News:
R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk!
- Welcome to THeBlueCashew.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 03:05:08 PMQuote from: wizer on Today at 01:24:36 PMI'm sure it's true. AI does a great job of debunking every single one of your posts.
Best get to testing the travel time of oil from the bottom of the ocean!
Posted by wizer
- Today at 01:24:36 PMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 01:16:24 PMGet to it then! Lemme know how it works out.
BTW, A.I. sez:
Steam vent temperatures in the Gulf of California can reach up to 287°C (\(549\degree F\)) or potentially higher, though they vary depending on the specific vent field. For example, vents in the Pescadero Basin have been measured at up to \(291\degree C\) (\(556\degree F\)). These temperatures are high, but the water does not boil due to the extreme pressure at the seafloor depth
I'm sure it's true. AI does a great job of debunking every single one of your posts.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 01:16:24 PMQuote from: wizer on Today at 01:14:02 PMCompared to everything else you post, that makes the most sense.
Get to it then! Lemme know how it works out.
BTW, A.I. sez:
Steam vent temperatures in the Gulf of California can reach up to 287°C (\(549\degree F\)) or potentially higher, though they vary depending on the specific vent field. For example, vents in the Pescadero Basin have been measured at up to \(291\degree C\) (\(556\degree F\)). These temperatures are high, but the water does not boil due to the extreme pressure at the seafloor depth
Posted by wizer
- Today at 01:14:02 PMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 01:12:43 PMrent a diving bell and release some colored veggie oil at the bottom of the Gulf, then time its ascent.
Compared to everything else you post, that makes the most sense.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 01:12:43 PMQuote from: wizer on Today at 12:43:23 PMYou wrote "Meanwhile, light sweet crude is forming and bubbling up in the Gulf of California daily."
So what exactly did you intend to write? It's forming but not daily but it's bubbling daily"?
And now it's Texas and not California?
Why didn't you write that in the first place?
Do you see what I mean about your posts being unclear?
All YOU need worry about is it doesnt take millions of years for oil to form.
If you're still tore up about it, rent a diving bell and release some colored veggie oil at the bottom of the Gulf, then time its ascent.
Posted by wizer
- Today at 12:43:23 PMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 12:38:26 PMWUT?
Oil is created continuously at the bottom of the Gulf of California.
It is impossible to say how long it took for the oil we pump out of the ground in Texas to form.
You wrote "Meanwhile, light sweet crude is forming and bubbling up in the Gulf of California daily."
So what exactly did you intend to write? It's forming but not daily but it's bubbling daily"?
And now it's Texas and not California?
Why didn't you write that in the first place?
Do you see what I mean about your posts being unclear?
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 12:38:26 PMQuote from: wizer on Today at 11:25:16 AMIf it's impossible to prove that oil is created in a day from the bottom of the Gulf of California then why do you keep saying oil is created in a day at the bottom of the Gulf of California?
WUT?
Oil is created continuously at the bottom of the Gulf of California.
It is impossible to say how long it took for the oil we pump out of the ground in Texas to form.
It is very possible that it took a very short time for old oil deposits to form because we can see that oil is produced quickly at the bottom of the Gulf of California.
Millions of years are not required for oil to be created.
Posted by wizer
- Today at 11:25:16 AMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 11:23:47 AMIts impossible to prove one way or the other as nobody can take measurements from 1 million BC. However, its a fact that oil forms in much less than a year under the conditions mentioned at the bottom of the Gulf of California.
If it's impossible to prove that oil is created in a day from the bottom of the Gulf of California then why do you keep saying oil is created in a day at the bottom of the Gulf of California?
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 11:23:47 AMQuote from: wizer on Today at 11:21:35 AMI'm sure that's true.
That doesn't mean the oil that's bubbling was formed that same day or even in the past week as you seem to imply.
Its impossible to prove one way or the other as nobody can take measurements from 1 million BC. However, its a fact that oil forms in much less than a year under the conditions mentioned at the bottom of the Gulf of California.
Posted by wizer
- Today at 11:21:35 AMQuote from: Lokmar on Today at 11:13:11 AMMeanwhile, light sweet crude is forming and bubbling up in the Gulf of California daily.
I'm sure that's true.
That doesn't mean the oil that's bubbling was formed that same day or even in the past week as you seem to imply.
Posted by Lokmar
- Today at 11:13:11 AMQuote from: wizer on Today at 01:45:36 AMSuggestion: Rather than mindlessly believing something to be true just because an executive of an oil company says it is, because doing so clearly is of benefit to the stockholders of that company, due some research before blindly regurgitating questionable statements that can easily be disputed by the facts.
No clue where you live but here on earth it sure does.
Meanwhile, light sweet crude is forming and bubbling up in the Gulf of California daily.
Posted by wizer
- Today at 01:45:36 AMQuote from: Shen Li on November 05, 2025, 11:24:52 PMEngineering and Technology Magazine reported this week that BP — the company that once wanted to be known as "Beyond Petroleum" rather than "British Petroleum" — is saying "the world is no longer at risk of running out of resources."
A BP official told the magazine that "energy resources are plentiful.
