Gaybook

[Anonymous]

I dunno Dove, Im just not the kind of guy that would make a stink over something that's been going on for years. It honestly dosent bother me and if it did i would go to my mother in laws or to the lake , sky dive, have sex under the bridge on 5th.



See what im getting at? There is always some where to go....

Oh I do see. I'm not making a stink, per say. Im just pointing out that people actions and choices impact others, and harmony and equality are just not ever going to be possible. One group will always force their ways and views on others.

Just like you are forcing your ways on a gay pride parade?

 No I'm not.

[Frood]

I dunno Dove, Im just not the kind of guy that would make a stink over something that's been going on for years. It honestly dosent bother me and if it did i would go to my mother in laws or to the lake , sky dive, have sex under the bridge on 5th.



See what im getting at? There is always some where to go....

It's like Christmas morning and New Years Eve. I don't agree with a lot of the content, don't want my kids watching that stuff, so I either change the channel on the telly or turn it off. A few hours later and it's all over until the next year. Easy as.

 Well here in Murica, you can host a porn parade in the middle of the street but you can't put a nativity on your lawn during Christmas. Did I say Christmas? Because they changed that to "holidays".

That's not right. It's private property. Anyone should be able to put virtually anything they like on their lawns or call Christmas what they want to call it.

[Anonymous]

No fuck the gays because Princess Dove is precious, right?

 This had absolutely nothing to do with homosexuality.  Ive had sex with a lot of women. Have you ever turned a straight girl gay? I have...lol.  This isn't about homosexuality. It's about drawing a line on when and where adult activities take place.

Last pride parade I went to, no one was fucking in the street.



And dreary, you are not the only woman in this place to have fucked another female.

 Again, what goes on here in the states sounds different than what goes on here.  And I didn't say I was the only one, did i?  I was pointing out that I have "fucked the gays", albeit not in the way you have assumed

[Anonymous]

I dunno Dove, Im just not the kind of guy that would make a stink over something that's been going on for years. It honestly dosent bother me and if it did i would go to my mother in laws or to the lake , sky dive, have sex under the bridge on 5th.



See what im getting at? There is always some where to go....

It's like Christmas morning and New Years Eve. I don't agree with a lot of the content, don't want my kids watching that stuff, so I either change the channel on the telly or turn it off. A few hours later and it's all over until the next year. Easy as.

 Well here in Murica, you can host a porn parade in the middle of the street but you can't put a nativity on your lawn during Christmas. Did I say Christmas? Because they changed that to "holidays".

That's not right. It's private property. Anyone should be able to put virtually anything they like on their lawns or call Christmas what they want to call it.

Yeah, you'd think so.  But the "pc" crap is so overwhelming here that if your Christain expression on your own lawn offends your nieghbor, you'll probably be forced to remove it. There was a family last year whose nativity pissed off a woman down their street....and when the couple refused to comply, they were harassed and vandalized.

[RW]

Forced to remove it by someone other than the police though.

[Anonymous]

It's still bullshit.

[RW]

Just like its bullshit that you rain on a pride parade.

[Anonymous]

Just like its bullshit that you rain on a pride parade.

No. Public isn't the same as private. And on that note....if I hosted a party with people out on my lawn at ANY time wearing underwear and making out....jail time would be had. Just sayin.

[@realAzhyaAryola]

"Gay Pride" Parades, Nudity, and Nihilism

 Written by  Selwyn Duke



http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/15886-gay-pride-parades-nudity-and-nihilism">http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... d-nihilism">http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/15886-gay-pride-parades-nudity-and-nihilism



Bolstered by the Supreme Court's recent DOMA decision, it is reported that two million people attended this past Sunday's homosexual "Pride" parade in New York City. This mirrors increased attendance in such parades nationwide, with participants eager to celebrate what is viewed as a milestone in the advancement of the homosexual agenda.



