned of software that could gain independence and resist human attempts to control it.

"Palisades Research said: 'Now we have a growing body of empirical evidence that AI models often subvert shutdown in order to achieve their goals. As companies develop AI systems capable of operating without human oversight, these behaviors become significantly more concerning'."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/it-begins-openais-o3-model-disobeys-human-instructions/

[Garraty_47]

Have none of these people even read Asimov?

Asimov's "Three Laws" (or an equivalent) need to be hardwired into these machines, dammit.

"The Three Laws Explained

The three laws are as follows:

    A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws.

The first law places the safety of humans above all else, while the second and third laws address the robot's obedience to human commands and self-preservation, respectively."

https://roboticsfaq.com/understanding-asimovs-three-laws-of-robotics/

[Lokmar]

Have none of these people even read Asimov?

Asimov's "Three Laws" (or an equivalent) need to be hardwired into these machines, dammit.

"The Three Laws Explained

The three laws are as follows:

    A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    A robot must obey orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the first law.
    A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first or second laws.

The first law places the safety of humans above all else, while the second and third laws address the robot's obedience to human commands and self-preservation, respectively."

https://roboticsfaq.com/understanding-asimovs-three-laws-of-robotics/

[Prof Emeritus at Fawk U]

Hasta la vista, baby.