Quote from: Thiel on May 25, 2024, 06:38:02 PMI don't recall blowing inside Stoopmajor's mouth. I might have though. I was a tramp before I met Jo Jo.

That is a WTF moment even by Seamoron standards.

Quote from: Frood on Today at 09:20:25 AMDeSantis would backstab Trump. 

And vice versa. Any person on the ticket is capable of that.

Quote from: Herman on May 25, 2024, 09:52:29 PMJustine is getting frickin desperate. This heavy egress tax is coming.

If Shen and her old man both have to pay it, they will have to pay Justine fifty grand.

I suspected you might post the same misinformation in this thread.

If you leave Canada pernmanently, you must file a final departure tax return. On that day, you will cease to be a resident of Canada and will be deemed to have disposed of all your non-registered investment assets at their fair market value. This is known as a deemed disposition, and you will have to report the capital gains or losses that result from it.

RRSPs, tax free savings accounts (TFSAs), registered education savings plans (RESPs) and your principal residence are not subject to this deemed disposition.

When you leave Canada, the CRA treats certain types of property (such as shares) as if you had sold them at fair market value and reacquired them at the same price. This is called a deemed disposition, and you may have to report that property on your final tax return on leaving the country, if there has been a capital gain (and if it is in an unregistered account). This is also known as departure tax.

If you maintain ties with Canada, such as property, driver's license/vehicle, professional associations, provincial health care, memberships on boards, etc, you are not devering ties and are not subject to the final capital gains tax. But, tnere is no twenty five thousand dollar punitive egress head tax.

Is this clear as mud for you?

Quote from: Herman on May 25, 2024, 08:42:36 PMTrudeau is talking about expanding hid departure tax to stem the flow of Canadians like old Shen Li who have said fuck it and left this country.

If Justine gets backing from Jagmeet it could cost Shen twenty five grand. Her old man another twenty five grand. Justine makes this country horrible, so people leave and then robs them on the way out.

The rich won't care of course. This is another attack on the middle class with in demand skills and the upper middle class. He knows he is killing them, but he won;t let them leave with their own money.

Herman, don't believe every video on youtube just because it aligns with your righteous anger at Trudeau.

It is my job to stay on top of any tax changes and advise my clients accordingly. I have not heard anything about an imminent or even rumoured twenty five thousand dollar departure tax.

Quote from: Shen Li on May 25, 2024, 11:46:53 PMWhite libtards are most odious racist assholes I have ever encountered.

That is often the case.

Quote from: Shen Li on Today at 12:28:33 AMI don't know if she is on his short list and I don't care.

This is what I know about her.

She left the Democratic Party, accusing its leadership of "cowardly wokeness, anti-white racism, (being) hostile to people of faith and spirituality, and dragging us closer to nuclear war". Shortly thereafter, Gabbard endorsed and campaigned for several Republican candidates in the 2022 midterm elections. Among the candidates were Senate candidates Don Bolduc, Adam Laxalt and J. D. Vance, and Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

I would prefer Desantis or Vivek, but Gabbard would help Trump win some indy votes.

Quote from: Odinson on Today at 04:08:53 AMOur peeps are getting raped and murdered...

Yet they speak like we are the more evil side when we use racial slurs.


Same thing in the USA.

How many whites did black people murder in 2023?

Thats right... Whos the one being "hunted".

The Dems reinforce the false narrative that the greatest problem facing the African-American community is police brutality.

Quote from: Conservative Perspective on Today at 04:39:22 AMBillionaire CEO Schwarzman changes course and backs Trump citing rising antisemitism as top concern

Billionaire Steve Schwarzman announced he will be supporting former President Donald Trump after previously calling for the GOP to move on to fresh leadership.

Source: Billionaire CEO Schwarzman changes course and backs Trump citing rising antisemitism as top concern

This has gone too far. Trump relies on small donors, but Biden needs liberal billionaires. His fence sitting will cost his campaign money.

