Study Result: Physically weak men tend to be socialists

[Anonymous]

You're becoming a bore Ms. Iron.  A serious fucking snoozer as is your pet rig pig.

Ahhh, I'm sorry you feel that way. Perhaps I could offer to pay for Blurt's Caitlyn Jenner transformation. ac_toofunny  ac_lmfao

It's the least you could do.



 

I agree. Take the burden off of the taxpayer. Besides, I have empathy for lazy old men suffering from Peter Pan syndrome.



Fuck, I'm wonderful.

[Anonymous]

You're becoming a bore Ms. Iron.  A serious fucking snoozer as is your pet rig pig.

Ahhh, I'm sorry you feel that way. Perhaps I could offer to pay for Blurt's Caitlyn Jenner transformation. ac_toofunny  ac_lmfao

It's the least you could do.



 

I agree. Take the burden off of the taxpayer. Besides, I have empathy for lazy old men suffering from Peter Pan syndrome.



Fuck, I'm wonderful.

 :001_rolleyes:

[Thiel]

Physically weak men tend to be socialists



by Red Square http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/av ... e_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif[/img]



Least surprising academic study of 2017



An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.



Now, I'm not exactly built like Arnold - I only occasionally visit the gym - but I can't fit into a modern hipster jacket.



Back when I lived in New York - it was 2011, a few months before I moved to Florida - I went shopping for a modern-looking microfiber jacket suitable for cool weather. I visited a dozen boutique stores in Manhattan, trying on a variety of nice-looking jackets. None of them fit me in the chest. Even if I was able to zip them up over my chest, I couldn't move my arms. And those that fit my chest were made for a much taller guy. But if I were that tall, the jacket probably wouldn't fit around my chest either. Eventually I gave up my search, and I'm still wearing my old jacket I bought at Costco ten years ago for $30.



That experience made me wonder if the jacket designers and manufacturers know something about their customers that I don't. That there has been a change in the human species and I didn't get the memo. That the newly bred males of homo sapiens (at least those in big cities like New York) are supposed to be uniformly weak in the upper body, with tiny concave chests and narrow shoulders, and the exceptions like me are so few that it is no longer economically feasible to make jackets with more room around the shoulders.



This anecdote confirms the above study - if your upper body mass exceeds the limitations of a hipster jacket, you are destined to wear a business suit with lots of room for your chest and shoulders.



It is a fact that most New Yorkers lean towards socialism, and their current fearless leader Mayor de Blasio may as well call himself a communist. De Blasio himself is a big guy physically, which makes sense - he is a leader of the puny-chested masses, not a follower. Socialism does divide people into leaders (business suits) and followers (hipster jackets), which also matches the body type.



One of the questions in the study was, "Are men who are naturally strong more inclined to hold capitalistic views, or are men with capitalistic views driven to go to the gym?"



What I wonder is, do fashion designers simply react to the increase in the puny-chested socialist-leaning demographic - or have they created an ideal puny-chested look that young people in big cities aspire to match?



Are those in charge of fundamentally transforming America purposefully using fashion design to create sluggish herds of anemic, sickly followers who would vote for socialist policies?



I'm sure this conspiracy theory is worthy of its own discussion thread.



http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/physically-weak-men-tend-to-be-socialists-t19475.html">The People's Cube

I am not exactly buff, but I am about as far from a socialist as a person can get while staying remaining visible on the political spectrum.

[Anonymous]

Physically weak men tend to be socialists



by Red Square http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/av ... e_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif[/img]



Least surprising academic study of 2017



An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.



Now, I'm not exactly built like Arnold - I only occasionally visit the gym - but I can't fit into a modern hipster jacket.



Back when I lived in New York - it was 2011, a few months before I moved to Florida - I went shopping for a modern-looking microfiber jacket suitable for cool weather. I visited a dozen boutique stores in Manhattan, trying on a variety of nice-looking jackets. None of them fit me in the chest. Even if I was able to zip them up over my chest, I couldn't move my arms. And those that fit my chest were made for a much taller guy. But if I were that tall, the jacket probably wouldn't fit around my chest either. Eventually I gave up my search, and I'm still wearing my old jacket I bought at Costco ten years ago for $30.



That experience made me wonder if the jacket designers and manufacturers know something about their customers that I don't. That there has been a change in the human species and I didn't get the memo. That the newly bred males of homo sapiens (at least those in big cities like New York) are supposed to be uniformly weak in the upper body, with tiny concave chests and narrow shoulders, and the exceptions like me are so few that it is no longer economically feasible to make jackets with more room around the shoulders.



This anecdote confirms the above study - if your upper body mass exceeds the limitations of a hipster jacket, you are destined to wear a business suit with lots of room for your chest and shoulders.



It is a fact that most New Yorkers lean towards socialism, and their current fearless leader Mayor de Blasio may as well call himself a communist. De Blasio himself is a big guy physically, which makes sense - he is a leader of the puny-chested masses, not a follower. Socialism does divide people into leaders (business suits) and followers (hipster jackets), which also matches the body type.



