News:

R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk!


Post reply

Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Is the "D" in Django silent? Yes or No? (must be lower case):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Thiel
 - Today at 02:48:21 PM
Quote from: JOE on October 14, 2025, 08:56:37 PMwasn't 1 pipeline enough avatar_DKG DKG?

Seems a better route would be a pipeline to Churchill Manitoba where the locals there are ready and willing to accept one.

Why do they need another pipeline thru BC?

Should send the LNG & Oil east to Europe where the Europeans are screaming for Canadian natural gas and oil so they can be less dependent on the middle east Russia and China.

Europe wants to build stronger ties with Canada. That's Canada should send its oil & gas.

Even our Prime Minister avatar_Mark Carney Carney agrees with that strategy,  DKG!
Sweetie, I explained you last night after you performed oral on me that Canada needs pipelines to all directions to reach all markets.

A route thru Northern BC would be the shortest route to Asian markets like Japan, Korea and China which are anxious to buy more Canadian crude. That route is the most economical and and it would produce the least amount of C02 emissions.

A pipeline to Hudson Bay is illogical. To export to the Europeans the best way would be a pipeline to the St. Lawrence River and then by tanker to Europe.

Understand now Sweetie why limiting energy exports is a stupid Carney Liberal Party policy that should be scrapped or do you need to drop to your knees first?

Posted by Shen Li
 - October 14, 2025, 10:07:26 PM
Quote from: Herman on October 14, 2025, 09:06:20 PMPrairie independence isn't radical.
Paying 50% taxes for policies that destroy our provinces is.
Quote from: Herman on October 14, 2025, 08:46:24 PMSaskatchewan too.

I understand. It's not working.

If the priaries leave, Canada is finished. They can't survive without their cash cows.

Whatever you do, dump the CDN peso and use the US greenback.
Posted by Herman
 - October 14, 2025, 09:06:20 PM
Prairie independence isn't radical.
Paying 50% taxes for policies that destroy our provinces is.
Posted by JOE
 - October 14, 2025, 08:56:37 PM
Quote from: DKG on October 08, 2025, 04:49:09 PMBritish Columbia's New Democratic Premier David Eby is playing with constitutional fire by stubbornly refusing a pipeline through his province to allow Alberta to export its oil and gas resources to the coast.

As well, federal Energy Minister Tim Hodgson indicated recently that the federal government has no plans to repeal 2019 legislation that bans tankers carrying large oil cargoes from the northern B.C. coast.

So much for Team Canada. As soon as it became inconvenient, Eby couldn't put his leftwing elbows down fast enough.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said recently her government will pitch the feds on a new bitumen pipeline to the B.C. coast.

Eby is fanning the flames of Alberta separatism by saying no.

Speaking on CTV's Power Play, Smith pointed out that if her province can't get their major export to foreign markets through Canada, they'll be forced to look south to the U.S. For those interpreting that as a threat, she pointed out she's visiting premiers across the country, selling  Alberta's case.

"There is no universe where Alberta will tolerate being landlocked in our own country by our neighbouring province, especially when the same industry he continues to demonize has generated so much wealth for his province and the country," Smith said on X.

Eby is fanning the flames of separation with his petulant inability to seek common ground with his neighbouring province.

It's one thing when a neighbouring country threatens the Canadian economy with punishing taxes. It's quite another when a neighbouring province, that's supposed to be working with you within Confederation, does everything it can to thwart your economy, your lifeblood and your ambitions.

wasn't 1 pipeline enough avatar_DKG DKG?

Seems a better route would be a pipeline to Churchill Manitoba where the locals there are ready and willing to accept one.

Why do they need another pipeline thru BC?

Should send the LNG & Oil east to Europe where the Europeans are screaming for Canadian natural gas and oil so they can be less dependent on the middle east Russia and China.

Europe wants to build stronger ties with Canada. That's Canada should send its oil & gas.

