the leftist fascist hate parade thread-The latest news on violence and other despicable behavior by the left

[Aryan]

I wonder what the SPLC or ADL say about ANTIFA? Do they ever condemn their violence? Heck what am I saying, these organisations probably fund them, along with Soros and co.....

[Anonymous]

I wonder what the SPLC or ADL say about ANTIFA? Do they ever condemn their violence? Heck what am I saying, these organisations probably fund them, along with Soros and co.....

Not even the American Democratic Party will condemn their violence, so I wouldn't expect similar organizations to Antifa to condemn their brothers in arms.

[Anonymous]

I wonder what the SPLC or ADL say about ANTIFA? Do they ever condemn their violence? Heck what am I saying, these organisations probably fund them, along with Soros and co.....

Not even the American Democratic Party will condemn their violence, so I wouldn't expect similar organizations to Antifa to condemn their brothers in arms.

The US Democratic party has become the political arm of brown shirt prog fascist violence.

[Wazzzup]

Tex-Mex Diner Faces Death Threats for Feeding Jeff Sessions

https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-loco-tex-mex-diner-faces-death-threats-for-feeding-jeff-sessions/">https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-lo ... -sessions/">https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-loco-tex-mex-diner-faces-death-threats-for-feeding-jeff-sessions/

Anti-Trump protesters were driven muy loco – stricken by Trump Derangement Syndrome – after a Houston Tex-Mex restaurant served a meal to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.



El Tiempo Cantina posted a photograph of chef Domenic Laurenzo alongside the attorney general with a message noting what an honor it was to serve Sessions.



It wasn't long before a mob of angry trolls descended on the beloved local restaurant – demanding apologies and calling for a boycott.



The hate and vitriol became so severe the restaurant owners shut down their social media pages.



"People are insulting us in such a dramatic fashion, and we feel like we don't deserve it," owner Roland Laurenzo told ABC 13. "At least temporarily I had it taken down because I don't want to be insulted, my children to be insulted, my family to be insulted."



He also wrote a message explaining that the restaurant was not making any kind of political statement.



"The man came to dinner and he was served without us even thinking about the political situations," he wrote. "The only thing on our minds was serving great food and giving great customer service."



And now they've become the victims of a rampaging mob of anti-Trump haters.



"We have gotten so many complaints and comments," he told television station KHOU. "And threats, death threats. This has been extremely shocking to our family."



Rep. Maxine Waters and Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin must be so proud of their goon squad.

The left loves minorities (in this case Hispanics) as long as they toe the liberal plantation line, if not  they will rip them to pieces.

[Anonymous]

Tex-Mex Diner Faces Death Threats for Feeding Jeff Sessions

https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-loco-tex-mex-diner-faces-death-threats-for-feeding-jeff-sessions/">https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-lo ... -sessions/">https://www.toddstarnes.com/show/muy-loco-tex-mex-diner-faces-death-threats-for-feeding-jeff-sessions/

Anti-Trump protesters were driven muy loco – stricken by Trump Derangement Syndrome – after a Houston Tex-Mex restaurant served a meal to Attorney General Jeff Sessions.



El Tiempo Cantina posted a photograph of chef Domenic Laurenzo alongside the attorney general with a message noting what an honor it was to serve Sessions.



It wasn't long before a mob of angry trolls descended on the beloved local restaurant – demanding apologies and calling for a boycott.



The hate and vitriol became so severe the restaurant owners shut down their social media pages.



"People are insulting us in such a dramatic fashion, and we feel like we don't deserve it," owner Roland Laurenzo told ABC 13. "At least temporarily I had it taken down because I don't want to be insulted, my children to be insulted, my family to be insulted."



He also wrote a message explaining that the restaurant was not making any kind of political statement.



"The man came to dinner and he was served without us even thinking about the political situations," he wrote. "The only thing on our minds was serving great food and giving great customer service."



And now they've become the victims of a rampaging mob of anti-Trump haters.



"We have gotten so many complaints and comments," he told television station KHOU. "And threats, death threats. This has been extremely shocking to our family."



Rep. Maxine Waters and Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin must be so proud of their goon squad.

The left loves minorities (in this case Hispanics) as long as they toe the liberal plantation line, if not  they will rip them to pieces.

Jesus Christ, progs keep getting nuttier.

[Bricktop]

I think its time to right a wrong.



Calling these thugs "fascists" is a dangerous misnomer...as it attributes to them a belief system that is utterly incongruous.



They are communists. They only distinguish from the former extreme embodied by the Soviet Union in that they replace "workers" in their manifesto with "immigrants and non-whites".



They regard themselves as "revolutionaries" and justify their violence in exactly the same way as communist agitators did; violence is the ONLY way to defeat capitalist dictatorship.

[Wazzzup]

I think its time to right a wrong.



Calling these thugs "fascists" is a dangerous misnomer...as it attributes to them a belief system that is utterly incongruous.



They are communists. They only distinguish from the former extreme embodied by the Soviet Union in that they replace "workers" in their manifesto with "immigrants and non-whites".