As per usual, the "Pride" events were supported by liberal politicians and celebrities. Writes CBS New York:



Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and other political leaders marched in the [NYC] parade. Mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner also courted support in the crowd speaking to spectators through a bullhorn, and Public Advocate and candidate Bill de Blasio also marched.



... Serving as this year's grand marshal is musician and activist Harry Belafonte.



... Lady Gaga kicked off the weekend of celebrations with an appearance and performance at the pride rally in TriBeCa.



... Gov. Cuomo also launched the "I Love NY LGBT" tourism website.



In attendance as well was City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who hopes to become NYC's first openly homosexual mayor.



As for notables making appearances elsewhere, CBS writes:



In Chicago, the parade down Halsted Street, Broadway and Diversey Parkway in the city's Boystown and East Lakeview districts was expected to top last year's record attendance of 850,000 people in the wake of the DOMA decision, WBBM Newsradio reported. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn were among the participants, and retired NHL player Wade Davis served as grand marshal.



Yet the picture of unity presented by the media belies the controversy over homosexual parades bubbling beneath the surface. Much of this centers around the nudity and simulated sex acts that are staples of such events and the double standard that allows for them in violation of local decency laws. As Peter LaBarbera writes about what he witnessed during Chicago "Pride" parades:

In 2004, a disgusting gay (oral-anal) sex act that was allowed to go on in the middle of the street (children were seen nearby) — right in front of a row of Chicago cops — involving two guys who were trying to get under the skin of a group of Christian protesters whom the cops were protecting;...

in 2007, a male transvestite (?) going topless with "his" breasts exposed for block after block as cops and parade organizers did nothing; see: http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry ... arade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html

lewd acts (e.g., simulated sodomy) and gyrating sexual dances on floats — including one by an apparent lesbian cop who appeared to be drunk or high, riding atop a Chicago PD float;

a contingent of sadomasochists marching in the parades as they do every year;

blatant anti-religious and anti-conservative bigotry on display — usually equating Christianity or the Catholic Church with "hate";

after the 2007 parade, homosexual "pride" celebrants assaulted two peaceful men giving a Christian street witness in opposition to homosexuality; see http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry ... arade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html;

a homosexual bathhouse called "Steamworks," which fields a float every year at the parade. Steamworks is a 24/7 sex club on Halsted Street in Boystown where men go for anonymous sexual liaisons with other men.



In his article LaBarbera points out that the young often witness the above and asks, "Should children attend lewd 'Gay Pride' parades?"



This also raises another serious question: The clarion call among homosexual activists has long been that they just want to be treated like everyone else. So will the authorities ever grant them their wish? As columnist Joe Warmington wrote in 2009 about Toronto's homosexual parade:



"There is frequent nudity and mock sex acts on our main street and that is against the law."



— Rev. Charles McVety



Will there be as many indecent exposure charges handed out this Gay Pride weekend as there will be parking tickets?



... McVety [president of Canada Christian College] says it really comes down to nothing more than enforcing the law of the land equally — and making sure there is not a two-tiered system in which people associated with a powerful movement get away with breaking laws that those not as connected could not.



... police have in the past charged participants for nudity — only to have charges dropped because it was successfully argued the suspects were wearing shoes.



It was not specified on what part of the body the shoes were worn.



In fact, this double standard is now being enshrined in law. Spurred to action by a group of men who habitually display their birthday suits in the city's homosexual Castro district, notoriously libertine San Francisco recently enacted an ordinance prohibiting the exposure of one's genitalia in public (nudity, per se, was not previously illegal in SF). Yet exceptions are made for "the city's annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures," writes CNS News.  



It is this apparent hypocrisy that rankles many critics. For while the homosexual movement purports to be concerned with equality, one may ask: Is it really about making some Americans more equal than others?

