Quote from: Thiel on May 25, 2025, 01:26:15 PMKevin O'Leary who knows Mr Trump personally says the president wants a North American version of the EU with the Canadian and American economies fully integrated. This would mean free movement of labor and it would prevent Ottawa or the provinces blocking energy pipelines.

Um.

I don't know if the EU's example is something to aspire to, not with France and Germany doing much of the heavy lifting while countries like Greece mooch off the common wealth.

Quote from: Thiel on May 25, 2025, 01:26:15 PMKevin O'Leary who knows Mr Trump personally says the president wants a North American version of the EU with the Canadian and American economies fully integrated. This would mean free movement of labor and it would prevent Ottawa or the provinces blocking energy pipelines.

Throw in scrapping the Canadian currency for the US dollar and I would go to the embassy and vote yes if it was a referendum question.

An analysis of oil tanker activity in British Columbia by the Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) suggests the Trans Mountain Pipeline ran close to full capacity during the month of April.
RBC analysts said 28 tankers departed from the Westridge Marine Terminal in Burnaby last month.
"Tanker volumes in April would suggest to us that the Trans Mountain Pipeline (TMPL) could have run above contracted capacity rates of 712,000 bbl/d, making use of spot ability," the note says.
The pipeline has a total capacity of 890,000 barrels per day, with 712,000 barrels reserved for firm service. RBC said it estimates that approximately 30 tanker loadings would represent full utilization of the pipeline's capacity.
The bank, using a proprietary tool to track tankers, identified the export markets for Canadian crude in April. California was noted as receiving 115 shipments, for approximately 38.1 million barrels. Tankers also brought oil from Trans Mountain to Alaska and Washington state.
Asia was also the end destination of multiple oil shipments, with China receiving the bulk. China received 80 shipments from Canada, South Korea four, and Japan two. The Southeast Asian nations of Brunei and Indonesia received a shipment each.

Quote from: Shen Li on May 25, 2025, 01:41:58 AMWhen I lived in Canada, I wanted the country to pull it's head out it's ass. Approve and build pipelines, mines and LNG export facilities. But Canada isn't a normal country as we can see from the pipeline circus.

Canada wants to be poor dysfunctional and authoritarian. I don't live there anymore and I never will again, so I hope they get their wish.

I just want Alberta using the greenback. Even if they settle for economic union with the US while maintaining some link to Canada, I would be happy as long as they dump the Canadian peso.

Kevin O'Leary who knows Mr Trump personally says the president wants a North American version of the EU with the Canadian and American economies fully integrated. This would mean free movement of labor and it would prevent Ottawa or the provinces blocking energy pipelines.

Quote from: Thiel on May 24, 2025, 11:43:19 AMSweetie, I explained to you after you gave me oral sex this morning that the courts denied BC from blocking the TMX. BC never "allowed it" Pussycat. And what do you mean a second pipeline to Prince Rupert. That is the shortest route to Asia, and there is not a first one.

The governments of Japan, Taiwan, China, South Korea and India all want your country's crude oil but they have been blocked by Mr Trudeau's Bills C-48 and C-69. Hundreds of billions of dollars in investments and government revenues not to mention tens of thousands of jobs gone in two votes It makes no sense and it is causing your country to break up.

They want Canada's LNG for sure too, but they really want Canadian crude. Those Asian countries made the case to build a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert not the Premier of Alberta.

An Energy East pipeline makes sense too, but it does not have countries begging Canada to build it and sign delivery contracts like one to Prince Rupert does.

Do you understand why a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert should be the first infrastructure priority Sugar Buns or do we have jump in the sack first?

When I lived in Canada, I wanted the country to pull it's head out it's ass. Approve and build pipelines, mines and LNG export facilities. But Canada isn't a normal country as we can see from the pipeline circus.

Canada wants to be poor dysfunctional and authoritarian. I don't live there anymore and I never will again, so I hope they get their wish.

I just want Alberta using the greenback. Even if they settle for economic union with the US while maintaining some link to Canada, I would be happy as long as they dump the Canadian peso.

Quote from: Thiel on May 24, 2025, 11:43:19 AMSweetie, I explained to you after you gave me oral sex this morning that the courts denied BC from blocking the TMX. BC never "allowed it" Pussycat. And what do you mean a second pipeline to Prince Rupert. That is the shortest route to Asia, and there is not a first one.

The governments of Japan, Taiwan, China, South Korea and India all want your country's crude oil but they have been blocked by Mr Trudeau's Bills C-48 and C-69. Hundreds of billions of dollars in investments and government revenues not to mention tens of thousands of jobs gone in two votes It makes no sense and it is causing your country to break up.

Eight to ten days to South Korea and Japan and on to the east coast of India with all the other nations in between.

