News:
R.I.P to the great Charlie Kirk! ~ R.I.P to our friend Caskur!
- Welcome to THeBlueCashew.
Posted by Brent
- Today at 01:24:43 PMLiberal Party members are gathering in Montreal this week for their convention, and their eyes are aimed at doubling down on speech censorship.
As if censoring religious texts from Bill C-9 was not already enough for them, they want even more control over what we can see, say and share online.
As if censoring religious texts from Bill C-9 was not already enough for them, they want even more control over what we can see, say and share online.
Posted by Herman
- April 09, 2026, 07:32:09 PM
Posted by Herman
- April 09, 2026, 07:28:16 PM
Posted by Herman
- April 09, 2026, 07:14:41 PMThe Liberal government's Heritage propagandists have produced a draft that systematically elevates behaviours and identities it wants Canadians to support and even esteem, while airbrushing out the histories and figures it wants us to forget. These would be the people whose accomplishments reveal by comparison today's Liberals as the pitifully inadequate charlatans they are.
It does, after all, take an entirely different skill set to knock a country down than it does to build one up.
One in ten federal historical plaques from the past century is now slated for rewriting or removal because they mention John A. Macdonald or smack of "colonial legacy." Residential school figures, major political leaders, even the word "Eskimo" on old plaques, gone. Cabinet orders demand a review of anything that fails the test of "confronting colonialism, patriarchy, and racism." Public "controversy" and indigenous consultants decide what stays. The message is clear: the Canada that built railways, fought wars, and confronted its own sins is an embarrassment to be memory holed.
Canada Day grants follow the same cynical script.
"Roughly three-quarters of the $25.5 million handed out annually now go to events that have quietly dropped the flag," the anthem and any whiff of national pride. Organizers who want taxpayer cash must "evolve" their celebrations to focus on reconciliation and equity communities. No Canadian flag? No problem. Anti-colonial lectures? Approved. This government has decided that honouring the country that funds them is passé; dividing it into grievance groups is progressive.
It does, after all, take an entirely different skill set to knock a country down than it does to build one up.
One in ten federal historical plaques from the past century is now slated for rewriting or removal because they mention John A. Macdonald or smack of "colonial legacy." Residential school figures, major political leaders, even the word "Eskimo" on old plaques, gone. Cabinet orders demand a review of anything that fails the test of "confronting colonialism, patriarchy, and racism." Public "controversy" and indigenous consultants decide what stays. The message is clear: the Canada that built railways, fought wars, and confronted its own sins is an embarrassment to be memory holed.
Canada Day grants follow the same cynical script.
"Roughly three-quarters of the $25.5 million handed out annually now go to events that have quietly dropped the flag," the anthem and any whiff of national pride. Organizers who want taxpayer cash must "evolve" their celebrations to focus on reconciliation and equity communities. No Canadian flag? No problem. Anti-colonial lectures? Approved. This government has decided that honouring the country that funds them is passé; dividing it into grievance groups is progressive.
Posted by DKG
- April 09, 2026, 08:18:26 AMMark Carney and corrupt members of parliament are making a mockery of Canadian democracy.
Here is former Liberal MP Dan McTeague on the sad state of affairs under the current Liberals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqYyk-gNVfg
Here is former Liberal MP Dan McTeague on the sad state of affairs under the current Liberals.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqYyk-gNVfg
Posted by Shen Li
- April 08, 2026, 10:17:55 PM^
Your vote doesn't matter. It doesn't mean anything at all. Democracy in Canada is a lie.
Your vote doesn't matter. It doesn't mean anything at all. Democracy in Canada is a lie.
Posted by Herman
- April 08, 2026, 06:46:29 PMIt's true. Liberal Bill C-9 actually could send you to JAIL if you quote the Bible in a way they don't like.
Carney Liberal cabinet minister Marc Miller even said so himself, because he says the Bible can be used to spread "hatred."
Which is very strange, since BILLIONS of Christians around the world find the Bible a source of absolute love.
So why are the Liberals coming after it?
Carney Liberal cabinet minister Marc Miller even said so himself, because he says the Bible can be used to spread "hatred."
Which is very strange, since BILLIONS of Christians around the world find the Bible a source of absolute love.
So why are the Liberals coming after it?
Posted by Herman
- April 07, 2026, 05:09:05 PMDid you ever think you'd see the day where we had a prime minister who was even LESS transparent than Justin Trudeau?
Posted by DKG
- April 07, 2026, 08:19:25 AMThe federal by-election candidates' debate was held in Scarborough Southwest last Thursday.
That riding is up for grabs on April 13 after MP Bill Blair resigned to take a new plum gig as Canada's High Commissioner to the U.K.
What I saw there was astonishing, to say the least.
