Canada in Decay

[Angry White Male]

This won't be a 10 second read.  So, some know I have purchased the book Canada in Decay by Ricardo Duchesne.  I have now read it.



I wanted to know exactly what set up the chain of events that caused every Western Nation to drastically change its demographics into what we see today.



This book is 350 pages long, so I've decided to only re-post what I believe is one of the most important 'sub-chapters' of this book.  There is much that happened before and after, but if I could post only one excerpt, the following would be it.



Remember, Canada was the very first to implement this 'prototype.'  Australia emulates it almost exactly, as do most all other Western Nations now in one form or another.  This is why I think this is of importance in a global fashion, as it seemed to have first been implemented here, and then spread to other nations.



I typed the entire re-post out manually, so if you complain TL/DR, you need as fucking slap!  As I have listed the work and the author, there should be no copyright issues, as it is a short excerpt.



And the Trudeau in this excerpt was the father of the clown that's currently our PM.

[Angry White Male]

Excerpt 1 of 2.





We shall return later to the varying, conflicting meanings inside the word "multiculturalism".  What I like to challenge now is the widespread belief that in calling Canada "multicultural" Trudeau was describing a factual reality about Canada.  When he said "biculturalism does not properly describe our society; multiculturalism is more accurate," he was not describing Canada as it was then, a nation with a population that was 74 percent British and French, and 96 percent European.  The Aboriginal and the Asian population combined stood at only 2.6 percent.  The entire nation was Anglo and French in its institutions: the legal system with its common and civil laws; the political system with the Parliament and the Assemblee nationale du Quebec, the Protestant and Catholic religions and churches, everything, the entire English and French educational systems, based on subjects and books created and written by Whites, was from top to bottom, Anglo-French in character.



He did say in his 1962 essay that creating a polyethnic Canada would be an "experiment of major proportions".  He was envisioning multiculturalism as a project for the future against the past.  Canada was not going to become "a brilliant prototype for the moulding of tomorrow's civilization" merely by acknowledging its intra-European diversity or by fighting discrimination against a small number of minorities.  The goal was to create a new Canadian identity based on the cultures of the world.  By creating a Canada based on liberal ideas separated from any founding culture, Canada would showcase itself to the world as "a brilliant prototype" for the solution of ethnic conflict within nation states.



Trudeau blamed nationalism for having created "the scene of the most devastating wars, the worst atrocities and the most degrading collective hatred the world has ever seen."  He inherited and accepted the normative climate of the post-WWII era against ethnic nationalism and racism.  He also accepted the notion that liberal rights should be seen as human rights extendable to all humans in the world.  But he took the spiral one step further in believing that cultural nationalism, no less than ethnic and racial nationalism, was a major source of human conflict and degradation of the human rights of individuals.  The way to break cultural nationalism, he concluded, was to populate the nation with different cultures.



Hugh Forbes, a supporter of Trudeau's dream, has observed that it was clear from the moment official multiculturalism was instituted in 1971 that its success would "obviously depend on the deliberate diversification of the Canadian population".  Accordingly, during the 1970's, Forbes notes:  "Canadian immigration offices were opened in various Third World countries to facilitate processing of applicants, and the number of immigrants coming from these 'non-traditional sources' increased dramatically".



Trudeau viewed these immigrants from "non-traditional sources" as members of "vibrant ethnic groups," and, in full acceptance of the notion that Third World peoples were more substantively cultural than Westerners, he actually said that they:  "would give Canadians of the second, third, and subsequent generations a feeling that they are connected with tradition and with human experience in various parts of the world and different periods of time".



Canadians on their own, apparently, lacked a real culture other than a set of modern conveniences and a liberal constitution intended for all citizens.



In pursuance of this prototype vibrancy, the Trudeau administration increased Third World immigration immediately after 1971.  There was already a crescendo in Third World immigration after the 1967 Regulations, with the proportion of immigrants from Asia and the Caribbean increasing from 10 percent in 1965-6 to 23 percent 1969-1970.  The 1970's saw an acceleration of this trend; of the 1.5 million immigrants who came to Canada between 1971 and 1981, 33 percent came from Asia, 16 percent from the Caribbean and South America, and 5.5 percent from Africa.  Contrast this to the fact that in 1961 only 2 percent of immigrants were from Asia, and 0.6 from "other" non-European countries.