They regard themselves as "revolutionaries" and justify their violence in exactly the same way as communist agitators did; violence is the ONLY way to defeat capitalist dictatorship.

I think you're right and, that was what I tried to explain to peaches-- that the old marxism was workers versus capitalists and the new marxism is minorities against non whites



So I agree 100% with that aspect.  



The problem is calling them communists has little impact.  In spite of communism killing way more than German and Italian fascism did, people don't have a visceral response to that charge, because Hitler and nazism takes up all the oxygen in the room.  



There are some good reasons to call them fascists-

As mentioned, it has greater impact and grabs people's attention

Their tactics are fascist in nature, they are behaving like Hitler's brownshirts

These days fascism has becoming synonymous with totalitarianism and authoritarianism, i.e., forcing people to do things.

When it comes down to it, totalitarian systems are not that different from each other  



Their views are much like nazis racial views in mirror image.  Instead of whites at the top of the pyramid, for prognazis, it is everybody against whites.



(although to Hitler it was germans at the top)

[Bricktop]

Fascist tactics were actually quite different. Their "brown shirts" were not rabble rousing student brats, but a properly organised and managed intimidatory force intended to brutalise opponents, specifically Jews.



Street riots, civil disturbances and "people power" are tools of the left, with it's origins dating back to the French revolution...then copied by the Russians. Communists do not call their community based lieutenants "activists" for nothing. They are required to activate social disruption and unrest. It is the primary tool of the LEFT. It is why you won't see the same conduct from the right...it is not in their DNA. Activists were often called "rabble rousers", as their job was to forment street riots by "rabble" (as opposed to the highly organised street thuggery of the right). The fascist "brown shirts" were more often than not used to forcibly attack socialist driven street protests.



Communism is premised on civil insurrection from the "working" class, who have no other option because the ruling class ignores them...or so Marx proposed.



Communism depends on civil instability and fear to whip the "masses" into a frenzy that spearheads a forcible takeover of government.



This is not a tactic employed by the right.



This "antifa" mob is organised in the true socialist manner. Take over the streets, take down the government. They use old school socialist tactics. There is nothing new here. Their strategy is pure Communism, with a different downtrodden class as their raison d'etre.



Nor is it spontaneous. This rise of leftist extremism has been a long time coming...but they are nothing if not patient...again, a socialist trait. They play a long game.



They will not go away quietly, if history is any guide. Within their ranks, psychotic sociopaths gather the more extreme around them, seeking ways of using the most extremes of violence against their enemy.

[Anonymous]

Commies and fascist despite claiming to hate each other are very similar.

[Bricktop]

They share similar economic models, but their political structures are different.



Communism is centered on a global imperative. Marx postulated that communism would dominate the world, and only THEN would a "worker's paradise" become reality. Communism's enemy was Capitalism.



Fascism is more nationally or racially based. It focusses on achieving a national supremacy over other nations (or "race").



Marx claimed that Communism and Capitalism cannot co-exist in the world. Hitler simply wanted German superiority over other nations.



They were implemented quite differently. Hitler was elected and asked to form a Government. The extreme right tends to subvert the political system to claim some form of legitimacy, whereas the left claim legitimacy from acting for a just and noble "cause" (worker's rights, racial equality yada yada yada). Right wing dictators also tend to seduce the military into siding with them, offering a share of power to assist in taking and keeping political power. The left also try to engage the military, but this is much harder in modern times with most militaries well equipped and well paid.



But at the end of the day, a dictatorship is a dictatorship, regardless of the colour of its flag.



Our dilemma is that the greater the civil unrest, the more likely a dictatorship will emerge "In the interests of national safety and security".

[Anonymous]

I know communism is global, but fascism seeks strategic alliances too.

[Bricktop]

The goal of communism is global domination of socialism, where no other socio-political system can (and in their view, should, exist).



Fascism tends to be more confined to a nation or race. Hitler only wanted dominion over white states, because he believed that the white race was superior and wanted no truck with non-whites, other than as a means to his own end. If Japan wanted Asia, and kept America out of his hair, he was happy to oblige.



But, I repeat, one asshole is the same as another asshole if they rule by force.

[Anonymous]

The goal of communism is global domination of socialism, where no other socio-political system can (and in their view, should, exist).



Fascism tends to be more confined to a nation or race. Hitler only wanted dominion over white states, because he believed that the white race was superior and wanted no truck with non-whites, other than as a means to his own end. If Japan wanted Asia, and kept America out of his hair, he was happy to oblige.



But, I repeat, one asshole is the same as another asshole if they rule by force.

In the early days, Chiang Kai Shek and Mao were allies..



Even though Chiang was an ultra nationalist and Mao a communist they agreed on many things.

[Bricktop]

A union of convenience...the enemy of my enemy is my friend.



Mao was very adept at keeping his friends close...and his enemies closer.

[Anonymous]

A union of convenience...the enemy of my enemy is my friend.



Mao was very adept at keeping his friends close...and his enemies closer.

He was ultimately slicker than Chiang.