Only left-leaning candidates were allowed to fully participate. The Conservatives, People's Party of Canada, and independents were either absent or restricted to brief opening statements. That left the Liberals, NDP, and Greens to dominate the discussion.
That riding is up for grabs on April 13 after MP Bill Blair resigned to take a new plum gig as Canada's High Commissioner to the U.K.
What I saw there was astonishing, to say the least.
Only left-leaning candidates were allowed to fully participate. The Conservatives, People's Party of Canada, and independents were either absent or restricted to brief opening statements. That left the Liberals, NDP, and Greens to dominate the discussion.
Posted by Herman
- March 29, 2026, 07:39:54 PMThis is how it starts.
Not with tanks.
Not with soldiers.
With words on paper that sound "reasonable."
Bill C-9.
Most people haven't even heard of it yet.
And that's exactly the problem.
Here's the simple version.
This bill changes the Criminal Code to go after "hate."
New offences.
New definitions.
More power to prosecute.
Less protection for you.
Sounds good on the surface.
Until you actually read it.
Because once you do, you realize this isn't about stopping violence.
We already have laws for that.
This is about controlling what you can say, where you can stand, and what someone else is allowed to feel about it.
And that's where things get dangerous.
Let's break it down.
The bill creates new crimes for things like "intimidation" and "interfering with access" to certain places.
Churches.
Schools.
Community centres.
Even cemeteries.
Again, sounds fine.
Until you realize how vague it is.
"Provoking a state of fear."
That's the line.
Not violence.
Not threats.
Fear.
Think about that.
Fear is subjective.
What scares one person is nothing to another.
Which means your intent doesn't matter nearly as much as how someone else decides to interpret it.
Now layer in the other big change.
They removed a long-standing protection for religious expression.
Gone.
That means quoting scripture.
Teaching traditional beliefs.
Speaking openly about morality.
All of that now sits in a gray zone.
If someone claims it crosses into "hatred," you're no longer clearly protected.
Let that sink in.
For decades, there was a safeguard.
Now it's gone.
Here are the kinds of scenarios people are raising.
A pastor reads a passage from the Bible about sexuality.
Someone reports it.
Now it's not a theological discussion.
It's potentially a criminal investigation.
A group holds a peaceful prayer vigil outside a school.
No blocking.
No yelling.
Just standing there.
But someone says they felt intimidated.
Now it's up to the system to decide if that crosses the line.
A protest happens near a community center.
No violence.
Just signs and opinions.
But if someone says it made them feel unsafe entering the building...
That could trigger charges.
Even symbols.
Wearing something.
Posting something.
Sharing a meme.
If it's interpreted as promoting hatred...
Now you're explaining yourself to the courts.
And here's the part nobody wants to talk about.
The threshold to bring these cases gets easier.
Less oversight.
More discretion.
Which means more room for interpretation.
More room for bias.
More room for misuse.
And once that door opens, it doesn't close.
Now here's the part I've seen with my own eyes.
I grew up in Canada.
I built a life there.
And over time, something shifted.
People got softer.
Easier to offend.
More focused on how they feel than on what's actually true.
It turned into a culture where feelings started outweighing facts.
Where being uncomfortable became the same thing as being harmed.
And once that line gets blurred...
Everything becomes a problem.
Most people don't even realize it's happening.
They think they're being compassionate.
But what's really happening is we're lowering the bar for what counts as "harm."
And once everything feels like harm...
Everything becomes punishable.
There's a saying I keep coming back to.
Hard times create strong men.
Strong men create good times.
Good times create weak men.
Weak men create hard times.
Look around.
We're deep into the "good times created weak people" phase.
And now we're writing laws to protect feelings instead of freedoms.
That's not progress.
That's regression.
Supporters will say this is about protecting people.
And nobody is arguing against safety.
But we already have laws for violence, threats, harassment.
We don't need vague laws that blur the line between harm and disagreement.
Because once disagreement becomes dangerous...
Freedom is already gone.
Canada used to pride itself on being a free society.
You could speak.
Debate.
Disagree.
Now?
We're heading toward a place where the question isn't "Is this legal?"
It's "Will someone interpret this the wrong way?"
That's not freedom.
That's walking on eggshells in your own country.
And here's the hard truth.
Once you give the government this kind of power...
You don't get it back.
Doesn't matter who's in charge.
Because the next group will use it too.
Stronger.
Further.
Worse.
This bill hasn't fully passed yet.
There's still time.
But not if people stay asleep.
Not if people assume "this won't affect me."
It always does.
Maybe not today.
Maybe not tomorrow.
But eventually.
This is one of those moments.
Pay attention.
Because this isn't about hate.
It's about control.
And once that line is crossed...
Good luck getting it back.
Not with tanks.
Not with soldiers.
With words on paper that sound "reasonable."