One of the questions in the study was, "Are men who are naturally strong more inclined to hold capitalistic views, or are men with capitalistic views driven to go to the gym?"



What I wonder is, do fashion designers simply react to the increase in the puny-chested socialist-leaning demographic - or have they created an ideal puny-chested look that young people in big cities aspire to match?



Are those in charge of fundamentally transforming America purposefully using fashion design to create sluggish herds of anemic, sickly followers who would vote for socialist policies?



I'm sure this conspiracy theory is worthy of its own discussion thread.



http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/physically-weak-men-tend-to-be-socialists-t19475.html">The People's Cube

I am not exactly buff, but I am about as far from a socialist as a person can get while staying remaining visible on the political spectrum.

I never thought of you as fitting any particular stereotype..



Whatever your politics are, I wish we could see you more often Thiel.

 ac_smile

[Thiel]

Physically weak men tend to be socialists



by Red Square http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/av ... e_Hand.gif">http://tpc.pc2.netdna-cdn.com/images/avatars/Cube_Hand.gif[/img]



Least surprising academic study of 2017



An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men.



Now, I'm not exactly built like Arnold - I only occasionally visit the gym - but I can't fit into a modern hipster jacket.



Back when I lived in New York - it was 2011, a few months before I moved to Florida - I went shopping for a modern-looking microfiber jacket suitable for cool weather. I visited a dozen boutique stores in Manhattan, trying on a variety of nice-looking jackets. None of them fit me in the chest. Even if I was able to zip them up over my chest, I couldn't move my arms. And those that fit my chest were made for a much taller guy. But if I were that tall, the jacket probably wouldn't fit around my chest either. Eventually I gave up my search, and I'm still wearing my old jacket I bought at Costco ten years ago for $30.



That experience made me wonder if the jacket designers and manufacturers know something about their customers that I don't. That there has been a change in the human species and I didn't get the memo. That the newly bred males of homo sapiens (at least those in big cities like New York) are supposed to be uniformly weak in the upper body, with tiny concave chests and narrow shoulders, and the exceptions like me are so few that it is no longer economically feasible to make jackets with more room around the shoulders.



This anecdote confirms the above study - if your upper body mass exceeds the limitations of a hipster jacket, you are destined to wear a business suit with lots of room for your chest and shoulders.



It is a fact that most New Yorkers lean towards socialism, and their current fearless leader Mayor de Blasio may as well call himself a communist. De Blasio himself is a big guy physically, which makes sense - he is a leader of the puny-chested masses, not a follower. Socialism does divide people into leaders (business suits) and followers (hipster jackets), which also matches the body type.



One of the questions in the study was, "Are men who are naturally strong more inclined to hold capitalistic views, or are men with capitalistic views driven to go to the gym?"



What I wonder is, do fashion designers simply react to the increase in the puny-chested socialist-leaning demographic - or have they created an ideal puny-chested look that young people in big cities aspire to match?



Are those in charge of fundamentally transforming America purposefully using fashion design to create sluggish herds of anemic, sickly followers who would vote for socialist policies?



I'm sure this conspiracy theory is worthy of its own discussion thread.



http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/physically-weak-men-tend-to-be-socialists-t19475.html">The People's Cube

I am not exactly buff, but I am about as far from a socialist as a person can get while staying remaining visible on the political spectrum.

I never thought of you as fitting any particular stereotype..



Whatever your politics are, I wish we could see you more often Thiel.

 ac_smile

I have never fit into any box or in this case, a cube.



I wish I could drop in more often too. It's a fun little group you have here. But, running a business leaves me with a limited amount of free time.

[Bricktop]

Well, shut the damn business down.



Where's your priorities, man???

[Bricktop]

Stupid double post!

[Thiel]

Well, shut the damn business down.



Where's your priorities, man???

Well, if governments across Canada enact legislation like Ontario did, I will be out of business.

[Blurt]

How so?



(And thanks, Shen, for the offer to pay for my surgeries--total is $23,600. I'll PM you my bank info.)

[Anonymous]

How so?



(And thanks, Shen, for the offer to pay for my surgeries--total is $23,600. I'll PM you my bank info.)

Are you really this fucking ignorant? A business owner can be short staffed 10  days a year(all of which will be the beginning or end of a weekend)  and two of which are paid drunk weekends. That legislation in will not stand.  It will be amended even if the Grits miraculously win.



Yes, I will pay for your unnecessary operation. I want full value for my money though and it must guarantee that you stop being a parasitical cocksucker. Therefore, no anessthetic and only rusty instruments. Cut it off at the waist.

[Blurt]

Sorry to disappoint you but I'm post-op now.



Rusty instruments were extra.



I saved you close to a grand.



Now pay up.

[Anonymous]

Sorry to disappoint you but I'm post-op now.



Rusty instruments were extra.



I saved you close to a grand.



Now pay up.

Unfortunately, you're still alive. That offer was for society, not for you.

[Blurt]

Damn.



You drive a hard bargain.