Carney has one talent: wasting money that aint his.

MAJOR BREAKING - MASSIVE LIBERAL BOONDOGLE!
The PBO has determined that Carney's "War-time building program"
at a cost of 38 BILLION dollars
will generate only 3.7% of the required 690,000 homes!
Only 25,000 units will be built over 5 years!! Thats $1.5M per UNIT!!

If we want to see investment come back to Canada, the performative and silly tanker ban needs to go.
We've banned ourselves from an international shipping lane. International tankers will still come through the same waters carrying oil.
But it won't be Canadian.

Mark Carney has broken every single promise he made just seven short months ago.

He promised to spend less; he's spending $90 billion more.

He promised to lower the debt-to-GDP ratio; he raised it, and inflation along with it.

He also promised that he would invest more; his own budget shows we'll see private sector business investment collapse.

And he promised he would get us a deal with the Americans; instead, we got "who cares?"

He promised to drastically cut the number of temporary foreign workers but he increased it.

Well, on behalf of all the Canadians who can no longer afford to eat, heat or house themselves, we the people care.

His big projects MPO are all smoke and mirrors just like the elbows up scam.

A big project gone that would have created hundreds, possibly thousands of good jobs and revenue. It is gone now to Trump's investor friendly United States.

Nutrien's U.S. port project shows Carney's MPO more about politics than results

Canada is the largest potash producer in the world (about one-third of the total). Our annual potash exports are valued at around $9 billion to $11 billion and are expected to grow for the next couple of decades.

Potash is Canada's fifth-largest export commodity.

So when Nutrien, the world's largest potash mining company, based in Saskatoon, says it's looking to build a new billion-dollar export terminal, don't you think that Prime Minister Mark Carney and his vaunted Major Projects Office (MPO) would jump at the chance to help the company find a Canadian site and remove any roadblocks to the terminal's construction?

That's precisely what Carney has said his MPO is there for, over and over again.

Sure, the Nutrien terminal is not on either of Carney's first lists of "nation-building" projects, but it should be a simple add-on. It meets all the criteria. It will increase GDP. It will create jobs. And, best of all, the funding is already in place — all of it private. No government money required.

It would seem a no-brainer for the Liberal government to refer the terminal to its MPO.

However, in the spring, Nutrien even offered to build in either Vancouver or Prince George if the Carney government wanted to prove its commitment to unleashing growth in the Canadian economy and attracting investment in resource industries and critical minerals.

According to the company, the Liberals weren't interested.

Maybe because the Nutrien terminal would have been too much work for the political credit it would have earned the Liberals. Of the 10 projects announced so far by the PM, most are already through the assessment process; some are substantially underway. It easy to take credit.

Taking on a project that still needs permits and a water-access site just seems like too much work for the "stroke" it would get the Libs from voters and the media.

So, on Wednesday, Nutrien announced it would be building its terminal in Longview, Wash., just down the Columbia River from Portland, Ore.

In the end, Canada's regulations, taxes, freight rates, approval timelines and construction costs weren't competitive with those in the States.
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/lorne-gunter-nutriens-u-s-port-project-shows-carneys-mpo-more-about-politics-than-results/wcm/b743b201-e374-461c-bb99-0b787df3cb68

Quote from: Herman on November 22, 2025, 08:34:46 PMThis is what Carbey meant when he said "cuts."

Sadly, there are no cuts in this budget. I wish it was a Mellei style austerity budget with deep spending cuts combined with slashing red tape and lowering taxes. And of course repealing all the bad laws that block investment.

fter 10 years of Liberal mismanagement, Canada is stuck in a productivity crisis.

Carney's costly credit card budget offered zero solutions—adding more debt, and higher costs for Canadians.

Investors are fleeing because of high Liberal taxes, endless red tape, and anti-energy laws like C-69 and C-48 that block job-creating projects and strangle economic growth.

Canadians can't afford the cost of Carney.

This is what Carbey meant when he said "cuts."

This is the legacy that Carney will be judged on:

Fresh or frozen beef up 16.8%
Chicken up 6.2%
Seafood up 8.0%
Apples up 4.2%
Oranges up 7.2%
Fruit juice up 7.3%
Carrots up 11.0%
Coffee up 34.2%
Infant formula up 5.9%

Carney's budget added or raised:

The Liberal industrial carbon tax
The Liberal food-packaging tax
The Liberal fuel standard adding 17¢/L to gas
Inflationary Liberal deficits
600,000 refugees who should have been deported automatically given permanent residency

Here is another hidden gem in Conman Carney's war on working folks budget.

Former NHL star Theo Fleury is making headlines after sharply criticizing Conman Carney's first federal budget, using explosive language that immediately fueled national debate. In a post shared across social media, Fleury claimed that "The Communist takeover of Canada is complete."

Jo Jo and I were discussing after we had sex last night that Mr.Carney acknowledges that his party's policies make it more difficult for families to buy groceries. Spending $1 billion for a juice box and a granola bar for a few hundred thousand kids is not how a serious government makes sure school kids receive proper nutrition.

Where there's a social inequity to be solved leave money in parents' pockets. The Liberals are more likely to hew toward government programs and national strategies — even in areas of unambiguous provincial jurisdiction like schools.

There is nothing in this budget that will make life more affordable for the working class. There is more debt and more C02 costs. A typical Liberal budget just bigger.