News:
SMF - Just Installed!
- Welcome to THeBlueCashew.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 01:59:51 PMPosted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 01:11:07 PMwhy are we placating mental and moral decay instead of addressing it with the proper response.
all throughout humanity there were simply those who should not be allowed to continue on this earth.
The cannanites
the sick fuckers in Sodom and Gomorrah
the cockroaches of Noah's day
you know what? Fuck it, I'm not even going to pretend anymore. exterminate these fucking twisted fucking reprobates.
these animals on the left want to cry about free speech when some cockroach who is inciting violence at tax payer funded universities is restrained from doing so?
while at the same time depriving a Christian baker in Colorado his right to worship his God in the manner he sees fit which ONLY involves NOT using his talents to foster mental illness?
cry me a river... you fuckers need to go. It's the only way civilization can survive
I used to have a much more middle of the road attitude on this. Ie if some whack job wants to pretend he's a woman so what? But now I've seen that if you give evil an inch before you know it it will be up your arm and in your ass.
fuck that. rid society of this scourge already
all throughout humanity there were simply those who should not be allowed to continue on this earth.
The cannanites
the sick fuckers in Sodom and Gomorrah
the cockroaches of Noah's day
you know what? Fuck it, I'm not even going to pretend anymore. exterminate these fucking twisted fucking reprobates.
these animals on the left want to cry about free speech when some cockroach who is inciting violence at tax payer funded universities is restrained from doing so?
while at the same time depriving a Christian baker in Colorado his right to worship his God in the manner he sees fit which ONLY involves NOT using his talents to foster mental illness?
cry me a river... you fuckers need to go. It's the only way civilization can survive
I used to have a much more middle of the road attitude on this. Ie if some whack job wants to pretend he's a woman so what? But now I've seen that if you give evil an inch before you know it it will be up your arm and in your ass.
fuck that. rid society of this scourge already
Posted by Biggie Smiles
- Today at 01:03:39 PMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 12:54:18 PMI finally finished watching the last part of this a minute ago. God should obliterate America for having that tranny filth in government. That shit infuriates me like you cant believe.
any man who wants to walk around in public pretending to be a woman needs to be sedated and placed into a mental health facility. If he cannot be cured of this mental disease then he needs to be strangled and disposed of
enough of this shit already
but here, instead of doing the right thing, we allow these sick fuckers a voice in our government and prop them up like some kind of role model to our children
THIS IS A SICK FUCKING INDIVIDUAL. WHY IS THAT SO HARD FOR LIBTARDS TO UNDERSTAND?
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 12:54:18 PMQuote from: Biggie Smiles on April 28, 2025, 08:27:14 PMmaybe you haven't heard but Trump was impeached today
and no... the clown you see filing the articles of impeachment is NOT part of an SNL skit
this is real
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMF8vnKtiHQ
I finally finished watching the last part of this a minute ago. God should obliterate America for having that tranny filth in government. That shit infuriates me like you cant believe.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 12:35:06 PMQuote from: King Raho on Today at 11:10:39 AMIt's been said that communists hate America. Let's assume that is genuinely the case for the purpose of argument.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
You are absolutely correct. No argument here. We need a civil war and 30 million dead will be a good start.
Having lived long enough to observe politics of both sides, I've seen the left steadily throw tantrums while the right takes it on the chin because its bad form for them to punch back. I could give days and days of example. Now, the right via Trump has said "fuck that shit" and as a result, the left is all "HOW VERY DARE YOU DEFEND YOURSELF" and are bound to teach people like me a lesson. Well, IDGAF if me and my whole family die, I'm sick of the bullshit.
I genuinely wish Trump would declare himself literal hitler and begin the executions.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 12:24:12 PMQuote from: King Raho on Today at 11:55:07 AMRand Paul did disappoint, I will admit. If he were representing the libtards, they'd be screaming about primarying him the minute he showed any divergence from the party line.
He's being a useful idiot/Libertarian idealist yet would surely go for eliminating income taxes and bringing back manufacturing on principal too.
Great, but some eggs got to get cracked to make an omelet and while I find Trump's incessant use of EO's disturbing too, he and his ilk in the Legislative Branch have been content to do fuck-all for numerous decades.
Why now does he want to start doing his job properly? They haven't done a thing to shield the President from Judicial activism....so Rand can eat a bucket of dicks and stfu.
Posted by King Raho
- Today at 11:55:07 AMRand Paul did disappoint, I will admit. If he were representing the libtards, they'd be screaming about primarying him the minute he showed any divergence from the party line.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 11:28:30 AMQuote from: King Raho on Today at 11:10:39 AMIt's been said that communists hate America. Let's assume that is genuinely the case for the purpose of argument.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
It's a damned if you do and damned if you don't scenario.
People see nominated and sworn in position holders who seem sane but who do 180's once in office and the courts....and the people begin to realize they can't argue with an obvious slow moving coup.
Like Pam Bondi instituting Real ID, not releasing the Epstein files, considering weapons bans.... or Mike Johnson being a shit weasel... Rand Paul crossing the floor to torpedo tariffs... Amy Coney Barrett, Roberts, and Kavanaugh betraying at almost every chance they get....
Yeah, people simply stop bothering to hope for a peaceful restoration because the whole system has been gamed and their leaders are compromised by dark unseen forces.
Posted by King Raho
- Today at 11:10:39 AMIt's been said that communists hate America. Let's assume that is genuinely the case for the purpose of argument.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 10:52:02 AMThey can impeach him every fucking day. IDGAF.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 10:49:00 AMPosted by DKG
- Today at 10:30:08 AMQuote from: Frood on Today at 10:26:09 AMThey try it again and the US is likely to have a civil war.I don't think Dems are tired of it.
People are tired of the lawfare, lies, and obstructionists.
Posted by Frood
- Today at 10:26:09 AMQuote from: DKG on Today at 10:01:02 AMImpeaching the president will be the Dems' top priority if they win back the House and they probably will.
They try it again and the US is likely to have a civil war.
People are tired of the lawfare, lies, and obstructionists.
Posted by DKG
- Today at 10:01:02 AMQuote from: Oliver the Second on April 28, 2025, 10:33:55 PMBig deal, they already impeached him twice and look where he is now - sitting in the White House!Impeaching the president will be the Dems' top priority if they win back the House and they probably will.
Impeach away!
Posted by Oliver the Second
- April 28, 2025, 10:33:55 PMBig deal, they already impeached him twice and look where he is now - sitting in the White House!
Impeach away!