[Frood]

"Gay Pride" Parades, Nudity, and Nihilism

 Written by  Selwyn Duke



http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/15886-gay-pride-parades-nudity-and-nihilism">http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/po ... d-nihilism">http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/15886-gay-pride-parades-nudity-and-nihilism



Bolstered by the Supreme Court's recent DOMA decision, it is reported that two million people attended this past Sunday's homosexual "Pride" parade in New York City. This mirrors increased attendance in such parades nationwide, with participants eager to celebrate what is viewed as a milestone in the advancement of the homosexual agenda.



As per usual, the "Pride" events were supported by liberal politicians and celebrities. Writes CBS New York:



Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Gov. Andrew Cuomo and other political leaders marched in the [NYC] parade. Mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner also courted support in the crowd speaking to spectators through a bullhorn, and Public Advocate and candidate Bill de Blasio also marched.



... Serving as this year's grand marshal is musician and activist Harry Belafonte.



... Lady Gaga kicked off the weekend of celebrations with an appearance and performance at the pride rally in TriBeCa.



... Gov. Cuomo also launched the "I Love NY LGBT" tourism website.



In attendance as well was City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, who hopes to become NYC's first openly homosexual mayor.



As for notables making appearances elsewhere, CBS writes:



In Chicago, the parade down Halsted Street, Broadway and Diversey Parkway in the city's Boystown and East Lakeview districts was expected to top last year's record attendance of 850,000 people in the wake of the DOMA decision, WBBM Newsradio reported. Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn were among the participants, and retired NHL player Wade Davis served as grand marshal.



Yet the picture of unity presented by the media belies the controversy over homosexual parades bubbling beneath the surface. Much of this centers around the nudity and simulated sex acts that are staples of such events and the double standard that allows for them in violation of local decency laws. As Peter LaBarbera writes about what he witnessed during Chicago "Pride" parades:

In 2004, a disgusting gay (oral-anal) sex act that was allowed to go on in the middle of the street (children were seen nearby) — right in front of a row of Chicago cops — involving two guys who were trying to get under the skin of a group of Christian protesters whom the cops were protecting;...

in 2007, a male transvestite (?) going topless with "his" breasts exposed for block after block as cops and parade organizers did nothing; see: http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry ... arade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html

lewd acts (e.g., simulated sodomy) and gyrating sexual dances on floats — including one by an apparent lesbian cop who appeared to be drunk or high, riding atop a Chicago PD float;

a contingent of sadomasochists marching in the parades as they do every year;

blatant anti-religious and anti-conservative bigotry on display — usually equating Christianity or the Catholic Church with "hate";

after the 2007 parade, homosexual "pride" celebrants assaulted two peaceful men giving a Christian street witness in opposition to homosexuality; see http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry ... arade.html">http://americansfortruth.com/news/angry-mob-assaults-peaceful-christians-at-chicago-gay-pride-parade.html;

a homosexual bathhouse called "Steamworks," which fields a float every year at the parade. Steamworks is a 24/7 sex club on Halsted Street in Boystown where men go for anonymous sexual liaisons with other men.



In his article LaBarbera points out that the young often witness the above and asks, "Should children attend lewd 'Gay Pride' parades?"



This also raises another serious question: The clarion call among homosexual activists has long been that they just want to be treated like everyone else. So will the authorities ever grant them their wish? As columnist Joe Warmington wrote in 2009 about Toronto's homosexual parade:



"There is frequent nudity and mock sex acts on our main street and that is against the law."



— Rev. Charles McVety



Will there be as many indecent exposure charges handed out this Gay Pride weekend as there will be parking tickets?



... McVety [president of Canada Christian College] says it really comes down to nothing more than enforcing the law of the land equally — and making sure there is not a two-tiered system in which people associated with a powerful movement get away with breaking laws that those not as connected could not.



... police have in the past charged participants for nudity — only to have charges dropped because it was successfully argued the suspects were wearing shoes.



It was not specified on what part of the body the shoes were worn.



