News:

SMF - Just Installed!

 

Post reply

The message has the following error or errors that must be corrected before continuing:
Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.
Note: this post will not display until it has been approved by a moderator.
Other options
Verification:
Please leave this box empty:
Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
Is Alticus a dick sucking fairy? (answer is opposite of no):
Is the "D" in Django silent? Yes or No? (must be lower case):
911 was an attack on what city (spell out lower case two words):
Shortcuts: ALT+S post or ALT+P preview

Topic summary

Posted by Bricktop
 - February 14, 2018, 06:06:58 PM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"ac_toofunny



Typical deadbeat shitbag cop think. If it can't be proven in a court of law or logic, go for the court of opinion as proof!



 :thumbup:


I'm sorry. I'm confused here. Are we attempting to prove a crime? Is this a court of law?



As far as I know, portraying yourself as a female in a web forum, as a male, is moronic, but not criminal.



We have the word of another who spoke to you and to whom you admitted being Freud. That is more than adequate evidence these folks need to know you're an infantile little fraud.
Posted by Anonymous
 - February 14, 2018, 05:51:51 PM
Quote from: "Angry White Male"Dinky, it's time to give it up!



Just admit you are a man, most likely of Abo descent, and then just smooth the wave and ride with it...

Oh he's a man and I have met Freud/Dinky Dianna. But, he is not a boong.
Posted by Anonymous
 - February 14, 2018, 06:59:35 AM
https://s18.postimg.org/u0fxlw9tl/2018021422201899813_1518608340764.png">
Posted by Anonymous
 - February 14, 2018, 06:57:43 AM
Yayyyyyyyyyyy!!! now we cooking with fires
Posted by Frood
 - February 14, 2018, 04:30:31 AM
ac_toofunny



Typical deadbeat shitbag cop think. If it can't be proven in a court of law or logic, go for the court of opinion as proof!



 :thumbup:
Posted by Bricktop
 - February 14, 2018, 04:27:10 AM
Again, you lose.



As you know, on the internet you don't have to prove anything.



You just have to make people believe...and you have failed spectacularly.



Again.
Posted by Frood
 - February 14, 2018, 02:57:00 AM
I don't care if the Western right to remain silent has been whittled down and viewed as an indicator of guilt by lawmakers, barristers, and shit for brains cops.



You make the accusations, the onus is on you to prove them beyond a shadow of a doubt. My job is to do whatever I care to as I have no involvement with your ridiculousness and paranoia.



Ultimately you can't prove anything you've maintained so that makes you the loser (besides your general loserness of course).  ac_hithere
Posted by Bricktop
 - February 14, 2018, 02:30:11 AM
Quote from: "Dinky Dianna"


Silence is not proof.


For one who has much to say about law and order, you know very little about the evidentiary value of "silence". Things have changed much.



"People will be warned that they may risk harming their defence in court if they refuse to give police information about a crime under proposed new laws.



The caution police now give is: "You are not obliged to say or do anything unless you wish to do so, but whatever you say or do may be used in evidence. Do you understand?"



This will be changed to: "You are not obliged to say or do anything unless you wish to do so. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something you later rely on in court. Anything you do say and do may be given in evidence. Do you understand?"



Thus, if you decline to answer the question, you essentially forfeit the defence you try to raise in court.



Put another way, the court may now INFER from your refusal to offer a response that you are concealing evidence.



So, is RW lying when she states you admitted to her you are Freud in another alter, and that your presence here is intended to be an irritant specifically targetted at me?



THAT'S how it works, chump.
Posted by Frood
 - February 14, 2018, 02:19:10 AM
That would be false and dishonest of me. I'm not a liar or cop.
Posted by Angry White Male
 - February 14, 2018, 02:16:26 AM
Dinky, it's time to give it up!



Just admit you are a man, most likely of Abo descent, and then just smooth the wave and ride with it...
Posted by Frood
 - February 14, 2018, 02:06:17 AM
Quote from: "Bricktop"Evidence; first hand knowledge, articles and implements relative to the crime, or circumstantial evidence that corroborates a fact.



RW stated privately and in the forum that you spoke with her on Skype after the group chat, and admitted being Freud, and that your presence was some infantile attempt to antagonise me.



Is she lying?


Accusation are not proof.


Quote from: "Bricktop"Silence is telling...


Silence is not proof.





See how it works, dumb dumb?
Posted by Bricktop
 - February 14, 2018, 12:18:21 AM
Silence is telling...
Posted by Bricktop
 - February 13, 2018, 10:57:41 PM
Evidence; first hand knowledge, articles and implements relative to the crime, or circumstantial evidence that corroborates a fact.



RW stated privately and in the forum that you spoke with her on Skype after the group chat, and admitted being Freud, and that your presence was some infantile attempt to antagonise me.



Is she lying?
Posted by Frood
 - February 13, 2018, 09:05:08 PM
You confuse accusations with evidence, you befuddled old tosser.
Posted by Bricktop
 - February 13, 2018, 08:50:33 PM
Mmmm....need that memory checked.



I provided clear evidence. I asked you direct questions based on factual reports.



You ignored it.



This troll is boring as fuck.