Quote from: Brent on Today at 03:52:54 PMYou want the States to launch a nuclear strike on China if they take Taiwan? You are crazy.

WUT?

Quote from: Lokmar on Today at 01:38:58 PMMay as well launch actual nukes...because we will.

You want the States to launch a nuclear strike on China if they take Taiwan? You are crazy.

Quote from: Oerdin on May 10, 2024, 03:18:20 PMNot nearly to the same degree and they weren't nearly as unhinged and insane back then.

I thought so.

Quote"blue no matter who"

I can totally relate to that. I was a deep orange NDP supporter when I was young. They are Canada's socialist party. But, when they threw the working class under the bus because their prog financiers forced them to, I bolted from the party.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 12:45:05 PMWell, he is a faggot afterall. Maybe he was under some impression that he could get your cock in his mouth if he made you laugh?

He's an Admin?

Nah... Blurt isn't that desperate or homosexual...

May as well launch actual nukes...because we will.

Secret Service downplays report of petition warning of 'inadequate training': 'Our people are exceptional'

The Secret Service is downplaying a report about a petition that is circulating internally raising concerns about recent incidents involving its agents.

Source: Secret Service downplays report of petition warning of 'inadequate training': 'Our people are exceptional'

Quote from: Frood on Today at 12:43:43 PMI don't know about any of that. I just know about our jovial conversation...

Well, he is a faggot afterall. Maybe he was under some impression that he could get your cock in his mouth if he made you laugh?

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on Today at 12:19:56 PMHere's my take

Leftist of the "blue no matter who" garden variety are cowards.

So of course they are going to seem like nice people with big hearts when you talk to them privately. that's just their cowardliness shining through because They don't have their mobs to reinforce and cheer them on. In such a circumstance they are forced to sink or swim on a personal level based on their own singular merits. So that jelly spine of theirs compels them to be amiable, agreeable .etc etc. Or whatever trait they have observed you find most impressive in a person. And like all narcissists they mirror that back to you. It's a facade. A hologram. A carefully constructed presentation.

You see the real them when they are circling en-mass  like hungry hyenas around some prey they feel lack any means to defend themselves against their hordes. Sure they'll cloak themselves in some fabricated idea that it's all just a troll when pressed, or when they find themselves deep behind enemy lines so to speak. Again, the coward's way out, but it's not a troll, it's the real person they are who is once again shifting because the time is not right to be their true self.


I don't buy it. In my world you cannot be a good person if you are willing to strip the rights of a young girls in sporting events in favor of placating the mental illness of another. While at the same time spouting the narrative that we should "believe all women" when doing so serves to silence the voices of dissent whenever convenient. But then mock a woman relentlessly when she says she feels uncomfortable with a grown ass man changing in her private spaces.  I'm sorry, a person capable of that is never good. In any circumstance. Period. And you are only fooling yourself if you choose to believe otherwise.

And there are literally thousands of other examples we both know exist.


one last example and then I'm done. Remember these are the very same people who will riot, justify anarchy and call down hatred and evil on innocent white people (many times despite being white themselves) in favor of racial justice when a black man is killed at the hands of a white police officer. NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCE. But will have no qualms whatsoever, at the very same time, making derogatory racist slurs about any race whenever they are on the losing side of a debate. Is the definition of racism changed based on who is on the sending or receiving side? Based on the political affiliation? Is being racist against Chinese or Koreans any less lowbrow than being racist against blacks or Latinos? In the mind of the hypocritical intersectionalist it is apparently.

Blurt's racist handle and sewagemongers "blue Korean" repetitive hyperbole are proof positive examples of what I am talking about.

I'm sorry, but anyone who lacks the integrity and personal fortitude to call out wrong when they see no matter the appetite of the audience around them is NOT a good hearted person in my book. Period.

I don't know about any of that. I just know about our jovial conversation...

Quote from: Frood on Today at 10:51:45 AMI get that.

But the thing is... Blurt has a big heart once you speak with him. Same as anyone else on these forums (except Fat Lily).

She has an engorged heart but it's not big.

Here's my take

Leftist of the "blue no matter who" garden variety are cowards.

So of course they are going to seem like nice people with big hearts when you talk to them privately. that's just their cowardliness shining through because They don't have their mobs to reinforce and cheer them on. In such a circumstance they are forced to sink or swim on a personal level based on their own singular merits. So that jelly spine of theirs compels them to be amiable, agreeable .etc etc. Or whatever trait they have observed you find most impressive in a person. And like all narcissists they mirror that back to you. It's a facade. A hologram. A carefully constructed presentation.

You see the real them when they are circling en-mass  like hungry hyenas around some prey they feel lack any means to defend themselves against their hordes. Sure they'll cloak themselves in some fabricated idea that it's all just a troll when pressed, or when they find themselves deep behind enemy lines so to speak. Again, the coward's way out, but it's not a troll, it's the real person they are who is once again shifting because the time is not right to be their true self.


I don't buy it. In my world you cannot be a good person if you are willing to strip the rights of a young girls in sporting events in favor of placating the mental illness of another. While at the same time spouting the narrative that we should "believe all women" when doing so serves to silence the voices of dissent whenever convenient. But then mock a woman relentlessly when she says she feels uncomfortable with a grown ass man changing in her private spaces.  I'm sorry, a person capable of that is never good. In any circumstance. Period. And you are only fooling yourself if you choose to believe otherwise.

And there are literally thousands of other examples we both know exist.


one last example and then I'm done. Remember these are the very same people who will riot, justify anarchy and call down hatred and evil on innocent white people (many times despite being white themselves) in favor of racial justice when a black man is killed at the hands of a white police officer. NO MATTER THE CIRCUMSTANCE. But will have no qualms whatsoever, at the very same time, making derogatory racist slurs about any race whenever they are on the losing side of a debate. Is the definition of racism changed based on who is on the sending or receiving side? Based on the political affiliation? Is being racist against Chinese or Koreans any less lowbrow than being racist against blacks or Latinos? In the mind of the hypocritical intersectionalist it is apparently.

Blurt's racist handle and sewagemongers "blue Korean" repetitive hyperbole are proof positive examples of what I am talking about.

I'm sorry, but anyone who lacks the integrity and personal fortitude to call out wrong when they see no matter the appetite of the audience around them is NOT a good hearted person in my book. Period.