Quote from: Brent on Today at 11:23:14 AMTrudeau smears people who disagree with his prog tyranny as racists all the time.
He defines hate speech as any speech he hates.
you know what I hate most about modern leftists? The fact that no matter the circumstance, context or clarity of the facts they cannot, ever, accept with dignity and decency any outcome which does not align perfectly with whatever narrative they've decided fits their perception of reality the best. They act like spoiled children whenever it is that they don't get their way.
A court ruling comes out in favor of whatever it is they see as opposition? It's wrong. It has to be wrong. For only THEY know best. The unique circumstances or Facts of the matter be damned. If it does not have the happy ending favorable to their ideology we then need to place in however many additional like minded activist justices it will take to achieve their objective. Period. So the point was never to produce a just outcome. Just an outcome THEY felt was just.
Electoral college results in single conservative election win in the course of several democrat wins it must be flawed and therefore dismantled in favor of whatever system has the highest probability of consistently producing the results they desire
They can never agree upon a set of standards, rules, procedures which they won't then turn around and demand be struck down should the same prove unable to produce the results they want 100 out of 100 times. It's an ever moving and shifting goalpost and set of standards, which, in the end tells intelligent people one thing. In the system they are seeking to produce there are no set of standards. There is no consistent set of rules with these people. there's only what THEY want whenever they want it, and we are to abide and obey because they know what is best for everyone, everywhere.
And when asked why this is so and why we have to take their word for it? NO credible philosophy or policy directive which has produced sound and repeatable results in the past. No consistent and well thought out plan demonstrating a true desire to make things better. Nope. None of that.
You get assholes like LotusPrune or Fat Lily giving you the standard liberal response which comes in basically one of two forms or both, depending on the depth to which you've sunk them in their own bullshit
It could be a) two pronged ad hominem attack where they both seek to discredit your intelligence and/or credentials; while at the same time proudly presenting to you a reference to a document which basically amounts to a participation prize that is awarded to ANYONE who can both sit through the inanity of the program in it's entirety and is dumb enough to incur the debt required to receive it.
Or
They engage in the distraction tactics and use fancy little terms like "it's nuanced" , "that's a a non-squitor" or my new favorite "you need a course in logic to have this debate with me"
slick, no seriously, putting up pay walls when someone is both capable of seeing and calling you on your bullshit.