Suggestion: Rather than mindlessly believing something to be true just because an executive of an oil company says it is, because doing so clearly is of benefit to the stockholders of that company, due some research before blindly regurgitating questionable statements that can easily be disputed by the facts.
Quote from: Lokmar on November 05, 2025, 09:24:06 AMThe formation of oil in nature DOES NOT take millions of years.
No clue where you live but here on earth it sure does.
Posted by Shen Li
- November 05, 2025, 11:24:52 PMQuote from: Lokmar on November 05, 2025, 09:24:06 AMThe formation of oil in nature DOES NOT take millions of years. Hydrothermal vents in The Gulf of California interact with kelp producing light sweet crude. This oil floats to the surface continuously. Sure, a lot of the oil we pump from the ground may have been trapped for millions of years but it was produced in a very short time.Engineering and Technology Magazine reported this week that BP — the company that once wanted to be known as "Beyond Petroleum" rather than "British Petroleum" — is saying "the world is no longer at risk of running out of resources."
What this means for humans is we can produce oil from biomass easily. Ethanol from grass and corn has been in production for more than 20 years. I use E-85 in my cars and cut the cats off them because they're no longer needed.
A BP official told the magazine that "energy resources are plentiful. Concerns over running out of oil and gas have disappeared."
Things are so good, in fact, that Engineering and Technology says "with the use of the innovative technologies, available fossil fuel resources could increase from the current 2.9 trillion barrels of oil equivalent to 4.8 trillion by 2050, which is almost twice as much as the projected global demand." That number could even reach 7.5 trillion barrels if technology and exploration techniques advance even faster.
This information backs up the idea that Earth is actually an oil-producing machine. We call energy sources such as crude oil and natural gas fossil fuels based on the assumption that they are the products of decaying organisms, maybe even dinosaurs themselves. But the label is a misnomer. Research from the last decade found that hydrocarbons are synthesized abiotically.
Posted by DKG
- November 05, 2025, 09:57:17 AMQuote from: Shen Li on November 05, 2025, 01:07:23 AMwizer my friend, the stone age didn't end because the earth ran out of rocks.That is true. And their are hydrocarbons on other planets where there was no marine sediment. But, the easily accessed hydrocarbons come from algae and plankton.
I hate the term fossil fuels because it is so misleading. However, they are renewable just not at the current rate of consumption. Actually natural gas is. That we have an inexhaustible supply that can be scaled up or down and requires nothing close to the land disturbance that diffuse energy sources like wind and solar do.
Peak demand is a possibility. Particularly since Western countries have become so efficient in their use of oil derivatives.
Peak oil on the other hand dates all the way back to the 1880s. Repeated predictions of peak oil supply have repeatedly been moved further into the future. Soviet oil exploration adopted the abiotic oil theory—the idea that hydrocarbons are generated by inorganic processes in the Earth's mantle, not from decomposed biological material.
The Soviets didn't just theorise, they acted. They developed deep-drilling programs that tapped into oil fields far below what traditional fossil theories considered viable. The results?
Dnieper-Donets Basin: Considered geologically "sterile," this Ukrainian site was one of the Soviet Union's most productive oil regions, reaching depths of 6–8 km.
White Tiger Field, Vietnam: Discovered by Soviet engineers, this offshore field also defied fossil logic by producing oil from granite basement rock, far below sedimentary layers typically associated with fossil fuels.
The strongest challenge to peak oil comes not from theory, but from the earth itself.
Eugene Island 330: Replenishing rates were so bizarre that the U.S. Department of Energy funded multiple studies. MIT's Jean Laherrère remarked that the field "appeared to be refilling from somewhere below."
LaBarge Field, Wyoming: Produces oil, gas, and helium—another deep-earth marker. The gases are geochemically traced to mantle origins.
Kola Superdeep Borehole: Although no oil was struck directly, the borehole encountered unexpected water and hydrocarbons at depths where life should not have existed. It confirmed that deep Earth chemistry is far more complex—and fertile—than fossil logic suggests.
If oil is being formed in the mantle and slowly migrating upward, then the question isn't whether oil is running out—it's how much is being created and how fast.
Petroleum products have provided for so many advances besides energy. From agriculture to medicine to engineering to even music. They even play a role in mitigating any potential climate change impacts. It is so essential to an advanced way of life. Nobody seriously thinks we can find an organic resource or create one that could match it's many uses.
What I don't get is if you are concerned about supplies going forward why would you want to replace an energy source you think is running out with something that is more finite than oil and natural gas. You do know wind and solar use a lot of natural resources that actually are finite?
It is true that wind solar and electric vehicles are the least sustainable energy and transportation sources.
Posted by DKG
- November 05, 2025, 09:54:53 AMQuote from: Lokmar on November 05, 2025, 09:24:06 AMThe formation of oil in nature DOES NOT take millions of years. Hydrothermal vents in The Gulf of California interact with kelp producing light sweet crude. This oil floats to the surface continuously. Sure, a lot of the oil we pump from the ground may have been trapped for millions of years but it was produced in a very short time.We will never run out of hydrocarbons. Technology has debunked that myth.
What this means for humans is we can produce oil from biomass easily. Ethanol from grass and corn has been in production for more than 20 years. I use E-85 in my cars and cut the cats off them because they're no longer needed.