Sexist Police Won't Charge Dalhousie Dentistry Students

[Renee]

It's a shame the sexist Halifax police will not do what is right and just and charge these disgustingly misogynistic dental students. It's a reflection that equality is still only a pipe dream in Canada. Women and people of colour must join forces to fight the tyranny of white male privilege.

http://server2.trutube.tv/files/photos/1396599775a10e6f_l.png">

[Anonymous]

They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Stop it, you extremists lost, stop whining, admit your mistakes and get on with it.

On Wednesday, police received a package of documents from the university and reviewed it. They did not see anything that suggested a crime had occurred.

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378">http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378

[Renee]

No they made jokes and comments to each other.  No threats were made just tasteless commentary in a private group.



This case has been so distorted I can't stand it.  I actually give big credit to militant feminist bullshit.

Leo, why are you using Real Woman's handle?



They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

[Anonymous]

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

If someone clearly joked about that inside an airport, the shit would still hit the fan.



No Laughing Matter: Doctor Fined $90,000 for Bomb Joke in Airport

https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bomb-joke-gets-him-large-fine-104158537382.html">https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bo ... 37382.html">https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bomb-joke-gets-him-large-fine-104158537382.html

[Renee]

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

If someone clearly joked about that inside an airport, the shit would still hit the fan.



No Laughing Matter: Doctor Fined $90,000 for Bomb Joke in Airport

https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bomb-joke-gets-him-large-fine-104158537382.html">https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bo ... 37382.html">https://www.yahoo.com/travel/doctors-bomb-joke-gets-him-large-fine-104158537382.html

Exactly;.....Ever since the first World Trade Center Bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing ALL bomb threats in the US have been investigated as terror threats and anyone caught has been prosecuted or fined. Students get no special dispensation or consideration.



Romero is an idiot; a certifiable idiot. ac_toofunny

[Romero]

No they made jokes and comments to each other.  No threats were made just tasteless commentary in a private group.



This case has been so distorted I can't stand it.  I actually give big credit to militant feminist bullshit.

Leo, why are you using Real Woman's handle?



They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

Authorities said a 16-year-old Arizona high school student will not face charges after allegedly making a "Columbine-type" threat, and planting "dummy" explosive devices at the school and at his home.



http://www.abc15.com/web/knxv/news/region-southeast-valley/chandler/chandler-school-evacuated-after-threat-student-apprehended-with-possible-explosive-devices">//http://www.abc15.com/web/knxv/news/region-southeast-valley/chandler/chandler-school-evacuated-after-threat-student-apprehended-with-possible-explosive-devices

Two Indianapolis high school students have been expelled after they handed over a map of their school with the word "bomb" on it to their school bus driver.



No charges were filed, as no crime was committed, however, the map violated school policy and both students were expelled.



http://www.wbiw.com/state/archive/2014/02/students-expelled-following-possible-bomb-threat.php">//http://www.wbiw.com/state/archive/2014/02/students-expelled-following-possible-bomb-threat.php

[Lance Leftardashian]

They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Stop it, you extremists lost, stop whining, admit your mistakes and get on with it.

On Wednesday, police received a package of documents from the university and reviewed it. They did not see anything that suggested a crime had occurred.

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378">http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378

They were not charged because our sexist society still doesn't see women as equals of men. Men can still have their private men only clubs, in this case a Facebook group where nothing has changed since the 1950's. It is still degrading to women.



It wasn't illegal what they did, but it should be. How can women be truly free to pursue their dreams in an atmosphere of equality when this kind of sexism even in private Facebook group is still permitted?

[RW]

They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.

Making threats that were received as threats of sexual violence violate the Criminal Code by their very nature.  ac_rollseyes

One of the men involved in the so-called "DDS Gentlemen's Club" has broken his silence in an interview with the Chronicle Herald newspaper.



Ryan Millet appears in an edited video on the paper's website, talking about his role in the group.



Ryan Millet's name and photo are among 13 male names that appear on Facebook screen shots provided to CBC News in December. His photo appears in the screen shots as well.



Millet tells the Herald the Facebook group was created "during our first week in school," in 2011. He said he was added to the group, rather than joining.



He describes most of the posts as "foolish."



But he also refers to one in which the men vote on which classmate to have hate-sex with, describing that as, "extreme inappropriateness and disturbing in nature." He says a few of the men were, "very upset, disturbed by the post. We felt like the guys who posted it would come to their senses within minutes."