In fact, this double standard is now being enshrined in law. Spurred to action by a group of men who habitually display their birthday suits in the city's homosexual Castro district, notoriously libertine San Francisco recently enacted an ordinance prohibiting the exposure of one's genitalia in public (nudity, per se, was not previously illegal in SF). Yet exceptions are made for "the city's annual gay pride event and the Folsom Street Fair, which celebrates sadomasochism and other sexual subcultures," writes CNS News.  



It is this apparent hypocrisy that rankles many critics. For while the homosexual movement purports to be concerned with equality, one may ask: Is it really about making some Americans more equal than others?

I take those sources with a big grain of salt. Bozell (CNS), the Buckley's, LaBarbera, John Birch Society, and the AFTAH plus their spinoffs and sister organizations aren't exactly known for balanced policy or social commentary over the years and decades.

[RW]

If nudity is an issue, it's time to talk to organizers about it and see if they can find a solution together.

[@realAzhyaAryola]

I take those sources with a big grain of salt. Bozell (CNS), the Buckley's, LaBarbera, John Birch Society, and the AFTAH plus their spinoffs and sister organizations aren't exactly known for balanced policy or social commentary over the years and decades.

I can appreciate your passion for your principles and beliefs but we, opponents of the obscene displays in our streets, are just as passionate about our own principles, values, and beliefs. We are not here to learn something new. This is how we feel about it and we are just as unbudging as you are. We, like you with your position, stand just as firmly with ours. I'm pleased to know there are still those who have the same views as I about this matter. This pleases me. I want to believe that the lawmakers we elect into office who approve important decisions stick to the law and not bend it for the convenience of certain groups and their agenda. As a concerned citizen and a stakeholder, I am well within my rights to expect this.



The body is a beautiful creation. As a John Mayer song goes, your body is a wonderland. However, please don't display it lewdly and obscenely. That is all I ask. There's a place for that freedom any time and anywhere but not on Main Street.

[Frood]

If nudity is an issue, it's time to talk to organizers about it and see if they can find a solution together.

A good compromise might be to allow topless but not bottomless. If it's designed to have pubes around it, keep it covered? Most people already do this as a matter of instinct but for the very odd ones out at these parades who like to freeball or freelip it, maybe they need to have a basic ground rule like that set in stone.

[RW]

Here in Canada, women have challenged topless laws and won so they are no longer being charged with indecency for being shirtless in public.

[Frood]

I take those sources with a big grain of salt. Bozell (CNS), the Buckley's, LaBarbera, John Birch Society, and the AFTAH plus their spinoffs and sister organizations aren't exactly known for balanced policy or social commentary over the years and decades.

I can appreciate your passion for your principles and beliefs but we, opponents of the obscene displays in our streets, are just as passionate about our own principles, values, and beliefs. We are not here to learn something new. This is how we feel about it and we are just as unbudging as you are. We, like you with your position, stand just as firmly with ours. I'm pleased to know there are still those who have the same views as I about this matter. This pleases me. I want to believe that the lawmakers we elect into office who approve important decisions stick to the law and not bend it for the convenience of certain groups and their agenda. As a concerned citizen and a stakeholder, I am well within my rights to expect this.



The body is a beautiful creation. As a John Mayer song goes, your body is a wonderland. However, please don't display it lewdly and obscenely. That is all I ask. There's a place for that freedom any time and anywhere but not on Main Street.

I agree that laws should be stuck to 100 percent of the time (even if they're stupid laws). Maybe then enough enlightened people will get irritated with the sheer number of obnoxiously intrusive or religious dogma tainted laws and overturn most of them.



I do disagree with what you think constitutes lewd or obscene on this and how you characterize other peoples bodies and actions. We're probably not going to ever agree on this but that's fine if you can worry about what your body does and leave other peoples alone to do what's best for them. I find most parades offensive and it's not because of the clothes they're not wearing but the clothes they are wearing though I continue to look the other way albeit shaking my head and quietly cursing them for what I view as ignorance and pack mentality.