Quote from: "realgrimm"Quote from: "RW"Quote from: "Fashionista"Quote from: "RW"Quote from: "Wazzzup"Quote from: "Fashionista"I don't agree with the KKK or neonazis. That is your strawman argument, I just believe they have a right to free speech. I also happen to think the black panthers and nation of islam should also have free speech. They are leftists hate groups. But I want them to have that right.Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I agree entirely with this Wazzzup..
As long as both sides are peaceful, particularly when they meet on public property.
Amen to that, everyone should have the right of free political speech, as long as they do so nonviolently
So it's okay to slander/defame people?It's okay to utter threats?(Just words right?) It's okay to conspire to commit non-violent crime?
That wouldn't be peaceful.
He just said "non-violently". Utter threats isn't violent nor does the threat have to be violent.
ya uttering threats are considered assault in the penal code so that would be violent...nice try snowflake
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/VM8JjtBaTcg4oRvQK4-jGpGv-fYkgs6vD6WSnZD47TrUje9WOtapBdPeztfueEtrDHgXSE0PtuaCUZJdWCXxcP6bBItQRx70u4IatRKwGsjsNf9TCpQw57AqoX0Lw1ORlNUjYPNQ">
Uttering threats is NOT assault under your country's penal code and mine. In Canada, uttering threats is considered to be an "offence against the person", which makes it the same as assault in terms of its class, but not an assault itself.
In your country, uttering threats is covered by coercion statutes.
If you are going to try to show me up, try being correct.