Quote from: deport_liberals on Today at 11:12:22 AMe.g. aidsman...

Exactly... the gimp.

Pelosi university speech interrupted by anti-Israel agitators: 'Warmonger'

Anti-Israel students interrupted a speech that former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi gave at the University of Oxford in the U.K. on Thursday.

Source: Pelosi university speech interrupted by anti-Israel agitators: 'Warmonger'

Quote from: caskur on Today at 10:27:15 AMEcclesiastes 3:7-8 American Standard Version (ASV)
a time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; a time to love, and a time to hate; a time for war, and a time for peace.


Also going back to the subject on aborting baby Adolf... there is no such thing as an innocent baby although we like to think there is.... all babies are born sinners.

Pretty harsh judgement there. Exactly what act have any of them committed that they need to be judged and by you of all people?

You do know you were a baby once too, do you not? Just checking.

This is one of the areas where the church and I fall out. A nine month old entity, coccooned in the confines of its mother's belly and with no resources other than those provided it via its mother's placenta is not, in my opinion, in a position to do very much at all. That includes sinning. Unless you're gearing up to tell me that in the absence of anything to keep it otherwise occupied so it spends its days masturbating like a champion (I know the church takes a dim view of those practices) but even then, what options are you giving it exactly? It's not like I see mother stuffing Fischer & Paykel playsets up their spadges for Junior to get a head start or anything.

You can cite Ecclesiastes all you like, that infant's "time" is to develop and be nurtured to... what exactly? Get squeezed out of the birth canal, helpless, terrified and crying into a cold and uncaring world to be told "YOU'RE GUILTY" from the moment the hospital lights blind its eyeballs.

That doesn't sound like the doings of a caring and benevolent God to me.... it sounds more like the actions of a raving lunatic.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 11:03:42 AMthere is no civil discourse possible with that raging rhino

Not unless you are willing to simply agree with her stupid fat ass on everything

e.g. aidsman...

Quote from: reaps the honest on Today at 05:01:43 AMEven if her daughter lives with her does that matter ?

I'd say it was a good idea to speak about it with her if she is determined to use it. And you don't know the reason why she wants to use it. Weed has many benifits and is infact better for you than modern day pain killers and sleeping tablets so what's your point. She might need if for reasons you are not aware of.

My oldest will occasionally enjoy some edibles. She lives with her girlfriend, goes to school and works. She can do what she wants.

My second daughter lives at home with me and my man. She does classes and works as a waitress

And she's okay with me talking about this.  She used to have crippling anxiety and she gets PMDD....so every single month she would be doubled over with cramps so bad she would be vomiting.

Our options? Hormonal birthday control. Opiate pain killers. And psychotropic medications.

We didn't like any of that.

One night this kid came to me with a whole presentation about weed and went into why she would like to ask her doctor about a weed card.

You don't need a weed card in MI...you can use recreationally..but she's only 18. So she needed one.

She talked at length with her doctor and now has a weed card.

It has done wonders for her. And yeah she digs it and enjoys the weed.....but who cares? It helps her with real problems.

So long as she's pulling her weight at home with chores, passing classes and working...and is out engaging with her family and friends and not isolating...I have NO problem at all with her enjoying the pot.

If anyone can watch what my poor daughter was going through every month and still have a fucking problem with some weed? That is not the kind of person I'd ever want to be around.

Quote from: caskur on Today at 01:27:34 AMI would rather not let 100 guilty go to save an innocent either...

If it's about numbers, the numbers are going to win every time. If I can prevent death I am going to do it.

People are going to die no matter what. You might very well save a hundred in your murder of one; at the same time you are possibly setting in motion the events that kill thousands or millions that otherwise might have otherwise been long and fruitful lives. You simply do not know the unintended consequences any more than I or anyone else here does.

Ironically, there is one innocent death you assuredly can prevent - namely the little baby Hitler you have sworn to end. Remembering that the events you seek to judge the baby for have yet to be performed and therefore the baby is not guilty of them.

Quote from: caskur on Today at 01:27:34 AMThese people in this thread have no problem sending young innocent men and women off to war to stand between death and their own families.

Now I know you're not talking about me. My grandfather and his brothers were all military (Army and Air Force); they made their choice to accept their commissions in the armed forces in an era where it was considered noble to defend the homeland's interests against foreign incursions. After the war had ended, in my grandfather's case this included a stint in Malaya where among his many duties he was responsible for ordering and in some cases piloting patrols to observe and report on maritime vessels in the region and ensuring non Australian vessels were not going to be roaming about Australia's waters with impunity, stealing your father's fish before he could drag them out of the water.

You'll be happy to know that he lived to a ripe old age, buried with full honours for his service to the country. I cannot say that I agreed with all of his choices, but those were his choices to make. I would not make the choice to cede my moral compass to the whims of some government official or I might surely have followed his example and been fanging about the trophosphere in 100 million dollars worth of hardware and creating carbon footprints to really get your greenies screeching.

I decided I had better dreams to chase and I acted accordingly. None of which included demanding others follow my grandfather's example where I would not. I can make great case for an armed force protecting myself and my fellow countrymen; I cannot and will not sign off on an agreement that makes me party to using that same army to go Hulk-Smash in somebody else's backyard.

No, not even for the corpse of the British Empire.

Quote from: Dove on Today at 11:01:01 AMI'm tryin lol

there is no civil discourse possible with that raging rhino

Not unless you are willing to simply agree with her stupid fat ass on everything

Quote from: Marvin on Today at 04:05:18 AMthe older one she live on her own or still with you though? i'm on your side if she lives on her own two feet but if she is under your roof so to speak still its your rules NOT hers and she can't just do whatever she wants to even if an adult. so if she still lives with you why are you okay she be an addict of weed and god knows what you taught her to inject, smoke, snort, and or swallow. hmm parenting right there

 "An addict of weed"? 

You do t coddle them and allow them unfetted ability to break laws u set the pretense of free speech.

You set these fuckers straight with clear and concise boundaries

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/university-florida-clear-consequences-disruptive-student-faculty-protesters

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 05:47:50 AMYou still trying to be civil with that misreable fat cow?

 I'm tryin lol