Forum Conversations

[Chip Atkins]

*her. I'm a woman. And I DD, on ignore because she has nothing of value to add to any discussion aside from her need to insert her anger at religion. She doesn't listen and is exceptionally nasty and psycho level aggresive. I'd simply rather swallow shards of glass than attempt a meaningful dialog with her.  It doesn't matter, though, what you tell her....because in her mind she already knows everything about you and your motives. She is best, ignored.

Sorry Dove, I thought both of you were men. She might be best ignored, but her constant flaming, trolling and loony assumptions are the reason I registered.

[Anonymous]

*her. I'm a woman. And I DD, on ignore because she has nothing of value to add to any discussion aside from her need to insert her anger at religion. She doesn't listen and is exceptionally nasty and psycho level aggresive. I'd simply rather swallow shards of glass than attempt a meaningful dialog with her.  It doesn't matter, though, what you tell her....because in her mind she already knows everything about you and your motives. She is best, ignored.

Sorry Dove, I thought both of you were men. She might be best ignored, but her constant flaming, trolling and loony assumptions are the reason I registered.

Well, have at it lol. I'm from the troll/flame community, though. She's probably the typical alcoholic with personal axes to grind that have nothing to do with any posters on the net...so she's ripe for the trolling. Be ready for the textual walls of vomit and inbox death threats though. ; )

[Bricktop]

You got a death threat?



No fair.



Where's mine???

[RW]

Ignore is for the weak.

[Anonymous]

Or for those who are so sick of flaming they could puke. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Ignore is for the weak.

Or for adults..



Trolling and flaming are for insecure children..



But that is only my humble opinion.

[Bricktop]

[RW]

Hahaha

[Bricktop]

Thus, I started a flame thread...



It works this way; if you don't mind flaming someone, and can take a bit of heat, go in there and knock yourself out. If you don't like flaming, don't go in there, and you'll never have to worry.



The clue is in the title. See if you can spot it.

[RW]

Go and spank Spec like I did.

[Anonymous]

Thus, I started a flame thread...



It works this way; if you don't mind flaming someone, and can take a bit of heat, go in there and knock yourself out. If you don't like flaming, don't go in there, and you'll never have to worry.



The clue is in the title. See if you can spot it.

I understand SPECTRE, so now that I added my two cents, I will stay out of flame threads..



But, it seems most are flame threads now.

 ac_umm

[Bricktop]

See you in the Flame thread then.... ac_razz

[asal]

Wouldn't putting someone on the Foe list be the same as Christians or Muslims in the last two millenniums insisting on unilateral compliance with their ideologies at risk of a sword run through them?



Being put on the Foe list in that case would be a badge of honor for anyone with personal conviction that they won't allow to be vilified or suppressed.

I put people on the foe list who I'm tired of reading.  I could skip over their posts, but I prefer to list them as foes (just one (1) on this forum) because it's easier to skip over them.  My eyes LOVE to read  ac_smile

[Frood]

*her. I'm a woman. And I DD, on ignore because she has nothing of value to add to any discussion aside from her need to insert her anger at religion. She doesn't listen and is exceptionally nasty and psycho level aggresive. I'd simply rather swallow shards of glass than attempt a meaningful dialog with her.  It doesn't matter, though, what you tell her....because in her mind she already knows everything about you and your motives. She is best, ignored.

Dove here is under a number of false impressions. I for one have no anger at religions which know their place (a personal conviction which shouldn't be used to quash other peoples personal convictions). That's why she views my contributions thus far as nasty or psycho level aggressive (because she places her spiritual beliefs on how others should live and is incapable of being told "no, fuck off, that's personal not communal, seriously, fuck off, where do you get off? Oh nevermind, you're an idiot").



Someone who tells another person that they can't follow their own path because it's against theirs? That's a hypocrite and self centered mental basket case.



NOBODY told Dove to not do Cocaine, Heroin, or wrap her fat thighs around a metal pole so desperate men could stuff bills down her yeasty panties. In fact, it was part of her path towards her religiosity. Do I care one way or another? No, I don't. It worked for Dove then, Christianity works for her now, and maybe she'll ascend to some better way before she dies, like Atheism or Buddhism.



Am I going to let her phases and opinions dictate how I chose to live my life? Fuck no. Will I respect her decisions on a personal level? Sure. I'm even prepared to continue to tolerate her religious behavior on public grounds assuming she can do the same for those who are opposed to it. My main point in all of this skullduggery has been to highlight a great discrepancy and double standard in communal life.  



You can be unduly delayed by a motorcade of religious mourners or wedding celebrants. You can have your grocery store and merchant shops publicly shut down because of a religious event. This happens every week and through the year. All in all, people are pretty tolerant of it, even those like me who believe it's stupid. We simply avoid travel near certain areas and stock up close to holidays.



Dove however can't avoid travel away from a 1-3 hour long LGBT Pride March ONCE per year where an extremely small percent of public exhibitionists might decide to make a spiritual or philosophical statement about nudity! (She might happen upon it even if it's generally conducted in a CBD far away from any typical suburb AND advertised well in advance. She might even drag her children along for it, school aged or not during daylight hours, and she might be offended.)



Truth be known, her children wouldn't care one bit nor should she.



For someone who took her top off for money and grinded on metal poles in order to fuel her drug addiction, she's got no validity when she applies her current religious mindset against a small group of people who in all probability don't have anything sordid like her past mentality.



That's what religion has done to Dove's brain (or more succinctly, that's how Dove's brain has hurt the spiritual integrity of what she's pushing)

[RW]

I'm okay with the use of religion as a means of betterment in life even if it is trading one addiction for another.



I agree with you on many point Di, especially about pride parades.