News:

R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk!


Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Is Alticus a dick sucking fairy? (answer is opposite of no):
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by .
 - October 11, 2025, 06:09:35 AM
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 10, 2025, 05:21:08 PMSo now the latest leftist weaping point is that EVERYONE in America commits this type of mortgage fraud
Wait, so we can expect a whole heap more indictments then? Cool!  :laughinatu:
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 10, 2025, 05:21:08 PM
So now the latest leftist weaping point is that EVERYONE in America commits this type of mortgage fraud

well, yeah, and EVERYONE IN America has either stretched the truth a little or outright lied on a credit app, home loan app, job application and a whole littany of other documents where such fabrications are supposed to be taboo.

But they are not prosecuted for it now are they? no, but you prosecuted this man for it and I say what comes around goes around, bitch

cope

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRsyy15txSw
Posted by .
 - October 10, 2025, 12:12:14 PM
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 10, 2025, 11:53:49 AMAmen brother.

Going out fighting here. The only cheek that's turning on me is the one attached to my right leg as the right foot is going up some libtard's asshole the day they try some offensive bullshit on me or someone I love.

This is why I was so thoroughly sickened by Erika Kirk's speech.

Forgive them Father?!


are you fucking shitting me?

Sit down with that nonsense will you?
I can understand her speech and appreciate her obvious personal pain as she made it. She believes it, it is a part of her interpretation of the bible's teachings.

I'm an agnostic, not a devout believer. I find myself siding more with Donald Trump's take on it. Presumably your own too. The widow Kirk can find her level and honour her slain husband in the manner that makes sense to her, I am free to do what makes sense to me.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 10, 2025, 11:53:49 AM
Quote from: . on October 10, 2025, 11:48:00 AMOh absolutely. If two options include the same element in the outcome then I consider that part of it ceded territory and not worth concerning myself with it. "An eye for an eye" does dictate I find something of theirs to exact from their inventory... something that will make them think twice before they come for anything more of mine in the future.

Rolling over and taking it up the ass isn't an option... ever.

Amen brother.

Going out fighting here. The only cheek that's turning on me is the one attached to my right leg as the right foot is going up some libtard's asshole the day they try some offensive bullshit on me or someone I love.

This is why I was so thoroughly sickened by Erika Kirk's speech.

Forgive them Father?!


are you fucking shitting me?

Sit down with that nonsense will you?
Posted by .
 - October 10, 2025, 11:48:00 AM
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 10, 2025, 11:39:13 AMExactly.

the playbook couldn't be any clearer. Decay and destroy from within.

it's happening right before our eyes.

And yes, returning the favor does ensure more of it, we are in full agreement, but the puppeteers have also calculated the alternative. Doing nothing. Which is what what conservatives have done up until now.

both carry the same outcome eventually.. only difference is that one gets there a lot faster and essentially requires conservatives to die on their knees rather than on their feet

whereas I prefer to die fighting. I'm sure you do too.
Oh absolutely. If two options include the same element in the outcome then I consider that part of it ceded territory and not worth concerning myself with it. "An eye for an eye" does dictate I find something of theirs to exact from their inventory... something that will make them think twice before they come for anything more of mine in the future.

Rolling over and taking it up the ass isn't an option... ever.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 10, 2025, 11:39:13 AM
Quote from: . on October 10, 2025, 11:34:18 AMRight, and it is. It's being done to the commie animal who set the precedent.

Actually, I understand that it could have been done before, only that nobody really cared to. Regardless, it's a genie that's out of the bottle now. Expect it again and again going forwards.

And that, I suspect, is the whole point. I don't believe the commie animal came up with this on her own bat, I reckon someone else (likely foreign) pushed her to it, secure in the knowledge that it would open the door to further court cases and that the commie animal would very likely be one of them.

After all, when taking out a country with three co-equal branches of government, destroying one of those branches by tying it up in endless shitbaggery would seem to be a step in the right direction, no?

Exactly.

the playbook couldn't be any clearer. Decay and destroy from within.

it's happening right before our eyes.

And yes, returning the favor does ensure more of it, we are in full agreement, but the puppeteers have also calculated the alternative. Doing nothing. Which is what what conservatives have done up until now.

both carry the same outcome eventually.. only difference is that one gets there a lot faster and essentially requires conservatives to die on their knees rather than on their feet

whereas I prefer to die fighting. I'm sure you do too.
Posted by .
 - October 10, 2025, 11:34:18 AM
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 10, 2025, 11:20:47 AMI swear, the average leftist who cheered the criminality that Latisha and Engron engaged in here should be euthanized immediately

before they've had a chance to procreate and further infect  humanity with their loathsome lineage.

You dumb fucks never heard of a concept called precedent?

