News:
SMF - Just Installed!
- Welcome to THeBlueCashew.
Recent posts
#91
Now Fat Lily and AIDSmin are moaning on and on about Aryan
#92
As Jonathan Turley said, "the Biden-Harris administration has proved to be the most anti-free speech administration in two centuries. You have to go back to John Adams' administration to find the equal of this administration."
Harris has been an outspoken champion of censorship in an administration that supports targeting disinformation, misinformation and "malinformation." That last category was defined by the Biden administration as information "based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate."
In the debate, Walz also returned to his favorite dismissal of censorship objections by saying that it is all just inflammatory rhetoric.
Recently, Walz went on MSNBC to support censoring disinformation and declared, "There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy."
That is entirely untrue and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the right called "indispensable" by the Supreme Court. Even after some of us condemned his claim as ironically dangerous disinformation, Walz continues to repeat it.
This is why, for the free speech community, the prospect of a Harris-Walz administration is chilling. Where President Joe Biden was viewed as supporting censorship out of political opportunism, Harris and Walz are viewed as true believers.
We are living through the most dangerous anti-free speech movement in American history. We have never before faced the current alliance of government, corporate, academic and media forces aligned against free speech. A Harris-Walz administration with a supportive Congress could make this right entirely dispensable.
Harris has been an outspoken champion of censorship in an administration that supports targeting disinformation, misinformation and "malinformation." That last category was defined by the Biden administration as information "based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate."
In the debate, Walz also returned to his favorite dismissal of censorship objections by saying that it is all just inflammatory rhetoric.
Recently, Walz went on MSNBC to support censoring disinformation and declared, "There's no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech, and especially around our democracy."
That is entirely untrue and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the right called "indispensable" by the Supreme Court. Even after some of us condemned his claim as ironically dangerous disinformation, Walz continues to repeat it.
This is why, for the free speech community, the prospect of a Harris-Walz administration is chilling. Where President Joe Biden was viewed as supporting censorship out of political opportunism, Harris and Walz are viewed as true believers.
We are living through the most dangerous anti-free speech movement in American history. We have never before faced the current alliance of government, corporate, academic and media forces aligned against free speech. A Harris-Walz administration with a supportive Congress could make this right entirely dispensable.
#93
Quote from: Prof Emeritus at Fawk U on October 02, 2024, 02:19:51 PMAt least Tim didn't say 'We finally beat Medicare'.
#94
#95
Quote from: Cyrus on October 03, 2024, 04:37:42 PMThis is a very sexual community.Jo Jo and I are.
#96
This is a very sexual community.
#97
News & Current Events / Harris dodges answering whethe...
Last post by Conservative Perspective - October 03, 2024, 03:59:39 PMHarris dodges answering whether athletes should stand during national anthem in unearthed interview
Vice President Kamala Harris did not answer directly whether athletes should stand during the national anthem, an unearthed media interview in 2016 shows.
Source: Harris dodges answering whether athletes should stand during national anthem in unearthed interview
Vice President Kamala Harris did not answer directly whether athletes should stand during the national anthem, an unearthed media interview in 2016 shows.
Source: Harris dodges answering whether athletes should stand during national anthem in unearthed interview
#98
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 03, 2024, 03:12:37 PMThe fact that their minds always seems to gravitate towards children is very tellingOnly sick minds like the whale and the diddler could connect the the two.
What could Vance's children possibly have to do with him eviscerating Walz on Tuesday?
#99
The fact that their minds always seems to gravitate towards children is very telling
What could Vance's children possibly have to do with him eviscerating Walz on Tuesday?
What could Vance's children possibly have to do with him eviscerating Walz on Tuesday?
#100
Tulsi Gabbard and Kennedy telling it like it is.