White Genocide

[Aryan]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Listen SCOUSE, the childish name calling shit is one thing but she's no pseudo-intellectual.  She's bested you in every debate point so far.  I mean it's not hard, but I doubt anyone here is going to recommend you to MENSA.

Bested me?  Listen you silly cow, she has totally ignored the Kalergi Plan, along with the very real fact that white people are being overrun by muslims here in the UK and claims Cultural Marxism is a conspiracy theory.....  ac_toofunny



Have you bothered to check out this thread yet?  



http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cultural-marxism-and-the-politics-idiocy-t7219.html">http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cu ... t7219.html">http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cultural-marxism-and-the-politics-idiocy-t7219.html

[Renee]

Renee, frankly, I don't believe anything snopes posts..

The last thing that "fact" checking site is, is objective.

What makes you say that?

I can give lots of examples, but read this article from Forbes.



https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#45a46d1c227f">https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleeta ... a46d1c227f">https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#45a46d1c227f

Here's an example of their fact checking objectivity.



When Ben Carson, now secretary of Housing and Urban Development, was speaking recently before his HUD staff, he compared slaves to immigrants and the entire Democratic Party imploded:



"That's what America is about. A land of dreams and opportunity. There were other immigrants who came here in the bottom of slave ships, worked even longer, even harder for less. But they, too, had a dream that one day their sons, daughters, grandsons, granddaughters, great-grandsons, great-granddaughters might pursue prosperity and happiness in this land."



Liberals everywhere jumped on Carson as if he had given a Nazi salute. Whoopi Goldberg was highly offended by Carson's comparison and said on The View, "Were the slaves really thinking about the American dream? No, because they were thinking, 'What the hell just happened?!'" Samuel L. Jackson said in typical fashion, "MUTHAFUKKA PLEASE!!!" and slandered carson as a "#dickheadedtom." The NAACP was flabbergasted and posted to Twitter, "Immigrants???"



But where was all this selective outrage when President Obama said the same thing in 2012 and 2015? He, too, said slaves were immigrants. Yet, no one cared, because it was Obama.



Or, how about John F. Kennedy — certainly a favorite name to invoke for Democrats — when he wrote about immigrant slaves coming to America. No outrage their, either.



So, did Snopes bother to cite any of these comments in its take, "Did Ben Carson Liken Slavery to Immigration?" No, they did not. They were too busy "helping" Dr. Carson learn what a real "immigrant" is rather than dig up these other examples.



Looks like the fact checkers need fact checkers.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/staceydash/2017/03/cant-trust-snopes-anymore/">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/staceydash ... s-anymore/">http://www.patheos.com/blogs/staceydash/2017/03/cant-trust-snopes-anymore/

Really? Stacy Dash....a celebutard turned political acitivist.



Democrat yesterday....Republican today......Who knows what tomorrow.... ac_lmfao

Was what she wrote wrong?



Okay, well how about this. Snopes that this image does not show a Bernie rally from May 2016. However, video from the event shows that it was, in fact, taken from that event. Snopes never explained why they thought it was taken from a previous rally. They just insisted it did.

http://www.snopes.com/27000-people-came-to-a-bernie-sanders-rally-in-california/">http://www.snopes.com/27000-people-came ... alifornia/">http://www.snopes.com/27000-people-came-to-a-bernie-sanders-rally-in-california/



Snopes has always leaned to the prog side, but they gave up any appearance of objectivity around the time the owners of the site filed for divorce.

I wouldn't say prog...but I would say somewhat liberal. That doesn't change the fact that Stacy Dash is a politically schizoid, air head....A band wagon jumper, desperate for relevancy.



In reality, Snopes still leans more toward objectivity than any blatant politically partisan organization. As of yet Snopes hasn't officially declared a political leaning or affiliation. Their fact checking is still considered valid by most media outlets with exception of those on the extreme ends of the political spectrum. To those extremist types of organizations only their narrative is the truth.

[Renee]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Again this is where you fall on your face. It's a trend that everyone but you can see...



I never said that that other political organizations don't have the capacity to be racist. I said that some political organizations like the KKK founded their core principles on racism and that they openly practice it. Anyone that would deny that organizations like Klan or the American Nazi party practice racism....is an idiot.



You are waaaaay out of your league here little boy.

[Aryan]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Again this is where you fall on your face. It's a trend that everyone but you can see...



I never said that that other political organizations don't have the capacity to be racist. I said that some political organizations like the KKK founded their core principles on racism and that they openly practice it.



You are waaaaay out of your league here little boy.

Nice deflection, but you have implied that ANTIFA are never racist and would not produce a poster like the one illustrated, while so called 'neo nazi' organisations should be held accountable straight away if a similar poster supposedly created by them surfaces.  

[Anonymous]

I wouldn't say prog...but I would say somewhat liberal. That doesn't change the fact that Stacy Dash is a politically schizoid, air head....A band wagon jumper, desperate for relevancy.



In reality, Snopes still leans more toward objectivity than any blatant politically partisan organization. As of yet Snopes hasn't officially declared a political leaning or affiliation. Their fact checking is still considered valid by most media outlets with exception of those on the extreme ends of the political spectrum. To those extremist types of organizations only their narrative is the truth.

