SMF - Just Installed!
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on April 29, 2025, 01:11:07 PMwhy are we placating mental and moral decay instead of addressing it with the proper response.
all throughout humanity there were simply those who should not be allowed to continue on this earth.
The cannanites
the sick fuckers in Sodom and Gomorrah
the cockroaches of Noah's day
you know what? Fuck it, I'm not even going to pretend anymore. exterminate these fucking twisted fucking reprobates.
these animals on the left want to cry about free speech when some cockroach who is inciting violence at tax payer funded universities is restrained from doing so?
while at the same time depriving a Christian baker in Colorado his right to worship his God in the manner he sees fit which ONLY involves NOT using his talents to foster mental illness?
cry me a river... you fuckers need to go. It's the only way civilization can survive
I used to have a much more middle of the road attitude on this. Ie if some whack job wants to pretend he's a woman so what? But now I've seen that if you give evil an inch before you know it it will be up your arm and in your ass.
fuck that. rid society of this scourge already
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on April 29, 2025, 01:59:51 PMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wjtHzTAUoIThat asshole shares George Soros' penchant for wearing scrotums under his eyes.
Quote from: Lokmar on April 29, 2025, 12:54:18 PMI finally finished watching the last part of this a minute ago. God should obliterate America for having that tranny filth in government. That shit infuriates me like you cant believe.
Quote from: Biggie Smiles on April 28, 2025, 08:27:14 PMmaybe you haven't heard but Trump was impeached today
and no... the clown you see filing the articles of impeachment is NOT part of an SNL skit
this is real![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMF8vnKtiHQ
Quote from: King Raho on April 29, 2025, 11:10:39 AMIt's been said that communists hate America. Let's assume that is genuinely the case for the purpose of argument.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
Quote from: King Raho on April 29, 2025, 11:55:07 AMRand Paul did disappoint, I will admit. If he were representing the libtards, they'd be screaming about primarying him the minute he showed any divergence from the party line.
Quote from: King Raho on April 29, 2025, 11:10:39 AMIt's been said that communists hate America. Let's assume that is genuinely the case for the purpose of argument.
It has also been said they will employ useful idiots to make this happen, then toss the useful idiots to the kerb once they've outlived the usefulness. Let us assume this too to be the case.
I mean it shouldn't be a stretch to accept some of these assumptions; take for instance the New York case that was brought against Trump. Now the person that brought it is being hoist by her own petard. And yes, I'm sure there are plenty of people here saing "well hell, suck shit biotch, this is the precedent you yourself set and... hahah, it turns out you are guilty of it." Poetic justice as it were... and the powerbrokers that contrived to market her to a position where she could go after Trump in the first place do not seem to be doing an awful lot to run cover for her.
My question (and I invite anyone here to answer and/or debate it) is this; are we not watching the establishment of a bunch of precedents aimed specifically at jamming the workings of the US legal system? I'd argue that it is already overburdened with unnecessary regulation, and these pricks are adding more of it. While we ourselves cheer as their footsoldiers succumb to the very laws they themselves made happen.
Remember, the judiciary if a coequal branch of the US government. So if some commie bastard can force it to break under its own weight, we would have been effectively cheering their incremental successes in weakening the country.
Quote from: Frood on April 29, 2025, 10:26:09 AMThey try it again and the US is likely to have a civil war.I don't think Dems are tired of it.
People are tired of the lawfare, lies, and obstructionists.
Quote from: DKG on April 29, 2025, 10:01:02 AMImpeaching the president will be the Dems' top priority if they win back the House and they probably will.
Page created in 0.854 seconds with 26 queries.