News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

The best topic

*

Replies: 12082
Total votes: : 6

Last post: Today at 07:46:08 AM
Re: Forum gossip thread by DKG

Shen Li and Fash have you ever heard of "baizuo"?

Started by Wazzzup, September 27, 2017, 12:33:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Window Lickers are viewing this topic.

Wazzzup

Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Shen Li"
Quote from: "SCOUSE"
Quote from: "Shen Li"White lefties make me fucking puke. Most whites are libtard scumbags too.


That's actually not true, it's just that libturds are the most vocal. Many whites with similar views to me are too scared of voicing their opinions due to the likely possibility of being vilified and denounced as being racist.

Horseshit. Face it, you whites are mostly libtards.


In the US most whites are conservative, especially white men and married white women.

Conservatives can still be liberal with issues  like immigration. Likewise, leftists can right wing when it comes to that issue. SCOUSE and IHJ are hardly fiscal conservatives.


Sure, there's all kinds of people out there, many, maybe even most, take positions from either side.  I'm okay with abortion for first and second trimesters, I'm okay with gay marriage, and I think some gun control is reasonable.



The thing is can you be in favor of high immigration and still be fiscally conservative?  In the US illegals cost taxpayers money, they are a burden. Also over half of legal US immigrants are on some sort of welfare. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... /71517072/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/



Likewise Muslim immigrants cost European and Canadian taxpayers more money, many are on welfare, many have to be watched by police because they are potentially dangerous, and even those who aren't into terrorism are more likely then the general population to commit other crimes further burdening taxpayers.



Immigration should be about benfitting a country not just the people coming to it.  Those who make a country worse should be refused.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"


The thing is can you be in favor of high immigration and still be fiscally conservative?  In the US illegals cost taxpayers money, they are a burden. Also over half of legal US immigrants are on some sort of welfare. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nat ... /71517072/">https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/09/01/immigrant-welfare-use-report/71517072/



Likewise Muslim immigrants cost European and Canadian taxpayers more money, many are on welfare, many have to be watched by police because they are potentially dangerous, and even those who aren't into terrorism are more likely then the general population to commit other crimes further burdening taxpayers.



Immigration should be about benfitting a country not just the people coming to it.  Those who make a country worse should be refused.

I agree that immigration must be about what the immigrant can do for the host country and not vice versa.



I am talking about legal immigrants who are better educated than Canadians. The US ag sector is dependent on illegal immigration, but that's another story.

RW

Quote from: "Wazzzup"[

Likewise Muslim immigrants cost European and Canadian taxpayers more money, many are on welfare, many have to be watched by police because they are potentially dangerous, and even those who aren't into terrorism are more likely then the general population to commit other crimes further burdening taxpayers.

Do you have something to support the above claim?  I'd like to read it.



To start it off, the University of Alberta publication site Folio posted an article that challenged your assertion.


Quote"Despite their generosity to newcomers in general, many Canadians still see Muslim immigrants as a threat. And yet there is no evidence to suggest these immigrants are any more likely to radicalize—or even commit petty crime—than Canadian citizens already here, say two University of Alberta experts in immigration.



"When you think back to discussions about how many Syrian refugees we were going to take, there was a lot of focus on whether they would pose a security threat," said sociologist Sandra Bucerius, who also sits on the Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society. "That does not seem to have materialized whatsoever.



"Police officers are telling us the Syrian newcomer community is not posing any problems we would not see in any other community," she said, citing her own research on community policing in immigrant communities."



Bucerius said most Canadians are simply not aware of the extreme vetting for refugees already in place—first by the United Nations Refugee Agency and again by Canadian visa officers who look for inconsistencies in their stories. After extensive interviews, officers run biometric data such as fingerprints and iris scans through databases of the Canada Border Services Agency, Canadian Security Intelligence Service, RCMP and Interpol.



As a final check, border agents review documentation, and if they have any suspicions, can turn refugees away. Those who make it to Canada on their own—such as those now fleeing from the United States in light of President Donald Trump's travel ban—skip the United Nations process but must still clear all Canadian protocols before being scheduled for a hearing with the Immigration and Refugee Board.



One result of this extreme vetting is that refugees—as with most immigrants to Canada—commit less crime on average than those already here.



"You don't often get scholarly consensus, but on this we have it," said Bucerius. "The media unfortunately isn't getting it. We need to tell that story again and again."


http://www.folio.ca/immigration-misconception-driving-anti-muslim-sentiment-in-canada/">http://www.folio.ca/immigration-misconc ... in-canada/">http://www.folio.ca/immigration-misconception-driving-anti-muslim-sentiment-in-canada/
Beware of Gaslighters!

Wazzzup

I ran across this video.  Looks like the Chinese have a good understanding of what the white left is about



">

Wazzzup

A great description of the modern left

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-lib ... d-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China


QuoteThe Urban Dictionary defines baizuo as:



"Baizuo (pronounced "bye-tswaw) is a Chinese epithet meaning naive western educated person who advocates for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority. A baizuo only cares about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment while being obsessed with political correctness to the extent that they import backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism."



