Quote from: "JOE"Quote from: "Wazzzup"George Bush is an idiot. So how can he also be the mastermind of a giant conspiracy? Doesn't make sense.Quote from: "JOE"Quote from: "Wazzzup"Ya sure, whatever you say.Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Detective Joe figured it out. 9-11 has to be an inside job, because everybody knows Muslims would never do something like, kill a bunch of infidels,:001_rolleyes:
I'm skeptical of the official explanation as many others are.
You and others blame the disbelievers as undeserved skeptics, but have you ever thought that the US government hasnt entirely come clean nor offered a comprehensive enough explanation to counter these skeptics?
Ie-why was the debris from the buildings hauled away before forensic investigators had a chance to look at it? Or that the bin Laden family was quickly ushered outside the United States before investigators had a chance to question them? Or that many people saw one of the towers fall before a plane hit it? Or that a 3rd tower fell several hours after it was hit. Or that explosions were heard inside the building suggesting that explosives were planted and were the real reason why the towers fell.
It may be possible that the US government's explanation is valid, but if a comprehensive explanation isnt provided then naturally there will be doubters.
The whole investigation into 911 was handled poorly. Also having George W Bush as President didnt exactly exactly inspire confidence from the rest of the world. Even the current President has implied that Bush was an idiot and apart from blaming Bush for 911, Trump has also been on record for blaming Him for the Iraq War and & the subsequent refugee crisis from the Middle East..
So if someone from the Republican Party, a sitting president with Right Wing views has criticized Bush and the way 911 was handled, then why should I accept the official explanation and believe entirely what I am told?
The things you mentioned have been answered/debunked. Look around the web.
OK. Heres a point which has never been answered by the authorities or been debinked.
This MIT engineer asks the very basic question that lay people like myself have.
Why was all the debris from the destroyed buildings hauled away before scientists had a chance to review or examibe the wreckage? This is a very basic procedure which aeronautical engineers & government officials normally undertake when reviewing airplane disasters.
I was more baffled by tower 7 falling without being hit, but I read an article and the explanation seems plausible.
The wreckage SHOULD have been examined. But Here's an analogy--it would be like a forensic specialist not examining the fingernails of a murdered person to check for the attackers DNA. It probably wouldn't be a conspiracy, most likely it would be human error. When human beings are involved in anything mistakes are often made. shit happens.