"That post upset me quite a bit," he says.



In the Facebook excerpts provided to CBC in December, Millet appears to be trying to persuade his classmates to get out in front of the looming scandal.



"GUYS!! RED F---ING ALERT!!!!!" writes "Ryan" in a Facebook Message, "Apparently one of the ladies has seen or heard something about the recent posts in the Gentleman's. We have to get rid of the evidence. Someone leaked it. Clean up the posts gentlemen."



The name on the screen grab is "Ryan." But in an email to CBC late Sunday night, Millet said he didn't author that post.



"That red alert post was a copy and past [sic] of a comment from another group member ... that was a private message me sending it to the person who took it to administration."



Millet's name and avatar are attached to another screen grab obtained by CBC in December. In that, he agrees with a classmate that, "an apology would sit well in our favour."



In the video posted by the Chronicle Herald Sunday, Millet says he wrote an apology letter to his classmates, which the newspaper has obtained.



Millet says he's had "positive responses" to the letter from female classmates as well as some of the men he "turned in."



The Chronicle Herald identifies Millet as the sole member of the Gentleman's Group who has decided not to participate in the university's restorative justice process.



Dalhousie University has previously said 12 of 13 men are participating.



http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/01/18/ryan-millet-dalhousie-dentistry-facebook_n_6498466.html?utm_hp_ref=canada">//http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/01/18/ryan-millet-dalhousie-dentistry-facebook_n_6498466.html?utm_hp_ref=canada

If threatening to chloroform and rape fellow students is just some joke to you, why was there so much concern about getting caught?[/quote]



So you posted all this shit which supports my claim.  "He describes most of the posts as "foolish.""  No where in there does Ryan mention anything about threatening women with sexual violence.



I'm also not going to sit down and shut up with comments like "If threatening to chloroform and rape fellow students is just some joke to you..."  Typical silencing tactic when challenged.  FAIL!



I am sure they didn't want their shit talking to get out for this very reason.  Can you blame them?

[RW]

They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Stop it, you extremists lost, stop whining, admit your mistakes and get on with it.

On Wednesday, police received a package of documents from the university and reviewed it. They did not see anything that suggested a crime had occurred.

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378">http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/1.2905378

They were not charged because our sexist society still doesn't see women as equals of men. Men can still have their private men only clubs, in this case a Facebook group where nothing has changed since the 1950's. It is still degrading to women.



It wasn't illegal what they did, but it should be. How can women be truly free to pursue their dreams in an atmosphere of equality when this kind of sexism even in private Facebook group is still permitted?

Do you think women don't shit talk men on Facebook?  HAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Renee]

Leo, why are you using Real Woman's handle?



They did make threats. Police found they didn't violate the Criminal Code.



When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

Authorities said a 16-year-old Arizona high school student will not face charges after allegedly making a "Columbine-type" threat, and planting "dummy" explosive devices at the school and at his home.



http://www.abc15.com/web/knxv/news/region-southeast-valley/chandler/chandler-school-evacuated-after-threat-student-apprehended-with-possible-explosive-devices">//http://www.abc15.com/web/knxv/news/region-southeast-valley/chandler/chandler-school-evacuated-after-threat-student-apprehended-with-possible-explosive-devices

Two Indianapolis high school students have been expelled after they handed over a map of their school with the word "bomb" on it to their school bus driver.



No charges were filed, as no crime was committed, however, the map violated school policy and both students were expelled.



http://www.wbiw.com/state/archive/2014/02/students-expelled-following-possible-bomb-threat.php">//http://www.wbiw.com/state/archive/2014/02/students-expelled-following-possible-bomb-threat.php

First of all these are incidents involving minors. Kids sometimes point their fingers at each other and go "bang" as well, they aren't prosecuted for that either.



If you bothered to watch all the video and the two subsequent videos, you would have seen that charges may still be filed in the Chandler School incident. At this point the 16 year old in question has been remanded to the custody of his parents but county attorneys are still investigating and charges could still be filed. Unfortunately it looks like this was a case of revenge for bulling and there may be more to this than meets the eye. An investigation that uncovers an emotionally distraught child doesn't necessary lead to criminal charges.



The second incident again involved minors and drawing a map and then drawing a bomb on it is not a credible threat, any more than the rape/threat accusations that the dental students are allegedly guilty of. As your link states; "no crime was committed".



Again, you don't get it and you are unable to make the distinction between real and credible threats and uncouth or inappropriate speech or behavior. This is what makes your ignorant kind so dangerous.



