The US voting system is one of the most corrupt in the world

[Obvious Li]

Just another example from Ohio.....



Ohio Vote Totals For Barack Obama A Statistical Miracle!



By Tom Tillison

Florida Political Press



Front Page Magazine is reporting that Barack Obama won Wood County in Ohio this year with 108% of registered voters. That's not a typo.



In 2012, 106,258 people in Wood County are registered to vote out of an eligible 98,213. This is not to say that the 108% registered all voted for Obama, just that more people are registered than eligible.



Perhaps even more astonishing is FPM reports that he won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland. Think about that... Ohio voters had 7 presidential candidates to choose from, plus the option to write in candidates of their choosing, yet every last voter in 21 districts chose Obama.



Gary Johnson, the candidate for disaffected Libertarians who received 43,479 votes here in Florida, was on the Ohio Ballot. And while Roseanne Barr was not, she did make it on the Florida ballot and the 7,971 misguided souls that voted for her shows that there are always going to be those who choose to follow their own path. Always.



Except in Cleveland, Ohio.



Is that not a stunning consideration? As of early September, voting registration lists totaled 900,135 in Cuyahoga County, which makes up much of the Cleveland metropolitan area, so exactly how many votes do 15 districts represent? Thousands... tens of thousands?



Yet every last one, down to a man voted for Barack Obama – a statistical miracle!



Reports such as this are sure to trickle out around the country for weeks to come. We have become a very sick society and considering the current President of the United States once taught Saul Alinksy in college, who's philosophy is the ends justify the means, rampant corruption should not come as a surprise.



While you may expect a thorough investigation to be launched, particularly so considering Ohio has a Republican governor, with a negligent media sure to suppress the story and an Obama Administration that can stonewall with the best of them (Fast & Furious, Benghazi), and with the American people ready to move on from the election, this is going nowhere fast.



And as long as the citizens of this country continue to deny the corruption exists, justify it in whatever manner or just look the other way, they are bringing irreparable harm upon future generations, who will ultimately pay the price for this lack of courage.



Unfortunately, any efforts to address the issue end up being hijacked by demagogues, with the Democratic Party typically pushing back for even fewer controls and accusing Republicans of racism and voter suppression, regardless of the proposal put forth.



Times that try men's souls...

[Romero]

Many voters weren't on the registration list. When they show up to vote and they're not on the list, they show ID and they're re-registered. With a high turnout there will be more voters than the number of voters on the registration list.



There were districts where zero people voted for Romney. There were also districts where few to no people voted for Obama.

[Securious]

voter manipulation  ie.--cheating

[Romero]

[size=150]Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud[/size]

Videographer James O'Keefe

 



And Obama "likely" won re-election by over 3,000,000 votes.

[Romero]

Just wait 'till all the lawsuits start rolling in. This is going to be huge! How dare African-Americans vote for who they want!



Infowars, eh? Hurricane Sandy was caused by HAARP.

[Romero]

I've uncovered yet more voter fraud:

Maine GOP Chair Alleges That Blacks Voted



Charlie Webster, the outgoing Maine Republican chairman, claimed Wednesday in an interview that "hundreds" of black voters cast ballots in rural Maine towns, contributing to the party's losses.



"In some parts of rural Maine, there were dozens, dozens of black people who came in and voted on Election Day," he said in an interview with WSCH TV. "Everybody has the right to vote, but nobody in town knows anybody that's black -- how did that happen? I don't know. We're going to find out."



Webster stood by the claim in an interview with the Portland Press Herald. "I'm not talking about 15 or 20. I'm talking hundreds," he said.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/charlie-webster-maine-gop_n_2136055.html">//http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/charlie-webster-maine-gop_n_2136055.html

[Obvious Li]

I've uncovered yet more voter fraud:

Maine GOP Chair Alleges That Blacks Voted



Charlie Webster, the outgoing Maine Republican chairman, claimed Wednesday in an interview that "hundreds" of black voters cast ballots in rural Maine towns, contributing to the party's losses.



"In some parts of rural Maine, there were dozens, dozens of black people who came in and voted on Election Day," he said in an interview with WSCH TV. "Everybody has the right to vote, but nobody in town knows anybody that's black -- how did that happen? I don't know. We're going to find out."



Webster stood by the claim in an interview with the Portland Press Herald. "I'm not talking about 15 or 20. I'm talking hundreds," he said.



http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/charlie-webster-maine-gop_n_2136055.html">//http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/charlie-webster-maine-gop_n_2136055.html

ya ..those nasty voting black folks....why why...maybe they voted democrat even :?:

[Gary Oak]

Over the last few days I have watched as political "analysts" and assorted pundits alternately lamented and rejoiced and "analyzed" the results of the recent election.



I have watched and listened as self-important, self-appointed authorities opined and pontificated on the "reasons" for Romney's loss.



