Can we perp walk the wookie now?

[Biggie Smiles]

[Lokmar]

I hope they fix her eyes straight in prison!!!

[Biggie Smiles]

I think Scott Jennings is great but why do we as conservatives always feel like we have to take the high moral ground when the scum on the left attempts to corner us with trick moral questions

the CNN scumbag pundint asks "but isn't this a case of two wrongs don't make a right"

and scott dodges

whereas  I'd be saying hell yeah, with a generous portion you fuck around and find out and a side order of "karma bitch"

Listen, I don't give a fuck if Trump is going after these people for retribution. After what they've pulled he has every right in the world to do so. The only thing I care about is that a) the evidence against them is not doctored and b) they have a fair trial.

that's it.

The prosecutorial motivation is inconsequential at this point and motive, in itself, does not change the physiology of the facts.. so you can take your line of questioning, your pitful Gotcha's and your entire gammut of bullshit and shove it right back up your ass is what I'd be saying

in fact, I PREFER a president who believes in getbacks... getbacks is the only language these cockroaches understand! for far too long we have singled that we are the sort that will turn the other cheek when they do us wrong. Where has that gotten us

now lets be the FAFO and see what fruit that yields

[Prof Emeritus at Fawk U]

I think Scott Jennings is great but why do we as conservatives always feel like we have to take the high moral ground when the scum on the left attempts to corner us with trick moral questions

the CNN scumbag pundint asks "but isn't this a case of two wrongs don't make a right"

and scott dodges

whereas  I'd be saying hell yeah, with a generous portion you fuck around and find out and a side order of "karma bitch"

Listen, I don't give a fuck if Trump is going after these people for retribution. After what they've pulled he has every right in the world to do so. The only thing I care about is that a) the evidence against them is not doctored and b) they have a fair trial.

that's it.

The prosecutorial motivation is inconsequential at this point and motive, in itself, does not change the physiology of the facts.. so you can take your line of questioning, your pitful Gotcha's and your entire gammut of bullshit and shove it right back up your ass is what I'd be saying

in fact, I PREFER a president who believes in getbacks... getbacks is the only language these cockroaches understand! for far too long we have singled that we are the sort that will turn the other cheek when they do us wrong. Where has that gotten us

now lets be the FAFO and see what fruit that yields

And I'm very wrong for assuming that you're a font of compassion.   

[Lokmar]

I think Scott Jennings is great but why do we as conservatives always feel like we have to take the high moral ground when the scum on the left attempts to corner us with trick moral questions

the CNN scumbag pundint asks "but isn't this a case of two wrongs don't make a right"

and scott dodges

whereas  I'd be saying hell yeah, with a generous portion you fuck around and find out and a side order of "karma bitch"

Listen, I don't give a fuck if Trump is going after these people for retribution. After what they've pulled he has every right in the world to do so. The only thing I care about is that a) the evidence against them is not doctored and b) they have a fair trial.

that's it.

The prosecutorial motivation is inconsequential at this point and motive, in itself, does not change the physiology of the facts.. so you can take your line of questioning, your pitful Gotcha's and your entire gammut of bullshit and shove it right back up your ass is what I'd be saying

in fact, I PREFER a president who believes in getbacks... getbacks is the only language these cockroaches understand! for far too long we have singled that we are the sort that will turn the other cheek when they do us wrong. Where has that gotten us

now lets be the FAFO and see what fruit that yields

All this but most importantly, this stupid cunt lied on mortgage paperwork obviously, intentionally, and MULTIPLE times!!!!

[Herman]

I watched it up until the part about Le Tit James being indicted. I like that.

[Reggie Essent]

I think Scott Jennings is great but why do we as conservatives always feel like we have to take the high moral ground when the scum on the left attempts to corner us with trick moral questions

the CNN scumbag pundint asks "but isn't this a case of two wrongs don't make a right"

and scott dodges

whereas  I'd be saying hell yeah, with a generous portion you fuck around and find out and a side order of "karma bitch"

Listen, I don't give a fuck if Trump is going after these people for retribution. After what they've pulled he has every right in the world to do so. The only thing I care about is that a) the evidence against them is not doctored and b) they have a fair trial.

that's it.

The prosecutorial motivation is inconsequential at this point and motive, in itself, does not change the physiology of the facts.. so you can take your line of questioning, your pitful Gotcha's and your entire gammut of bullshit and shove it right back up your ass is what I'd be saying

in fact, I PREFER a president who believes in getbacks... getbacks is the only language these cockroaches understand! for far too long we have singled that we are the sort that will turn the other cheek when they do us wrong. Where has that gotten us

now lets be the FAFO and see what fruit that yields

I am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.

[Herman]

I am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.

So do I. Settle scores. Do not let that shit happen again.

[Shen Li]

The WH has to stop that vindictive twat before she strikes.

[Biggie Smiles]

I am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.

I have no problem whatsoever with Trump being out for revenge. Anyone that has gone through what he went through would.

and I hope he gets it to.


and as long as it's legal and on the up and up I am 100% behind him

[.]

I am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.

And wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!

[Biggie Smiles]

And wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!

utterly amazing and outright shameless that this fucking Wookie would even suggest the US tax payer were somehow swindled during these transactions between private entities.


Deutsche bank isn't even a U.S based bank!  It is a German multinational investment bank

With a risk management department which probably eclipses the entirety of the whole trump organization in terms of total number of employees.

And her stake was that he, the junior entity in these private arraignments managed to hood wink a player of that size and this private transaction, and that such deception hurt the us taxpayer?

Is she fucking serious?

If anything. Such deception of a foreign based lender would HELP the US taxpayer as it would create jobs and generate revenue in THIS country

Good lord the idiots on the left are fucking stupid

[Biggie Smiles]

I swear, the average leftist who cheered the criminality that Latisha and Engron engaged in here should be euthanized immediately

before they've had a chance to procreate and further infect  humanity with their loathsome lineage.

You dumb fucks never heard of a concept called precedent?

If they can successfully pull off this level of gross injustice on a former president billionaire who at the time had a very good chance of becoming president once again they can do it to ANYONE.


And they will use such precedent against anyone. Rest assured.

Love him or hate him a process that deliberately broken should scare you.

[Brent]

And wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!

That is right. She ripped off taxpayers.

[.]

I swear, the average leftist who cheered the criminality that Latisha and Engron engaged in here should be euthanized immediately

before they've had a chance to procreate and further infect  humanity with their loathsome lineage.

You dumb fucks never heard of a concept called precedent?

If they can successfully pull off this level of gross injustice on a former president billionaire who at the time had a very good chance of becoming president once again they can do it to ANYONE.

Right, and it is. It's being done to the commie animal who set the precedent.

Actually, I understand that it could have been done before, only that nobody really cared to. Regardless, it's a genie that's out of the bottle now. Expect it again and again going forwards.

And that, I suspect, is the whole point. I don't believe the commie animal came up with this on her own bat, I reckon someone else (likely foreign) pushed her to it, secure in the knowledge that it would open the door to further court cases and that the commie animal would very likely be one of them.

After all, when taking out a country with three co-equal branches of government, destroying one of those branches by tying it up in endless shitbaggery would seem to be a step in the right direction, no?