They abandoned objectivity at least two years ago. If you read that article Fash posted, the owner doesn't deny someone on his staff sought political office. Isn't that special.



Here's another example of how they decide what is true and what is false. It's about "missing" 6 billion dollars under Secretary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. The claim is rejected as "Mostly False" because the author believes that "unaccounted for" does not equate as "missing" in government organizations. That is one huge logical proposition and is never explained in the article why unaccountable funds should not count as missing. If your child went "unaccounted for" would you be worried? Or would you say it's not a big deal because they are technically not missing? The answer should be quite clear.

[Renee]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Again this is where you fall on your face. It's a trend that everyone but you can see...



I never said that that other political organizations don't have the capacity to be racist. I said that some political organizations like the KKK founded their core principles on racism and that they openly practice it.



You are waaaaay out of your league here little boy.

Nice deflection, but you have implied that ANTIFA are never racist and would not produce a poster like the one illustrated, while so called 'neo nazi' organisations should be held accountable straight away if a similar poster supposedly created by them surfaces.  

Show me where I said that.



 Show me where I said that the ECA is innocent of racism. All I posted was that "they" deny responsibility for the posters. There was no endorsement of guilt or non guilt on my part.



As for who should be held accountable, that remains to be scene. Get the picture junior? Or does that clash with the white supremacist narrative that you have been spouting.



We all know truth and objectivity is not your strong suit but this last accusation was pretty lame

[Aryan]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Again this is where you fall on your face. It's a trend that everyone but you can see...



I never said that that other political organizations don't have the capacity to be racist. I said that some political organizations like the KKK founded their core principles on racism and that they openly practice it.



You are waaaaay out of your league here little boy.

Nice deflection, but you have implied that ANTIFA are never racist and would not produce a poster like the one illustrated, while so called 'neo nazi' organisations should be held accountable straight away if a similar poster supposedly created by them surfaces.  

Show me where I said that.



 Show me where I said that the ECA is innocent of racism. All I posted was that "they" deny responsibility for the posters. There was no endorsement of guilt or non guilt on my part.



As for who should be held accountable, that remains to be scene. Get the picture junior? Or does that clash with the white supremacist narrative that you have been spouting.



We all know truth and objectivity is not your strong suit but this last accusation was pretty lame

Are you really this  stupid? Go back and read what you wrote, you posted an article from a very dubious, unreliable left wing source claiming that the poster was fake and you presented this as fact, while saying afterwards  that groups like the KKK are more likely to produce racist material.  

[Aryan]

Still no thoughts on Bricktop's thread about Cultural Marxism from the gruesome twosome.  ac_lmfao  



Very telling indeed..........

[Renee]

I wouldn't say prog...but I would say somewhat liberal. That doesn't change the fact that Stacy Dash is a politically schizoid, air head....A band wagon jumper, desperate for relevancy.



In reality, Snopes still leans more toward objectivity than any blatant politically partisan organization. As of yet Snopes hasn't officially declared a political leaning or affiliation. Their fact checking is still considered valid by most media outlets with exception of those on the extreme ends of the political spectrum. To those extremist types of organizations only their narrative is the truth.

They abandoned objectivity at least two years ago. If you read that article Fash posted, the owner doesn't deny someone on his staff sought political office. Isn't that special.



Here's another example of how they decide what is true and what is false. It's about "missing" 6 billion dollars under Secretary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. The claim is rejected as "Mostly False" because the author believes that "unaccounted for" does not equate as "missing" in government organizations. That is one huge logical proposition and is never explained in the article why unaccountable funds should not count as missing. If your child went "unaccounted for" would you be worried? Or would you say it's not a big deal because they are technically not missing? The answer should be quite clear.

Okay, let's stop the hysterics, it's insulting. Missing children and "unaccounted for" government money are not even remotely related.



Now, unaccounted for government money doesn't necessarily mean the money is missing. Usually when the US gov says that money is "unaccounted for" it means that it is not tracked properly. Money exchanged between departments is not always up to expected accounting standards in most cases documentation of the transactions exist it just not record up to auditing standards.



I read somewhere that in 2001 the DOD alone had 2.3 trillion in transactions "unaccounted" for or unsupported. Many of the transactions included, manually recorded contract amounts and pension actuarial liabilities. They eventually were accounted for but we'll into the 2002 fiscal year.



Now I know that's no excuse and it's sloppy but to be honest, a lot of people labor under the concept that the US government keeps track of money like private industry does. That's not the case. The financial recording systems and methods across the multitude of departments is outdated and antiquated. Plus government employees don't work with any sense of urgency so much of their budgetary accountability lags well behind the transactions. That does not mean the money is missing.

[RW]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Listen SCOUSE, the childish name calling shit is one thing but she's no pseudo-intellectual.  She's bested you in every debate point so far.  I mean it's not hard, but I doubt anyone here is going to recommend you to MENSA.