The biggest refinery of heavy oil is in India.

Four South Korean refineries have already received shipment of Trans Mountain heavy oil. They like it and they want more of the shit too. But dickheads like Eby and Conman Carney's crew would rather see the end of Canada than approve jobs building infrastructure.

Quote from: Thiel on May 24, 2025, 11:43:19 AMSweetie, I explained to you after you gave me oral sex this morning that the courts denied BC from blocking the TMX. BC never "allowed it" Pussycat. And what do you mean a second pipeline to Prince Rupert. That is the shortest route to Asia, and there is not a first one.

The governments of Japan, Taiwan, China, South Korea and India all want your country's crude oil but they have been blocked by Mr Trudeau's Bills C-48 and C-69. Hundreds of billions of dollars in investments and government revenues not to mention tens of thousands of jobs gone in two votes It makes no sense and it is causing your country to break up.

They want Canada's LNG for sure too, but they really want Canadian crude. Those Asian countries made the case to build a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert not the Premier of Alberta.

An Energy East pipeline makes sense too, but it does not have countries begging Canada to build it and sign delivery contracts like one to Prince Rupert does.

Do you understand why a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert should be the first infrastructure priority Sugar Buns or do we have jump in the sack first?

That was John Horgan who fought Transmountain and Northern Gateway. That fake socialist is dead now.

Quote from: JOE on May 23, 2025, 10:59:08 PMAnd yet BC allowed the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline Shen Li Shen

I don't think Smith has made a case that Canada needs a 2nd oil pipeline to Prince Rupert.

Perhaps a better business case might be LNG. That's more likely where the demand will be.

Canada needs an Energy East corridor to ship gas & possibly oil to Europe. But the main obstacle are Nationalist parties in Quebec. The current premier Francois Legault stated that he is open to a pipeline through Northern Quebec.

Sweetie, I explained to you after you gave me oral sex this morning that the courts denied BC from blocking the TMX. BC never "allowed it" Pussycat. And what do you mean a second pipeline to Prince Rupert. That is the shortest route to Asia, and there is not a first one.

The governments of Japan, Taiwan, China, South Korea and India all want your country's crude oil but they have been blocked by Mr Trudeau's Bills C-48 and C-69. Hundreds of billions of dollars in investments and government revenues not to mention tens of thousands of jobs gone in two votes It makes no sense and it is causing your country to break up.

They want Canada's LNG for sure too, but they really want Canadian crude. Those Asian countries made the case to build a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert not the Premier of Alberta.

An Energy East pipeline makes sense too, but it does not have countries begging Canada to build it and sign delivery contracts like one to Prince Rupert does.

Do you understand why a crude pipeline to Prince Rupert should be the first infrastructure priority Sugar Buns or do we have jump in the sack first?

Quote from: Shen Li on May 23, 2025, 08:31:53 PMNo other country with sub-soveign governments would tolerate the kind of disunity that that Edy asshole is doing.

It's no wonder Canada is broke, has declining living standards and people that can are emigrating.

I assume you meant Eby and not Edy or Eddie.

Quote from: Shen Li on May 23, 2025, 08:31:53 PMNo other country with sub-soveign governments would tolerate the kind of disunity that that Edy asshole is doing.

It's no wonder Canada is broke, has declining living standards and people that can are emigrating.

And yet BC allowed the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline Shen Li Shen

I don't think Smith has made a case that Canada needs a 2nd oil pipeline to Prince Rupert.

Perhaps a better business case might be LNG. That's more likely where the demand will be.

Canada needs an Energy East corridor to ship gas & possibly oil to Europe. But the main obstacle are Nationalist parties in Quebec. The current premier Francois Legault stated that he is open to a pipeline through Northern Quebec.

No other country with sub-soveign governments would tolerate the kind of disunity that that Edy asshole is doing.

It's no wonder Canada is broke, has declining living standards and people that can are emigrating.

Quote from: Eddie the chug on May 23, 2025, 02:41:59 PMDavid Eby opposes a new pipeline to Prince Rupert and supports a tanker ban. A pipeline to Prince Rupert and lifting Trudeau's tanker ban will boost Canada's economy and unify the nation. He is the real threat to national unity not Danielle Smith and Scott Moe.

How would he like it if the prairie provinces blocked BC goods from reaching Central Canada.

What did you expect from the No Development Party you dumb Chug.

David Eby opposes a new pipeline to Prince Rupert and supports a tanker ban. A pipeline to Prince Rupert and lifting Trudeau's tanker ban will boost Canada's economy and unify the nation. He is the real threat to national unity not Danielle Smith and Scott Moe.

How would he like it if the prairie provinces blocked BC goods from reaching Central Canada.