If they can successfully pull off this level of gross injustice on a former president billionaire who at the time had a very good chance of becoming president once again they can do it to ANYONE.
Right, and it is. It's being done to the commie animal who set the precedent.

Actually, I understand that it could have been done before, only that nobody really cared to. Regardless, it's a genie that's out of the bottle now. Expect it again and again going forwards.

And that, I suspect, is the whole point. I don't believe the commie animal came up with this on her own bat, I reckon someone else (likely foreign) pushed her to it, secure in the knowledge that it would open the door to further court cases and that the commie animal would very likely be one of them.

After all, when taking out a country with three co-equal branches of government, destroying one of those branches by tying it up in endless shitbaggery would seem to be a step in the right direction, no?
Posted by Brent
 - October 10, 2025, 11:30:22 AM
Quote from: . on October 10, 2025, 10:58:41 AMAnd wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!

That is right. She ripped off taxpayers.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 10, 2025, 11:20:47 AM
I swear, the average leftist who cheered the criminality that Latisha and Engron engaged in here should be euthanized immediately

before they've had a chance to procreate and further infect  humanity with their loathsome lineage.

You dumb fucks never heard of a concept called precedent?

If they can successfully pull off this level of gross injustice on a former president billionaire who at the time had a very good chance of becoming president once again they can do it to ANYONE.


And they will use such precedent against anyone. Rest assured.

Love him or hate him a process that deliberately broken should scare you.
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 10, 2025, 11:11:20 AM
Quote from: . on October 10, 2025, 10:58:41 AMAnd wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!


utterly amazing and outright shameless that this fucking Wookie would even suggest the US tax payer were somehow swindled during these transactions between private entities.


Deutsche bank isn't even a U.S based bank!  It is a German multinational investment bank

With a risk management department which probably eclipses the entirety of the whole trump organization in terms of total number of employees.

And her stake was that he, the junior entity in these private arraignments managed to hood wink a player of that size and this private transaction, and that such deception hurt the us taxpayer?

Is she fucking serious?

If anything. Such deception of a foreign based lender would HELP the US taxpayer as it would create jobs and generate revenue in THIS country

Good lord the idiots on the left are fucking stupid

Posted by .
 - October 10, 2025, 10:58:41 AM
Quote from: Reggie Essent on October 09, 2025, 09:14:50 PMI am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.
And wasn't hers government assistance? For a commie animal who claimed Trump's loans sourced from the private sector caused such problems for the US taxpayer, I'd imagine that her government assisted loans would be mondo-mondo problemo, no?

Ram that scepter of justice up her ax wound and make her squeal like a piggy. Then make ham sandwiches out of it and indict them too!
Posted by Biggie Smiles
 - October 09, 2025, 11:09:17 PM
Quote from: Reggie Essent on October 09, 2025, 09:14:50 PMI am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.

I have no problem whatsoever with Trump being out for revenge. Anyone that has gone through what he went through would.

and I hope he gets it to.


and as long as it's legal and on the up and up I am 100% behind him
Posted by Shen Li
 - October 09, 2025, 11:05:19 PM
Posted by Herman
 - October 09, 2025, 09:30:12 PM
Quote from: Reggie Essent on October 09, 2025, 09:14:50 PMI am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.
So do I. Settle scores. Do not let that shit happen again.
Posted by Reggie Essent
 - October 09, 2025, 09:14:50 PM
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on October 09, 2025, 07:29:36 PMI think Scott Jennings is great but why do we as conservatives always feel like we have to take the high moral ground when the scum on the left attempts to corner us with trick moral questions

the CNN scumbag pundint asks "but isn't this a case of two wrongs don't make a right"

and scott dodges

whereas  I'd be saying hell yeah, with a generous portion you fuck around and find out and a side order of "karma bitch"

Listen, I don't give a fuck if Trump is going after these people for retribution. After what they've pulled he has every right in the world to do so. The only thing I care about is that a) the evidence against them is not doctored and b) they have a fair trial.

that's it.

The prosecutorial motivation is inconsequential at this point and motive, in itself, does not change the physiology of the facts.. so you can take your line of questioning, your pitful Gotcha's and your entire gammut of bullshit and shove it right back up your ass is what I'd be saying

in fact, I PREFER a president who believes in getbacks... getbacks is the only language these cockroaches understand! for far too long we have singled that we are the sort that will turn the other cheek when they do us wrong. Where has that gotten us

now lets be the FAFO and see what fruit that yields

I am in agreement.  When they say "Trump is just getting revenge," the next question back should always be "So you admit that Trump was wronged for him to be seeking revenge then?"

But I never hear a follow-up like that.

I have no problem with vengeance for injustices done.  In fact, I applaud them.