Quote from: DKG on Today at 09:48:44 AMIf you were going to spend a bunch of money on a new car, you'd probably want some proof that it actually works first. Right?

Apparently, Ottawa believes evidence is optional when spending taxpayers' money.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation filed an access-to-information request with Public Safety Canada, the department in charge of the federal government's "gun grab" and confiscation scheme. The request simply asks for "all analysis from the department on the efficacy of the assault style firearms compensation program and its effect on crime rates/public safety."

The department advised that "no information related to your request exists within Public Safety Canada."

Let that sink in.

The federal government is asking taxpayers to pay for a program without doing any analysis about whether it will even work.

Ottawa budgeted at least $742 million for this program, with some experts saying the cost could reach up to six billion dollars. Yet the federal government can't produce a single shred of analysis showing that it will make Canadians safer, according to the request.

Anyone who registered a gun is a fukin moron. Illinois required me to register all kinds of shit. I registered ZERO!

If you were going to spend a bunch of money on a new car, you'd probably want some proof that it actually works first. Right?

Apparently, Ottawa believes evidence is optional when spending taxpayers' money.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation filed an access-to-information request with Public Safety Canada, the department in charge of the federal government's "gun grab" and confiscation scheme. The request simply asks for "all analysis from the department on the efficacy of the assault style firearms compensation program and its effect on crime rates/public safety."

The department advised that "no information related to your request exists within Public Safety Canada."

Let that sink in.

The federal government is asking taxpayers to pay for a program without doing any analysis about whether it will even work.

Ottawa budgeted at least $742 million for this program, with some experts saying the cost could reach up to six billion dollars. Yet the federal government can't produce a single shred of analysis showing that it will make Canadians safer, according to the request.

That's what Mark Carney wrote in his letter to the Globe&Mail on the subject of the Freedom Convoy BEFORE he was the PM, just as a private Ottawa citizen. (After that Canadians bank accounts were frozen.)

Carney met Alex Soros. I could imagine what evil they are planning. We are being sold out to globalists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCyPeTjmZA4

When the heck did our democracy become a co-ruling arrangement with the indigenous?

The court decision that the Independence Referendum could not go ahead without indigenous consultation effectively says that our democracy has now effectively become a co-ruling arrangement. When did that happen?

The answer is April 17, 1982. That is the day that we, the citizens of Canada, lost the right to control our own democracy. Control was handed to the judges. The judges have now determined that, despite there being no mention of co-ruling in the treaties (signed in the 1870s), it is the law.

What happened on that day? Canada became a constitutional republic, with parliamentary trappings.

Trudeau and the premiers took our basic right to determine our own future away and turned it over to the judges. The fundamental belief in equal sovereignty of all individuals (inherited in the treaties) was no longer protected by 700 years of British evolutionary democracy.

And what can we do about it? Ask another set of judges for their opinion? Right!

British Columbia faces the same issue. There, the courts have decided that land ownership as designated in the fee-simple land title structure is, in the same way, subject to co-ownership. The unprecedented ruling is leading to all non-treaty land being co-owned, on one side by the province and the person or entity identified in the land title office and whatever indigenous that claims a superior title. Those folks who were led to believe that they had sole, unfettered ownership will have a new partner if they wish to refinance and sell what they thought was their home.

Does any Liberal want to come here and explain why Canadians aren't allowed to know what goes on in the ETHICS committee?

 

Conman Carney's first order of business was to systematically move committee meetings in secret.

They want to shut down investigations, block documents from being released, and change legislation without Canadians knowing.

No public scrutiny.
No accountability.
No transparency.

They don't want you to know what is really going on.

Conman Carney is choosing control, secrecy, and backroom deals instead of being honest with Canadians.

Radical Liberal Minister Marc Miller says Canada should follow the U.K.'s censorship model: "As we see other jurisdictions like Australia, Britain, and France taking action, we need to take action as well."

Just look at what's happening in the U.K.:

UK free speech crackdown sees up to 30 people a day arrested for petty offenses such as retweets and cartoons
New York Post — Aug. 19, 2025

Father Ted creator Graham Linehan arrested over posts on transgender issues
The Guardian — Sept. 2, 2025

This is what Conman Carney wants to bring to Canada.

This is what Chretien/Martin era Liberals think of Conman Carney.

Europe is obsessed with regulating the internet, then it wonders why they have few tech companies of note.
The Liberals want to bring this model to Canada.