And, as I removed myself from the emotional turmoil that surrounds this event, and as I examined the actual data, I arrived at a conclusion at odds with all these "experts" and purveyors of "correct" viewpoint: Romney didn't lose.



Oh, the election boards and Secretaries of State and other officials have "deemed" that Obama won the election, but the truth is rather otherwise.



What Obama won was the vote count. Remember the maxim from Josef Stalin: "It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes."



I predicted that the only way Romney would lose was through vote fraud. As the election returns are now being finalized, we discover that in several districts the final counts added up to more than 100% of the actual registered voters in those areas. The "traditional" Press is, of course, entirely uninterested and incurious about these results, as we would expect from a Fourth-Estate-as-Fifth-Column media community.



Okay, fine, we now know that the election results are fraudulent, and we likewise know that the authorities and media will never acknowledge that possibility. What we now have is an "election" outcome that's "official" but not legal, "official" but not true, "official" but for which the actual evidence will be destroyed, or already has been.



There is, however, a truth that will only be buried if we allow it to be. Romney didn't lose. Romney won the support of a significant majority of Americans. The pretender in the White House knows this, his aides know this, and the people who mechanized this outcome know this. Oh, and the Press either knows it or suspects it, and is now deep enough into it that exposing it would mean revealing their own collusion and perfidy.



The reality, though, remains: the real, true majority of Americans did not ask for this outcome, did not support this result, and actually desire something very different from the plans they know this false president has for the nation.



Here is how it's supposed to work: you know that you voted for Romney (or against Obama), but now you're supposed to believe that "everybody else" wanted Obama. The "overwhelming majority" of people want Obama, want his policies, and want you to suffer. That's what the Press will tell you, that's what the authorities will tell you, that's what the "official" version will be.



You are now supposed to "accept" your fate. You are now supposed to sit down and shut up. You are now supposed to "accept" the so-called "will of the people." That's what you're supposed to do.



YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO GIVE UP. YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO SUCCUMB. You're SUPPOSED to stop fighting, stop resisting, stop speaking out.



Well?



Yeah, okay, I can't prove any of that. I don't have any evidence that supports it. What I DO have is an analytic mind and a series of observations that inform me that the "result" we got is not supported by the events leading up to it.



So what I know and what I can prove are at odds. But there are times when you have to act on what you know, even when you're being falsely told that what you know is wrong.



I'm still formulating how I need to proceed in light of this new understanding, but what I know, and what I need to factor into my future calculations is the fact that we — the people who love our country and favor fiscal sanity and subscribe to the ideals of the Founders — are not outnumbered. We remain in the majority.



I can't remember ever having been here. I grew up in the '60s, but served in the military rather than in Haight-Ashbury. I raised my family to be responsible and self-sufficient, just as my parents did. I guess you could say I was more or less aligned with the "establishment" of the day, even though I have for years disagreed with the trend toward more socialism and fascism.



Today, the Establishment has crossed a line. They have arrayed themselves against the majority of the American people.



I won't be joining them. I won't be agreeing with them. I won't be accepting their "truth." I will, instead, stand for my truth. And I suspect I am not alone.



The usurpers (for I can't reasonably refer to them otherwise) are now the "establishment" even though they are really in the minority.



So... that makes us... what?



Well, what do you call someone who stands against the Establishment?



Feels kinda odd to be in those shoes, doesn't it?



Welcome to the Resistance.

    I am not sure that the real power brokers would allow something as immensley powerful to be in the hands of voters who they know are often as airheaded as Romero



Romney Did Not Lose



Get Trevor Loudon's NEW book: Barack Obama and the Enemies Within



2012-11-12 16:03:55



Source: http://www.trevorloudon.com/2012/11/romney-did-not-lose/">http://www.trevorloudon.com/2012/11/rom ... -not-lose/">http://www.trevorloudon.com/2012/11/romney-did-not-lose/

[Romero]

Yeah, okay, I can't prove any of that. I don't have any evidence that supports it.

  Well, that's all the proof and evidence I need!

[Obvious Li]

Yeah, okay, I can't prove any of that. I don't have any evidence that supports it.

  Well, that's all the proof and evidence I need!

hesus Romeo..you folded up like a cheap tent....?????

[Gary Oak]

Yeah, okay, I can't prove any of that. I don't have any evidence that supports it.

  Well, that's all the proof and evidence I need!

     That's an interesting quote that you have dreamt up that I made.

[Romero]

I quoted the post you made. I never claimed that you said those words.

[Gary Oak]

and you altered it in a way making it look like I had wrote that myself....lioke the slimy little fag that you are

[Romero]

I didn't alter anything. I quoted the post you made.



There, I fixed it.

[Gary Oak]

You are a phony miserable fag