Quote from: caskur on Today at 10:11:00 AMI wished you guys would stop talking about this disgusting topic.

The teachers should be jailed if they sexually interfere with minors, flogged first though.

They must be child pornographers I reckon...

I wish these child molesting whores would stop doing it! I bet if they got the death penalty, dumb sluts would think twice and turn to a dildo before a kid.

Quote from: Lokmar on May 24, 2024, 04:15:52 PMAnd you can bet that retard is A-OK when a teacher in libtopia fucks several kids to boot!

I wished you guys would stop talking about this disgusting topic.

The teachers should be jailed if they sexually interfere with minors, flogged first though.

They must be child pornographers I reckon...

Quote from: Logic Sandwich on Today at 09:52:14 AMMaybe in your estimation. I don't know if you remember that whole "Periods for Pence" flap in 2019, but the way he and his office handled the whole affair from its retarded inception had me rolling my eyes.

I was never under any illusion as to what Mike Pence was and is. I said at the time that Trump could have done a lot better than to choose that particular assclown; a good many disagreed or just flat out ignored it.

Pretty much as the various liberals I know that ignored my cautionaries about ignoring what the democrats were shuffling through the door on the sly in 2020. I was right in my estimations there too.

I was thinking as a spokesperson for the COVID response and his veep debate with Harris.

It might seem even strang to see Justice Samuel Alito splashed across the top of Politico's Playbook and the New York Times morning newsletters for the high crime and misdemeanor of flying a nerdy Revolutionary War flag.

But it is part of a deliberate strategy to try to try to combat virtually the only check remaining on the Democrat Party's political power. While Congress and the White House cannot outright remove judges, they can bring real pressure to bear, cast national doubt on rulings, and reform the court even to the point of expanding it.

The reason for all this is the Supreme Court sometimes says no to things Democrats want. Already this year, the court has batted down Trump v. Anderson, in which a state official tried to block Republican candidate Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot for treason. They are currently considering two other cases that could decide what immunities a president has from prosecution for official duties and whether a law designed to prosecute Enron executives can be used to put Jan. 6 rioters and trespassers in prison for years.

"Democrats' Supreme Court Strategy is fourfold," a senior Republican Senate aide told Blaze News: "First, incentivize justices to defect and change their rulings. Second, delegitimize the Court's outputs. Third, provide political cover for aggressive ethics reforms that are stalking horses for bureaucratic controls to kneecap the Republican majority, such as mandatory recusals on the basis of unevenly applied ethical standards. And fourth, create the political conditions necessary for court-packing."

We've watched modern Supreme Court intimidation for years now. President Barack Obama famously broke decorum at the State of the Union, scolding justices to their faces during his 2010 State of the Union. But now it's different.
https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/democrats-have-a-new-playbook-for-pressuring-and-restructuring-the-supreme-court?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202024-05-25&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM&tpcc=email

Democrats are attacking the USSC because it is the only branch of government they cannot control. The independence of the top court was not a problem until they made some decisons the Democrat mafia did not like. Now it's war on the jusicial branch.

Quote from: DKG on Today at 09:20:39 AMI remember watching Gabbard wipe the floor with Kamala Harris in 2016. Tulsi's positions and priorities have changed since then.

I think she could win over some independents. I also think she could be an effective communicator for Trump's policies. But, Mike Pence was at one time too.

Maybe in your estimation. I don't know if you remember that whole "Periods for Pence" flap in 2019, but the way he and his office handled the whole affair from its retarded inception had me rolling my eyes.

I was never under any illusion as to what Mike Pence was and is. I said at the time that Trump could have done a lot better than to choose that particular assclown; a good many disagreed or just flat out ignored it.

Pretty much as the various liberals I know that ignored my cautionaries about ignoring what the democrats were shuffling through the door on the sly in 2020. I was right in my estimations there too.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on May 24, 2024, 07:39:46 PMShe said the quiet part out loud. That they truly believe the niggers and spics are too dumb to vote for anyone but the people she feels are appropriate to lead them. They disobeyed the directive and are now outcasts

typical among cultist degenerates that hold you to their belief system with intimidation, alienation, embarrassment and the threat of ruining you.

She has uttered a lot of Joe Bideneaque comments.

Quote from: Logic Sandwich on Today at 09:37:27 AMsure had no problem with Bill Clinton being their governor after all.

I don't know that he meant "only in the south", just that Arkansas enjoys a reputation for deviant sexual practices. They sure had no problem with Bill Clinton being their governor after all.

Quote from: Oerdin on May 24, 2024, 08:10:12 AMI will believe it when I see the voting results.

Precisely. Still, Trump drawing a large crowd in the Bronx is cause for concern among the Dem leadership.

Quote from: caskur on May 24, 2024, 02:40:26 PMPelosi has retired I believe... that is a good thing.

Nope, she is running for congress again this year. She is eighty four and worth a fortune, all of it derived from her elected office. I guess she doesn't have enough yet.