Bill C-9.
Most people haven't even heard of it yet.
And that's exactly the problem.
Here's the simple version.
This bill changes the Criminal Code to go after "hate."
New offences.
New definitions.
More power to prosecute.
Less protection for you.
Sounds good on the surface.
Until you actually read it.
Because once you do, you realize this isn't about stopping violence.
We already have laws for that.
This is about controlling what you can say, where you can stand, and what someone else is allowed to feel about it.
And that's where things get dangerous.
Let's break it down.
The bill creates new crimes for things like "intimidation" and "interfering with access" to certain places.
Churches.
Schools.
Community centres.
Even cemeteries.
Again, sounds fine.
Until you realize how vague it is.
"Provoking a state of fear."
That's the line.
Not violence.
Not threats.
Fear.
Think about that.
Fear is subjective.
What scares one person is nothing to another.
Which means your intent doesn't matter nearly as much as how someone else decides to interpret it.
Now layer in the other big change.
They removed a long-standing protection for religious expression.
Gone.
That means quoting scripture.
Teaching traditional beliefs.
Speaking openly about morality.
All of that now sits in a gray zone.
If someone claims it crosses into "hatred," you're no longer clearly protected.
Let that sink in.
For decades, there was a safeguard.
Now it's gone.
Here are the kinds of scenarios people are raising.
A pastor reads a passage from the Bible about sexuality.
Someone reports it.
Now it's not a theological discussion.
It's potentially a criminal investigation.
A group holds a peaceful prayer vigil outside a school.
No blocking.
No yelling.
Just standing there.
But someone says they felt intimidated.
Now it's up to the system to decide if that crosses the line.
A protest happens near a community center.
No violence.
Just signs and opinions.
But if someone says it made them feel unsafe entering the building...
That could trigger charges.
Even symbols.
Wearing something.
Posting something.
Sharing a meme.
If it's interpreted as promoting hatred...
Now you're explaining yourself to the courts.
And here's the part nobody wants to talk about.
The threshold to bring these cases gets easier.
Less oversight.
More discretion.
Which means more room for interpretation.
More room for bias.
More room for misuse.
And once that door opens, it doesn't close.
Now here's the part I've seen with my own eyes.
I grew up in Canada.
I built a life there.
And over time, something shifted.
People got softer.
Easier to offend.
More focused on how they feel than on what's actually true.
It turned into a culture where feelings started outweighing facts.
Where being uncomfortable became the same thing as being harmed.
And once that line gets blurred...
Everything becomes a problem.
Most people don't even realize it's happening.
They think they're being compassionate.
But what's really happening is we're lowering the bar for what counts as "harm."
And once everything feels like harm...
Everything becomes punishable.
There's a saying I keep coming back to.
Hard times create strong men.
Strong men create good times.
Good times create weak men.
Weak men create hard times.
Look around.
We're deep into the "good times created weak people" phase.
And now we're writing laws to protect feelings instead of freedoms.
That's not progress.
That's regression.
Supporters will say this is about protecting people.
And nobody is arguing against safety.
But we already have laws for violence, threats, harassment.
We don't need vague laws that blur the line between harm and disagreement.
Because once disagreement becomes dangerous...
Freedom is already gone.
Canada used to pride itself on being a free society.
You could speak.
Debate.
Disagree.
Now?
We're heading toward a place where the question isn't "Is this legal?"
It's "Will someone interpret this the wrong way?"
That's not freedom.
That's walking on eggshells in your own country.
And here's the hard truth.
Once you give the government this kind of power...
You don't get it back.
Doesn't matter who's in charge.
Because the next group will use it too.
Stronger.
Further.
Worse.
This bill hasn't fully passed yet.
There's still time.
But not if people stay asleep.
Not if people assume "this won't affect me."
It always does.
Maybe not today.
Maybe not tomorrow.
But eventually.
This is one of those moments.
Pay attention.
Because this isn't about hate.
It's about control.
And once that line is crossed...
Good luck getting it back.
Posted by .
- March 26, 2026, 08:47:04 PMPosted by Herman
- March 26, 2026, 03:33:24 PM
Posted by Herman
- March 25, 2026, 03:29:22 PM
Posted by Herman
- March 24, 2026, 08:31:27 PMQuote from: Lokmar on March 24, 2026, 08:02:24 PMYou need to execute your leaders.And they will be replaced just like Iran's mullahs.
We need to execute the elbows up voters.
Posted by Lokmar
- March 24, 2026, 08:02:24 PMQuote from: Herman on March 24, 2026, 06:20:25 PMThe Liberals plan to push through their censorship bill TOMORROW.
It would give them the power to JAIL Canadians just for quoting their own sacred texts.
Parents could face consequences for simply passing their beliefs on to their kids.
You need to execute your leaders.