Along with these numbers, the Trudeau government took some decisive measures to push Canada in a multicultural direction.  An estimated $200 million was set aside in the 1970's (which would equal 1.25 billion dollars today) to assist cultural groups to "retain and foster their identity," to overcome "barriers" to the full participation of immigrants in Canadian society, to promote "creative exchanges among all Canadian cultural groups," and to promote among immigrants at least one of the official languages.  A "Directorate" within the Department of Secretary of State was created in 1972 to assist in the implementation of these initiatives.  A particular task of this Directorate was to protect the human rights of ethnic minorities, to combat racial discrimination by White Canadians, and to persuade Canadians that immigrant diversity was really good for them.  Then, in 1973, an entire "Ministry of Multiculturalism" was created "to monitor the implementation of multicultural initiatives within government departments".  This was soon followed by another bureaucratic body, "Canadian Ethnocultural Council," to encourage ethnic organizations to participate in Canada's government.  Plans were also put in place for the housing and education of immigrants, and the removal of "racially discriminatory barriers" across Canadian society.



Between 1971 and 1982, there was an "explosion of academic research into ethnicity."  Eighty-eight scholarly works on cultural minorities were published, numerous collections of papers, and many symposiums on Canadian ethnic groups were held, the beginning of a "bonanza of remarkable proportions" in the study of multiculturalism during the 1980s and 1990s.  Multiculturalism, as we will see next, would be further consolidated by Trudeau with a new Immigration Act in 1976, a Human Rights Act in 1977, and a whole new constitution, The Charter of Rights, in 1982.



Trudeau, and the liberal establishment, believed that this nullification of Anglo-Quebecois cultural nationalism was necessary to create a "brilliant prototype" for the overcoming of human divisions and the creation of Utopia on earth.  Whites were guilty for colonizing the magnificently egalitarian and humanitarian peoples of the Third World.  But now they would be redeemed by creating a multicultural order that would allow the Third World to flourish inside Canada.  As Forbes happily put it:  "Canadian multiculturalism now promises a way of incorporating the Third World into the First World without domination or oppression".

[Angry White Male]

Excerpt 2 of 2.





But why would it have been illiberal for Canada to affirm its bicultural heritage since the overwhelming majority of its citizens in 1971 were Anglo-Quebecois, and all the institutions and values came from this majority?  Because Trudeau, as a member of the immediate post-WWII generation, had inherited the normative climate of his generation.  He sincerely believed that Western nations should be based on civic values alone, rather than any form of collective identity prioritizing one cultural group over another.  He also believed that Third World peoples were victimized humans in need of human rights and a great source for the making of Canada into a prototype polyethnic nation.  In the language of Carl Schmitt, Trudeau endorsed the post-WWII idea that human conflict was a result of racial and cultural divisions.  He took it upon himself to be the first Western leader to make a nation, Canada, into a prototype for the harmonious co-existence of multiple cultures without relations of dominance.  By making culture a private choice, he thought that Canada would get rid of the friend-enemy distinction, and thus abolish human conflict forever.  The key was to decouple Canada from its historic Anglo-Quebecois traditions by populating it with peoples from multiple cultures and races and making cultural identity a private affair.  Cultural nationalism, not just ethnic nationalism, was inconsistent with liberalism.  Only a multi-racial population, not a European population, would allow Canada to stand as a "brilliant prototype" for the future of humanity.

[Angry White Male]

In a nutshell, there were many factors at play that led up to what we see now.



WWII was the 'igniter.'  Only after WWII and the subsequent forming of the United Nations, did these new 'policies' get implemented.



The non-Western UN members have also pressured the West to 'make up' for previous 'racism' by permitting their peoples to immigrate to the West, which the West now often honours.  Previously, immigrants from many of these nations would not have been permitted citizenship, except in small numbers.

[Anonymous]

Too much  reading Mel.