The Urban Dictionary goes on to clarify that a stereotypical baizuo is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. :laugh3:  So to be recognized as a 'total baizuo' you should hold similar political sentiments as Trudeau does.



Chinese culture tends to act in a more traditional manner and frowns upon individuals or groups demanding special privileges, just because they identify themselves as so-called victims. Even though, I'm not baizuo and a conservative, one of the biggest challenges to adapt to China when first arriving here was to learn that you can not play your 'victim card' to gain advantages here.



In the Chinese mind, everybody has some suffering, so why should certain people deserve unfair privileges over others? To promote harmony they suggest you stop looking at yourself as a victim and do whatever you can to become a productive member of society.



Hence, a baizuo faces many obstacles to gain greater acceptance in Chinese society. They base their philosophical mindset on a notion that they and anyone else they support are victims, so society must not only welcome them with open arms but provide them with extra benefits that ordinary Chinese are not permitted to enjoy.



On the basis of fairness, the Chinese would find it difficult to condone the baizuo's requests for special treatment for members of the LGBT community, environmentalist activists and Islamist jihadists. They will wonder why do these certain types of people enjoy better career opportunities than a more qualified person does? Therefore, they view affirmative action hiring practices as counter-productive and could lead to disharmony for the community as a whole.



Of course, I do warn baizuo newcomers that their efforts may not succeed and they should at least consider the possibility of compromise when making demands. But, the over-zealous 'baizuo' can not comprehend such advice and usually tells me I'm acting intolerant and ignorant.



Well so be it and usually when my conversation comes to an end, I tell them, "it was nice knowing you," because so many 'baizuo' depart from China in disappointment a few months later, if they last that long.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"A great description of the modern left

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-lib ... d-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China


QuoteThe Urban Dictionary defines baizuo as:



"Baizuo (pronounced "bye-tswaw) is a Chinese epithet meaning naive western educated person who advocates for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority. A baizuo only cares about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment while being obsessed with political correctness to the extent that they import backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism."



The Urban Dictionary goes on to clarify that a stereotypical baizuo is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. :laugh3:  So to be recognized as a 'total baizuo' you should hold similar political sentiments as Trudeau does.



Chinese culture tends to act in a more traditional manner and frowns upon individuals or groups demanding special privileges, just because they identify themselves as so-called victims. Even though, I'm not baizuo and a conservative, one of the biggest challenges to adapt to China when first arriving here was to learn that you can not play your 'victim card' to gain advantages here.



In the Chinese mind, everybody has some suffering, so why should certain people deserve unfair privileges over others? To promote harmony they suggest you stop looking at yourself as a victim and do whatever you can to become a productive member of society.



Hence, a baizuo faces many obstacles to gain greater acceptance in Chinese society. They base their philosophical mindset on a notion that they and anyone else they support are victims, so society must not only welcome them with open arms but provide them with extra benefits that ordinary Chinese are not permitted to enjoy.



On the basis of fairness, the Chinese would find it difficult to condone the baizuo's requests for special treatment for members of the LGBT community, environmentalist activists and Islamist jihadists. They will wonder why do these certain types of people enjoy better career opportunities than a more qualified person does? Therefore, they view affirmative action hiring practices as counter-productive and could lead to disharmony for the community as a whole.



Of course, I do warn baizuo newcomers that their efforts may not succeed and they should at least consider the possibility of compromise when making demands. But, the over-zealous 'baizuo' can not comprehend such advice and usually tells me I'm acting intolerant and ignorant.



Well so be it and usually when my conversation comes to an end, I tell them, "it was nice knowing you," because so many 'baizuo' depart from China in disappointment a few months later, if they last that long.

Trudeau is definitely a bozo, I mean baizuo.

Rancidmilko

Over here the ones that represents them best are "caviar leftie" (rich people who don't live what the pray, communism for you, luxury for me) or "leftopath" (left + psychopath )
There\'s always a bigger fish.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"A great description of the modern left

https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-lib ... d-in-China">https://www.quora.com/Why-did-white-liberals%EF%BC%88%E7%99%BD%E5%B7%A6%EF%BC%89become-so-hated-in-China


QuoteThe Urban Dictionary defines baizuo as:



"Baizuo (pronounced "bye-tswaw) is a Chinese epithet meaning naive western educated person who advocates for peace and equality only to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority. A baizuo only cares about topics such as immigration, minorities, LGBT and the environment while being obsessed with political correctness to the extent that they import backwards Islamic values for the sake of multiculturalism."



The Urban Dictionary goes on to clarify that a stereotypical baizuo is Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. :laugh3:  So to be recognized as a 'total baizuo' you should hold similar political sentiments as Trudeau does.



