Is the Seoul Brother a Progtard?

[Anonymous]

"Whatever the case" = "You are correct, Ace!"

Are you so insecure you need affirmation.

[Aryan]

He's a liberal leftie when it comes to immigration. He'd fit right in with the unwashed 'refugees welcome' brigade.

[Aryan]

Well, you cannot be a capitalist and a socialist in the same body.

Scouse is a a commie nationalist. Seoul is an ultra free enterprise globalist.

What?  ac_unsure

[Anonymous]

Well, you cannot be a capitalist and a socialist in the same body.

Scouse is a a commie nationalist. Seoul is an ultra free enterprise globalist.

What?  ac_unsure

You are hard left when it comes to economic issues. Actually, I take that back. You don't know fuck all about bread and butter matters.

[Bricktop]

Well, you cannot be a capitalist and a socialist in the same body.

Scouse is a a commie nationalist. Seoul is an ultra free enterprise globalist.

What?  ac_unsure

Dude, if you're a "national socialist", you are a communist. What part of "socialist" do you not comprehend?

[Aryan]

Well, you cannot be a capitalist and a socialist in the same body.

Scouse is a a commie nationalist. Seoul is an ultra free enterprise globalist.

What?  ac_unsure

Dude, if you're a "national socialist", you are a communist. What part of "socialist" do you not comprehend?

Communism and National Socialism are exact polar opposites.  :2r4ml1j_th:

[Anonymous]

Well, you cannot be a capitalist and a socialist in the same body.

Scouse is a a commie nationalist. Seoul is an ultra free enterprise globalist.

What?  ac_unsure

Dude, if you're a "national socialist", you are a communist. What part of "socialist" do you not comprehend?

Communism and National Socialism are exact polar opposites.  :2r4ml1j_th:

They are nearly identical fool.

[Bricktop]

Communism and National Socialism are exact polar opposites.

No, they are not. They are distinguished by a single factor; communism is based on changing the entire world to a socialist paradise. National Socialism is based on the same economic model and government dictatorship but on the basis of a single nation or race. Economically they are based on the same principles.



Communism was never intended by its architect to be implemented in Russia. Marx's intent was to create communism in Germany, because of its highly advanced industrial base and opportunity for workers to be fully employed. Russia was a backward, primitive rural based economy with little industry for worker's to be engaged in. Hitler was well aware that socialism in Germany was the way forward, and to be fair, the country prospered. But the workers were utterly separated from governance.



The Marxist centrally controlled and planned economic model was adopted by Hitler, to much better effect than it was by Lenin, who was hampered by a country far behind the modern world.

[Berry Sweet]

What a with all the labelling these days?

[Bricktop]

Try again.



English, this time.

[Anonymous]

Communism and National Socialism are exact polar opposites.

No, they are not. They are distinguished by a single factor; communism is based on changing the entire world to a socialist paradise. National Socialism is based on the same economic model and government dictatorship but on the basis of a single nation or race. Economically they are based on the same principles.



Communism was never intended by its architect to be implemented in Russia. Marx's intent was to create communism in Germany, because of its highly advanced industrial base and opportunity for workers to be fully employed. Russia was a backward, primitive rural based economy with little industry for worker's to be engaged in. Hitler was well aware that socialism in Germany was the way forward, and to be fair, the country prospered. But the workers were utterly separated from governance.



The Marxist centrally controlled and planned economic model was adopted by Hitler, to much better effect than it was by Lenin, who was hampered by a country far behind the modern world.

All very true, but it will go right over Scouse's thick skull.

[Frood]

Socialism is the gateway drug for communism.

[Aryan]

Communism and National Socialism are exact polar opposites.

No, they are not. They are distinguished by a single factor; communism is based on changing the entire world to a socialist paradise. National Socialism is based on the same economic model and government dictatorship but on the basis of a single nation or race. Economically they are based on the same principles.



Communism was never intended by its architect to be implemented in Russia. Marx's intent was to create communism in Germany, because of its highly advanced industrial base and opportunity for workers to be fully employed. Russia was a backward, primitive rural based economy with little industry for worker's to be engaged in. Hitler was well aware that socialism in Germany was the way forward, and to be fair, the country prospered. But the workers were utterly separated from governance.



The Marxist centrally controlled and planned economic model was adopted by Hitler, to much better effect than it was by Lenin, who was hampered by a country far behind the modern world.

The Communists of today are very different to those of the past. Their perception of the ideology means eradicating borders, merging all races together to create a bland, brown, mixed mono race and the removal of private property. Also everyone would be on the same wage, so for instance a doctor and road sweeper would earn the same amount.  Madness.......



As for National Socialism, it is essentially 'uber' nationalism where the white race is put above all else and Jewish usury is outlawed, along with all the other Jewish/leftist cancers which we have been inflicted with. Cultural Marxism for instance would be one of the first agendas banned and it's promoters imprisoned.  In a nutshell, the Jewish sphere of influence would be crushed, and the media, finance, government and academia would be no longer heavily influenced and controlled by a foreign parasite.  Does it honestly sound so bad to you?

[Bricktop]

And communism would eradicate the aristocracy, the bourgesoise, capitalists, counter revolutionaries, revisionists, and elitists (except, of course, the ruling class).



Every extreme movement has to have its bogeymen. Its how the garner support from the underclass. Hitler demonised the jews to galvanise German support for his lunacy.



Nothing new. Every megalomaniac and demagogue uses the same technique.

[Anonymous]

The Communists of today are very different to those of the past. Their perception of the ideology means eradicating borders, merging all races together to create a bland, brown, mixed mono race and the removal of private property. Also everyone would be on the same wage, so for instance a doctor and road sweeper would earn the same amount.  Madness.......



As for National Socialism, it is essentially 'uber' nationalism where the white race is put above all else and Jewish usury is outlawed, along with all the other Jewish/leftist cancers which we have been inflicted with. Cultural Marxism for instance would be one of the first agendas banned and it's promoters imprisoned.  In a nutshell, the Jewish sphere of influence would be crushed, and the media, finance, government and academia would be no longer heavily influenced and controlled by a foreign parasite.  Does it honestly sound so bad to you?

All parties evolve over time you moron. The Democrats are no longer the party of Jim Crow. Modern socialists have betrayed the labour movement. Conservatives today in Canada and the UK are further left than socialists in the mid 90's



Communism and fascism/national socialism were nearly identical. If you love dictators so much wo aren't spurious, than I suggest than you read about Francisco Franco or Augusto Pinochet. Than again, if you too fucking lazy and stupid to absorb anything about your favourite dead dictator, why would you read nationalist dictators who weren't reds.