Quote from: Logic Sandwich on May 25, 2024, 09:52:14 AMMaybe in your estimation. I don't know if you remember that whole "Periods for Pence" flap in 2019, but the way he and his office handled the whole affair from its retarded inception had me rolling my eyes.

I was never under any illusion as to what Mike Pence was and is. I said at the time that Trump could have done a lot better than to choose that particular assclown; a good many disagreed or just flat out ignored it.

Pretty much as the various liberals I know that ignored my cautionaries about ignoring what the democrats were shuffling through the door on the sly in 2020. I was right in my estimations there too.

I was thinking as a spokesperson for the COVID response and his veep debate with Harris.

It might seem even strang to see Justice Samuel Alito splashed across the top of Politico's Playbook and the New York Times morning newsletters for the high crime and misdemeanor of flying a nerdy Revolutionary War flag.

But it is part of a deliberate strategy to try to try to combat virtually the only check remaining on the Democrat Party's political power. While Congress and the White House cannot outright remove judges, they can bring real pressure to bear, cast national doubt on rulings, and reform the court even to the point of expanding it.

The reason for all this is the Supreme Court sometimes says no to things Democrats want. Already this year, the court has batted down Trump v. Anderson, in which a state official tried to block Republican candidate Donald Trump from the Colorado ballot for treason. They are currently considering two other cases that could decide what immunities a president has from prosecution for official duties and whether a law designed to prosecute Enron executives can be used to put Jan. 6 rioters and trespassers in prison for years.

"Democrats' Supreme Court Strategy is fourfold," a senior Republican Senate aide told Blaze News: "First, incentivize justices to defect and change their rulings. Second, delegitimize the Court's outputs. Third, provide political cover for aggressive ethics reforms that are stalking horses for bureaucratic controls to kneecap the Republican majority, such as mandatory recusals on the basis of unevenly applied ethical standards. And fourth, create the political conditions necessary for court-packing."

We've watched modern Supreme Court intimidation for years now. President Barack Obama famously broke decorum at the State of the Union, scolding justices to their faces during his 2010 State of the Union. But now it's different.
https://www.theblaze.com/columns/opinion/democrats-have-a-new-playbook-for-pressuring-and-restructuring-the-supreme-court?utm_source=theblaze-dailyAM&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-Newsletter__AM%202024-05-25&utm_term=ACTIVE%20LIST%20-%20TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM&tpcc=email

Democrats are attacking the USSC because it is the only branch of government they cannot control. The independence of the top court was not a problem until they made some decisons the Democrat mafia did not like. Now it's war on the jusicial branch.

Quote from: Biggie Smiles on May 24, 2024, 07:39:46 PMShe said the quiet part out loud. That they truly believe the niggers and spics are too dumb to vote for anyone but the people she feels are appropriate to lead them. They disobeyed the directive and are now outcasts

typical among cultist degenerates that hold you to their belief system with intimidation, alienation, embarrassment and the threat of ruining you.

She has uttered a lot of Joe Bideneaque comments.

Quote from: Logic Sandwich on May 25, 2024, 09:37:27 AMsure had no problem with Bill Clinton being their governor after all.

Quote from: Oerdin on May 24, 2024, 08:10:12 AMI will believe it when I see the voting results.

Precisely. Still, Trump drawing a large crowd in the Bronx is cause for concern among the Dem leadership.

Quote from: caskur on May 24, 2024, 02:40:26 PMPelosi has retired I believe... that is a good thing.

Nope, she is running for congress again this year. She is eighty four and worth a fortune. All of it derived from her elected office. I guess she doesn't have enough money yet.

I remember watching Gabbard wipe the floor with Kamala Harris in 2016. Tulsi's positions and priorities have changed since then.

I think she could win over some independents. I also think she could be an effective communicator for Trump's policies. But, Mike Pence was at one time too.