Bested me?  Listen you silly cow, she has totally ignored the Kalergi Plan, along with the very real fact that white people are being overrun by muslims here in the UK and claims Cultural Marxism is a conspiracy theory.....  ac_toofunny



Have you bothered to check out this thread yet?  



http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cultural-marxism-and-the-politics-idiocy-t7219.html">http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cu ... t7219.html">http://thebluecashew.net/politics-f7/cultural-marxism-and-the-politics-idiocy-t7219.html

No I haven't bothered to check out that thread.

[Renee]

I would believe it because that's what they do and they don't apologize for it or try to hide it. In fact those two organizations would probably fall all over themselves claiming responsibility for such vile shit.

You're a pseudo intellectual who likes to pretend you're an expert on everything when in fact you are fucking clueless.



Your post here, along with countless others illustrates this completely.....



The very fact that you openly admit to believing that certain organisations on the political spectrum can be openly racist while others can't is fucking idiotic.

Again this is where you fall on your face. It's a trend that everyone but you can see...



I never said that that other political organizations don't have the capacity to be racist. I said that some political organizations like the KKK founded their core principles on racism and that they openly practice it.



You are waaaaay out of your league here little boy.

Nice deflection, but you have implied that ANTIFA are never racist and would not produce a poster like the one illustrated, while so called 'neo nazi' organisations should be held accountable straight away if a similar poster supposedly created by them surfaces.  

Show me where I said that.



 Show me where I said that the ECA is innocent of racism. All I posted was that "they" deny responsibility for the posters. There was no endorsement of guilt or non guilt on my part.



As for who should be held accountable, that remains to be scene. Get the picture junior? Or does that clash with the white supremacist narrative that you have been spouting.



We all know truth and objectivity is not your strong suit but this last accusation was pretty lame

Are you really this  stupid? Go back and read what you wrote, you posted an article from a very dubious, unreliable left wing source claiming that the poster was fake and you presented this as fact, while saying afterwards  that groups like the KKK are more likely to produce racist material.  

You really are an idiot.



In terms of what I posted regarding the ECA...I posted their account of the issue....again I endorsed nothing.



I guess examining both sides of an issue for discussion, is something morons like you don't like.... much like science and fact.....I guess you might be afraid it could shed some doubt onto your racial hysterics.



As for claiming the KKK or the Neo Nazi movement is racist, yeah, I stand by that premise as do the organizations themselves. But those said organizations try to hide there racism by sugar coating their vile racial stance in the form of "white pride"....



As stated previously...anyone denying this is an idiot...or a liar...which one are you or are you both?



"White Pride" includes the promotion of one race over another along with the vilification of certain so called non white races....that's racism as defined by every dictionary on the fucking planet.

[RW]

I wouldn't say prog...but I would say somewhat liberal. That doesn't change the fact that Stacy Dash is a politically schizoid, air head....A band wagon jumper, desperate for relevancy.



In reality, Snopes still leans more toward objectivity than any blatant politically partisan organization. As of yet Snopes hasn't officially declared a political leaning or affiliation. Their fact checking is still considered valid by most media outlets with exception of those on the extreme ends of the political spectrum. To those extremist types of organizations only their narrative is the truth.

They abandoned objectivity at least two years ago. If you read that article Fash posted, the owner doesn't deny someone on his staff sought political office. Isn't that special.



Here's another example of how they decide what is true and what is false. It's about "missing" 6 billion dollars under Secretary Clinton's tenure as Secretary of State. The claim is rejected as "Mostly False" because the author believes that "unaccounted for" does not equate as "missing" in government organizations. That is one huge logical proposition and is never explained in the article why unaccountable funds should not count as missing. If your child went "unaccounted for" would you be worried? Or would you say it's not a big deal because they are technically not missing? The answer should be quite clear.

More than one staff person works on an article so even if one or two had a particular lean, the other three who work a piece may not.



Your other point is nitpicking word choice.  Missing = Unaccounted for.

[RW]

Are you really this  stupid? Go back and read what you wrote, you posted an article from a very dubious, unreliable left wing source claiming that the poster was fake and you presented this as fact, while saying afterwards  that groups like the KKK are more likely to produce racist material.  

Renee, do you know what article he means?

[Renee]

Are you really this  stupid? Go back and read what you wrote, you posted an article from a very dubious, unreliable left wing source claiming that the poster was fake and you presented this as fact, while saying afterwards  that groups like the KKK are more likely to produce racist material.  

Renee, do you know what article he means?

Yeah he is crying about the fact that I posted a Snopes article regarding inflammatory posters being put up in Seattle warning non whites not to date white people. SCOUSE apparently is dead sure that it's the work of Emerald City Antifa.



He must have come across that bit of info in his crystal ball that he got with his White Supremacy for Dummy's beginners kit.



It's a couple pages back and Snopes took no stance on who was responsible for the posters. All they said is that it was unclear.



Apparently our Neo Nazi knot head thinks that by posting  the Snopes article I am defending the Antifa movement.



It's another lame attempt by that asshole to try and defend his white victim status.....

[RW]

Ahhhh okay.  I couldn't figure out wtf he's on about but it seems he can't either.