BTW, let's confine the discussion to credible threats, shall we? Otherwise we are playing around in your ignorant fantasy land version of the law.

[Anonymous]

Making threats that were received as threats of sexual violence violate the Criminal Code by their very nature.  ac_rollseyes



So you posted all this shit which supports my claim.  "He describes most of the posts as "foolish.""  No where in there does Ryan mention anything about threatening women with sexual violence.



I'm also not going to sit down and shut up with comments like "If threatening to chloroform and rape fellow students is just some joke to you..."  Typical silencing tactic when challenged.  FAIL!



I am sure they didn't want their shit talking to get out for this very reason.  Can you blame them?

This is over. No charges from the cops because no law was broken. If nothing was illegal, then it should be case closed. The Romeros of the world tried and convicted them in the biggest kangaroo court of all....the court of public opinion. A very dangerous thing to do.

[Romero]

First of all these are incidents involving minors. Kids sometimes point their fingers at each other and go "bang" as well, they aren't prosecuted for that either.



If you bothered to watch all the video and the two subsequent videos, you would have seen that charges may still be filed in the Chandler School incident. At this point the 16 year old in question has been remanded to the custody of his parents but county attorneys are still investigating and charges could still be filed. Unfortunately it looks like this was a case of revenge for bulling and there may be more to this than meets the eye. An investigation that uncovers an emotionally distraught child doesn't necessary lead to criminal charges.



The second incident again involved minors and drawing a map and then drawing a bomb on it is not a credible threat, any more than the rape/threat accusations that the dental students are allegedly guilty of. As your link states; "no crime was committed".



Again, you don't get it and you are unable to make the distinction between real and credible threats and uncouth or inappropriate speech or behavior. This is what makes your ignorant kind so dangerous.



BTW, let's confine the discussion to credible threats, shall we? Otherwise we are playing around in your ignorant fantasy land version of the law.

When students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

Name one time where that ever happened.



I don't know how you mush headed Canadians view this but in the US, bomb threats are considered "terroristic threats" and are punishable under the law. I don't think in the past 25 years there has ever been an incident where someone making a bomb threat (student or otherwise) has been excused from prosecution.



How the hell can you make such a ludicrous statement and expect anyone to take it seriously. Get a clue you leftard dunce.

I said students, you said students, and I gave you two examples.



Most minors are charged, but when students make bomb threats, they are taken seriously but may not result in criminal charges.

[Renee]

Making threats that were received as threats of sexual violence violate the Criminal Code by their very nature.  ac_rollseyes



So you posted all this shit which supports my claim.  "He describes most of the posts as "foolish.""  No where in there does Ryan mention anything about threatening women with sexual violence.



I'm also not going to sit down and shut up with comments like "If threatening to chloroform and rape fellow students is just some joke to you..."  Typical silencing tactic when challenged.  FAIL!



I am sure they didn't want their shit talking to get out for this very reason.  Can you blame them?

This is over. No charges from the cops because no law was broken. If nothing was illegal, then it should be case closed. The Romeros of the world tried and convicted them in the biggest kangaroo court of all....the court of public opinion.

No, it's the "court of progressive PC opinion". It's an opinion driven entirely along ideological lines and it is very dangerous to our personal liberties. Ignorance of this dangerous way of thinking by the Romeros of the world will lead to an Orwellian police state if we are not careful.

[Romero]

This is over. No charges from the cops because no law was broken. If nothing was illegal, then it should be case closed. The Romeros of the world tried and convicted them in the biggest kangaroo court of all....the court of public opinion. A very dangerous thing to do.

I never said there should have been charges. That's up to the police. I've only been saying that threatening violence and rape is wrong and I agree with the university taking disciplinary action.

[RW]

This is over. No charges from the cops because no law was broken. If nothing was illegal, then it should be case closed. The Romeros of the world tried and convicted them in the biggest kangaroo court of all....the court of public opinion. A very dangerous thing to do.

I never said there should have been charges. That's up to the police. I've only been saying that threatening violence and rape is wrong and I agree with the university taking disciplinary action.

Sure threatening violence and to rape someone is extremely wrong.  I would expect anyone who truly feels threatened by either of those things to have the full protection of the law.  That didn't happen here and that's been supported not only by the evidence you have provided, but by the evidence you seem to want to dance around.



I don't agree with a career sentence for making stupid comments in a private Facebook group.  That is too stiff a penalty for lack of an actual crime.