[Wazzzup]

cultural nationalism, no less than ethnic and racial nationalism, was a major source of human conflict and degradation of the human rights of individuals. The way to break cultural nationalism, he concluded, was to populate the nation with different cultures.



Canadians on their own, apparently, lacked a real culture other than a set of modern conveniences and a liberal constitution intended for all citizens.

I think that is exactly right--The leftists anti-nationalism (globalism) goes to the other extreme.  It says all cultures are vaild except the host culture.  So rather than assimilate other cultures, other cultures are invited to come in and take over and take control instead.  



And in much of the western world that is happening.  Especially in Europe, where a very aggressive, nationalistic culture of Islam is taking over, and the leftist globalists are facilitating that takeover every step of the way .



Nationalism when it means conquering others is immoral .  Anti-nationalism is suicidal and stupid.  Can't we find something in between instead?

[realgrimm]

TLDR: Canada is dying and will never be the same..RIP freedom

[Zetsu]

I have to agree with Mel's point, mass immigration needs to be stopped if we want to preserve Canada.  Vancouver is already no doubt a colony of China and only God knows will those ppl people stick up for Canada if we ever go to war with another country, chances are they'll just flee with all their money.

[Wazzzup]

I have to agree with Mel's point, mass immigration needs to be stopped if we want to preserve Canada.  Vancouver is already no doubt a colony of China and only God knows will those ppl people stick up for Canada if we ever go to war with another country, chances are they'll just flee with all their money.

I agree.  Western nations need to slow down immigration to small amounts of people



Unfortunately the opposite is happening



Canada Welcomed a Record 320,932 New Immigrants Over the Past Year, With Immigration Numbers Set to Increase Even Further

https://www.cicnews.com/2016/09/canada-welcomed-record-320932-new-immigrants-immigration-numbers-set-increase-098533.html#gs.5WOpLcY">https://www.cicnews.com/2016/09/canada- ... gs.5WOpLcY">https://www.cicnews.com/2016/09/canada-welcomed-record-320932-new-immigrants-immigration-numbers-set-increase-098533.html#gs.5WOpLcY



Between 2010 and 2016, 8.1 million new immigrants settled in the United States.



Unless these numbers are reduced significantly, I predict this will lead to balkanization and tribalism (less happy words for multiculturalism)

[Wazzzup]

"experiment of major proportions".

that's another thing. why not experiment where there is little to lose.  Like Uganda.  make it multicultural with no racial majority and see how it works out.  If it fails, no big loss.



But If canada fails that is a huge loss.  One of the nicest places on the earth may be ruined because leftists decided to "expirement" with it



bear in mind that the lefts past expermients haven't worked out all that well-- Cuba, the Soviet Union, Cambodia, Mao's China.,



Why the hell should we trust them?

[Berry Sweet]

BC is destroyed.  All the mayor's of every city are into the middle eastern immigrants and refugees along with ridiculous bike lanes that no one uses.  They seem to have forgotten about the Native Indians and existing Canadians.  



Press 1 for Engrish....

[Anonymous]

The feds whether it be the Grits or the former Tory government use cultural grants to buy votes within cultural communities.

[Anonymous]

The feds whether it be the Grits or the former Tory government use cultural grants to buy votes within cultural communities.

That is the ugly side of multiculturalism.

[Anonymous]

"experiment of major proportions".

that's another thing. why not experiment where there is little to lose.  Like Uganda.  make it multicultural with no racial majority and see how it works out.  If it fails, no big loss.



But If canada fails that is a huge loss.  One of the nicest places on the earth may be ruined because leftists decided to "expirement" with it



bear in mind that the lefts past expermients haven't worked out all that well-- Cuba, the Soviet Union, Cambodia, Mao's China.,



Why the hell should we trust them?

It wasn't an experiment. Scumbags like Pierre Trudeau knew the damage they were causing.

[Angry White Male]

Too much  reading Mel.

TLDR: Canada is dying and will never be the same..RIP freedom

I typed the entire re-post out manually, so if you complain TL/DR, you need as fucking slap!

If I could take the time to input words manually from a book into digital form, like a fucking secretary used to do, you do NOT complain about 'too much reading!'