Even our Prime Minister avatar_Mark Carney Carney agrees with that strategy,  DKG!
Posted by Herman
 - October 14, 2025, 08:46:24 PM
Saskatchewan too.
Posted by Herman
 - October 11, 2025, 08:50:29 PM
Every great nation began with people who said enough. For Alberta and Saskatchewan, that moment has come.
Posted by DKG
 - October 08, 2025, 04:49:09 PM
British Columbia's New Democratic Premier David Eby is playing with constitutional fire by stubbornly refusing a pipeline through his province to allow Alberta to export its oil and gas resources to the coast.

As well, federal Energy Minister Tim Hodgson indicated recently that the federal government has no plans to repeal 2019 legislation that bans tankers carrying large oil cargoes from the northern B.C. coast.

So much for Team Canada. As soon as it became inconvenient, Eby couldn't put his leftwing elbows down fast enough.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith said recently her government will pitch the feds on a new bitumen pipeline to the B.C. coast.

Eby is fanning the flames of Alberta separatism by saying no.

Speaking on CTV's Power Play, Smith pointed out that if her province can't get their major export to foreign markets through Canada, they'll be forced to look south to the U.S. For those interpreting that as a threat, she pointed out she's visiting premiers across the country, selling  Alberta's case.

"There is no universe where Alberta will tolerate being landlocked in our own country by our neighbouring province, especially when the same industry he continues to demonize has generated so much wealth for his province and the country," Smith said on X.

Eby is fanning the flames of separation with his petulant inability to seek common ground with his neighbouring province.

It's one thing when a neighbouring country threatens the Canadian economy with punishing taxes. It's quite another when a neighbouring province, that's supposed to be working with you within Confederation, does everything it can to thwart your economy, your lifeblood and your ambitions.
Posted by Herman
 - October 05, 2025, 07:21:37 PM
Not China, not Russia or Saudi Arabia or any other country that produces oil, only Alberta is ruining the environment of the whole plane.
Again, the sort of thing why we pariarie folk want our own nation.
Posted by Herman
 - October 04, 2025, 07:46:02 PM
That aint happening to our new prairie republic.
Posted by DKG
 - October 04, 2025, 05:20:37 AM
Quote from: Herman on October 03, 2025, 09:36:52 PMTake a stand and say no to prairie transfers Yeves.

Quebec imports millions of barrels each year of American and conflict oil by pipeline and tankers.
Posted by Shen Li
 - October 03, 2025, 10:26:34 PM
Canada is sinking. However the prairies don't have to go down with the ship.
Posted by Herman
 - October 03, 2025, 09:36:52 PM
Take a stand and say no to prairie transfers Yeves.
Posted by Herman
 - October 03, 2025, 09:02:17 PM
Quote from: Shen Li on October 02, 2025, 10:18:52 PMPremier Danielle Smith is pissing up a rope.

There is not going to be another oil pipeline to tide water in Canada. I live in a city state where financing of major energy projects gets approval and no major players are going to invest in Canada as long as the Liberals are in power and keep the anti-energy laws in place. The investment and jobs will go to the US and other locations. It's that simple.
That gal keeps begging the Liberals for her province's prosperity and they keep saying no. What is her end game? Because nothing will ever change as long as the Liberals are in power and she is getting dang close to an end game.
Posted by Brent
 - October 03, 2025, 11:52:19 AM
Quote from: Shen Li on October 02, 2025, 10:18:52 PMPremier Danielle Smith is pissing up a rope.

There is not going to be another oil pipeline to tide water in Canada. I live in a city state where financing of major energy projects gets approval and no major players are going to invest in Canada as long as the Liberals are in power and keep the anti-energy laws in place. The investment and jobs will go to the US and other locations. It's that simple.
I read something about a potential pipeline between Alberta and Churchill, Manitoba. That will not be a replacement for a pipeline to the BC coast.

Posted by Shen Li
 - October 02, 2025, 10:18:52 PM
Quote from: Herman on October 02, 2025, 09:26:45 PMDanielle Smith never gives up, but this ain't going anywhere as long as the Liberals are in power.

Premier Danielle Smith is pissing up a rope.

There is not going to be another oil pipeline to tide water in Canada. I live in a city state where financing of major energy projects gets approval and no major players are going to invest in Canada as long as the Liberals are in power and keep the anti-energy laws in place. The investment and jobs will go to the US and other locations. It's that simple.