Chinese culture tends to act in a more traditional manner and frowns upon individuals or groups demanding special privileges, just because they identify themselves as so-called victims. Even though, I'm not baizuo and a conservative, one of the biggest challenges to adapt to China when first arriving here was to learn that you can not play your 'victim card' to gain advantages here.



In the Chinese mind, everybody has some suffering, so why should certain people deserve unfair privileges over others? To promote harmony they suggest you stop looking at yourself as a victim and do whatever you can to become a productive member of society.



Hence, a baizuo faces many obstacles to gain greater acceptance in Chinese society. They base their philosophical mindset on a notion that they and anyone else they support are victims, so society must not only welcome them with open arms but provide them with extra benefits that ordinary Chinese are not permitted to enjoy.



On the basis of fairness, the Chinese would find it difficult to condone the baizuo's requests for special treatment for members of the LGBT community, environmentalist activists and Islamist jihadists. They will wonder why do these certain types of people enjoy better career opportunities than a more qualified person does? Therefore, they view affirmative action hiring practices as counter-productive and could lead to disharmony for the community as a whole.



Of course, I do warn baizuo newcomers that their efforts may not succeed and they should at least consider the possibility of compromise when making demands. But, the over-zealous 'baizuo' can not comprehend such advice and usually tells me I'm acting intolerant and ignorant.



Well so be it and usually when my conversation comes to an end, I tell them, "it was nice knowing you," because so many 'baizuo' depart from China in disappointment a few months later, if they last that long.

Some of the politics in North America and Europe is very strange to Chinese and even Taiwanese who are more liberal.

Wazzzup

Quote from: "Red_brazilian_nut"Over here the ones that represents them best are "caviar leftie" (rich people who don't live what the pray, communism for you, luxury for me) or "leftopath" (left + psychopath )
That sounds very familiar.  they love diversity but live in neighborhoods where they won;t see minorities for weeks.  And they decry free market economics even though under the communistic/socialist systems they advocate, they would have nothing.



One of the best examples is Michael Moore who owns this beautiful 5 million dollar house and is one of the biggest advocates for communism. He has a networth of 50 million dollars.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/08/01/2B312E5000000578-0-image-a-87_1438995036780.jpg">



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer

Angry White Male


Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Red_brazilian_nut"Over here the ones that represents them best are "caviar leftie" (rich people who don't live what the pray, communism for you, luxury for me) or "leftopath" (left + psychopath )
That sounds very familiar.  they love diversity but live in neighborhoods where they won;t see minorities for weeks.  And they decry free market economics even though under the communistic/socialist systems they advocate, they would have nothing.



One of the best examples is Michael Moore who owns this beautiful 5 million dollar house and is one of the biggest advocates for communism. He has a networth of 50 million dollars.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/08/01/2B312E5000000578-0-image-a-87_1438995036780.jpg">



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer

He doesn't live like an austere communist.

 :laugh:

Anonymous

Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Red_brazilian_nut"Over here the ones that represents them best are "caviar leftie" (rich people who don't live what the pray, communism for you, luxury for me) or "leftopath" (left + psychopath )
That sounds very familiar.  they love diversity but live in neighborhoods where they won;t see minorities for weeks.  And they decry free market economics even though under the communistic/socialist systems they advocate, they would have nothing.



One of the best examples is Michael Moore who owns this beautiful 5 million dollar house and is one of the biggest advocates for communism. He has a networth of 50 million dollars.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/08/01/2B312E5000000578-0-image-a-87_1438995036780.jpg">



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer

How can anyone take this fat piece of shit seriously.

Anonymous

Quote from: "Herman"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Red_brazilian_nut"Over here the ones that represents them best are "caviar leftie" (rich people who don't live what the pray, communism for you, luxury for me) or "leftopath" (left + psychopath )
That sounds very familiar.  they love diversity but live in neighborhoods where they won;t see minorities for weeks.  And they decry free market economics even though under the communistic/socialist systems they advocate, they would have nothing.



One of the best examples is Michael Moore who owns this beautiful 5 million dollar house and is one of the biggest advocates for communism. He has a networth of 50 million dollars.



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/08/08/01/2B312E5000000578-0-image-a-87_1438995036780.jpg">



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992824991883366400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992821961217716224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer



https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/9928 ... DCExaminer">https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/992819288212951040?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonexaminer.com%2Fnews%2Fmichael-moore-karl-marx-was-mostly-right&tfw_creator=PeteKDCNews&tfw_site=DCExaminer

How can anyone take this fat piece of shit seriously.

He's so phony, I wonder how he can look at himself in the mirror.

Angry White Male

I'm sure his income makes that easier to do...

Frood

Quote from: "Shen Li"White lefties make me fucking puke. Most whites are libtard scumbags too.


Most Asians give off the odor of sushi left out in the sun and they wear their sandals or flip flops with socks.  ac_hithere
Blahhhhhh...