News:

R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk!


Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning - while you were reading a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
spell bacon backwards with the first letter capitalized:
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Is Alticus a dick sucking fairy? (answer is opposite of no):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Brent
 - Today at 02:50:29 PM
Quote from: wizer on Today at 12:05:32 PMI checked. I quoted the correct member.

If you mean the one on the previous page he never mentioned "increased levels of atmospheric hydrocarbons."
Posted by Thiel
 - Today at 01:31:46 PM
Jo Jo and I are very happy that we will never exhaust oil supplies. That means there will be no rationing of lube for future generations.
Posted by Thiel
 - Today at 01:30:17 PM
Quote from: Lokmar on Today at 12:05:09 PMI got a buddy that runs his diesel vehicles off french fry oil. He can only use french fry oil thats millions of years old tho!  :crampe:  :crampe:  :crampe:

Sorry, couldnt resist!
Isn't most french fry oil millions of years old.
Posted by wizer
 - Today at 12:05:32 PM
Quote from: Brent on Today at 12:01:17 PMDid he? I thought he was referring to accessing new reserves.

I think you are confusing who posted what.

I checked. I quoted the correct member.
Posted by Lokmar
 - Today at 12:05:09 PM
I got a buddy that runs his diesel vehicles off french fry oil. He can only use french fry oil thats millions of years old tho!  :crampe:  :crampe:  :crampe:

Sorry, couldnt resist!
Posted by Brent
 - Today at 12:01:17 PM
Quote from: wizer on Today at 07:53:09 AMIt's odd that you confuse the terms "increased global supply of hydrocarbons" with "increased atmospheric levels of hydrocarbons".

Did he? I thought he was referring to accessing new reserves.

I think you are confusing who posted what.
Posted by Lokmar
 - Today at 11:54:49 AM
Quote from: wizer on Today at 04:16:35 AMI just can't. I'm saying the rest of this post to myself, no one else needs to read it, just scroll right on past.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

U apparently arent about looking in the mirror.
Posted by wizer
 - Today at 07:53:09 AM
Quote from: DKG on Today at 07:50:57 AMIt is odd that people are not excited that the global supply of hydrocarbons is increasing. But, they have an agenda and apparently it does not include a stable cheap supply of energy.

It's odd that you confuse the terms "increased global supply of hydrocarbons" with "increased atmospheric levels of hydrocarbons".
Posted by DKG
 - Today at 07:50:57 AM
Quote from: wizer on Today at 07:47:14 AMWhat an odd statement.

It is odd that people are not excited that the global supply of hydrocarbons is increasing. But, they have an agenda and apparently it does not include a stable cheap supply of energy.
Posted by wizer
 - Today at 07:47:14 AM
Quote from: DKG on Today at 07:43:53 AMSome people are angry that we will never exhaust hydrocarbon supplies.

What an odd statement.
Posted by DKG
 - Today at 07:43:53 AM
Quote from: Lokmar on Today at 02:14:17 AMYep. Its not much more complicated than pressing out olive oil. Some people are hyper invested loons tho.
Some people are angry that we will never exhaust hydrocarbon supplies. It is responsible for our modern advanced way of life more than all other natural resources combined. It makes no sense unless you have an agenda.
Posted by wizer
 - Today at 04:16:35 AM
Quote from: Lokmar on Today at 02:14:17 AMIts not much more complicated than pressing out olive oil.   

I just can't. I'm saying the rest of this post to myself, no one else needs to read it, just scroll right on past.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.

I'm not here to argue with idiots.
Posted by Lokmar
 - Today at 02:14:17 AM
Quote from: Shen Li on November 06, 2025, 11:12:37 PMLok we have the technology right now to produce crude oil from algae in about an hour.

The entire process is surprisingly straightforward. A mixture of wet algae, water, and other materials is subjected to a temperature of 350°C and a pressure of 20 MPa for nearly 60 minutes, resulting in the production of combustible hydrocarbons.

This process mimics some of the conditions that originally transformed prehistoric plant material into fossil fuels deep underground – high pressure and temperatures.

But, with the world awash in hydrocarbons it will not happen on any industrial scale.

Yep. Its not much more complicated than pressing out olive oil. Some people are hyper invested loons tho.
Posted by Shen Li
 - Today at 12:02:00 AM
Quote from: wizer on November 06, 2025, 11:55:43 PMWe have the technology to travel right now to Mars.

Safe travels.

Not analogous. We don't already have Mars here on earth.
Posted by wizer
 - November 06, 2025, 11:55:43 PM
Quote from: Shen Li on November 06, 2025, 11:12:37 PMLok we have the technology right now to produce crude oil from algae in about an hour.

We have the technology to travel right now to Mars.

Safe travels.