Most of their big donors are on both coasts and have very different interests than working class people in the centre of the country.
Dems need a message
Midterms posed bigger challenge for Democrats than Trump
Historically, midterm elections are not favourable to the White House.
In the 2014 midterms, then U.S. president Barack Obama said, "We got beat" and took full responsibility for losing control of the Senate to the Republicans.
Of course Obama is not President Donald Trump, who pretty much claimed victory after defeat in this month's midterms in which the Republicans lost control of the House of Representatives to the Democrats.
But Democrats should also realize they didn't win in the larger sense of American politics.
Last week's election was not just a vote on issues, but a referendum on Trump who, according to the Democrats, is the worst U.S. president ever.
If that's the best argument they've got to defeat him two years from now in the presidential race, they're in trouble.
No doubt the world has taken a turn for the worse in recent years, but if Democrats hope to regain power by unloading the entire responsibility on Trump, they should think again.
Trump is only part of the problem.
He won the presidency two years ago because his Democratic predecessors failed.
First Obama and then Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee, failed to address real issues bothering American voters including the threat of terrorism, domestic insecurity and a lax immigration system leading to a porous U.S. border.
Worse, they dangerously withdrew from global affairs, letting Russian president Vladimir Putin expand his influence in Ukraine and the Middle East.
Democrats might not consider terrorism, security and immigration priority concerns for most Americans, but they never developed an effective communications strategy to explain to voters what they did think was important.
They chose instead to demonize Trump for raising those concerns and the voters who were listening to him.
Clinton and the Democrats, divided and ideologically bereft of new ideas internally, radicalized the external debate, (see Clinton's infamous "basket of deplorables" referring to Trump supporters), antagonizing moderate voters and giving oxygen to extremists.
In so doing, they played into Trump's strength as a street fighter, who prefers yelling to debating and threatening to negotiating.
The Democrats insist they are nothing like Trump, but in reality, on many issues, they're behaving like Trump, demonizing anyone who supports him.
In that context, Trump's "defeat" in the midterms might turn into a Pyrrhic victory for the Democrats and help Trump to win the presidential election in two years.
Controlling the House makes the Democrats more vulnerable because they will now be part of the decision-making process and must take responsibility for the outcome.
For example, what's the Democrats' plan for the strange caravan of asylum seekers when it finally arrives at the Mexico-us border?
Will they oppose Trump's determination to keep them out?
[size=150]With their new majority in the House, will the Democrats use this opportunity to present new ideas and programs, or will they devote themselves to impeaching the president?
[/size]
This would mean more mud-slinging and extreme political views coming to the fore, welcome news for Trump because that's the political environment in which he thrives.
If that happens, it will mean the Democrats have learned nothing from the rise of Trump, which is that trying to match the American president riot for riot and scandal for scandal has taken them nowhere, having only scratched Trump in the midterms, which almost always happens to incumbent US presidents.
The Democrats need a new leader and a new strategy to take on Trump, not more mud-throwing which Trump is better at than they are.
That they don't have either to this point, is their real problem.
The American Democrats are the party of rich progs. Not the GOP is much better, but they haven't entirely thrown working people under the bus yet.
All the above highlights that modern democracy is a total catastrophe. Wherever it is practiced.
I have no faith in the system any more, and many people I know in Australia feel the same.
Adversarial politics is tearing our nations apart.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
All the above highlights that modern democracy is a total catastrophe. Wherever it is practiced.
I have no faith in the system any more, and many people I know in Australia feel the same.
Adversarial politics is tearing our nations apart.
I am not ready to throw the baby out with the bath water just yet. But, Trump's election highlighted both US parties, but especially the Democrats needs to decide what they are about.
We already know what they are about. Whatever the other guys are NOT about.
Contrariness for it's own sake is the platform of modern politics. Political power is the aim, not the greater good.
Just look at the recent US elections. It was all about "winning" and keeping "power". Opposition parties are no longer different, or misguided or wrong, they are evil.
We no longer accept the principle of majority rules...a flawed and ludicrously outdated foundation of government. We are fracturing into sub-tribes, each wanting what's best for them, and to hell with the larger population.
It is unsustainable, and there will be no soft landing, because the very people who have the power to make changes are the same who profit most from the existing chaos.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
We already know what they are about. Whatever the other guys are NOT about.
Contrariness for it's own sake is the platform of modern politics. Political power is the aim, not the greater good.
Just look at the recent US elections. It was all about "winning" and keeping "power". Opposition parties are no longer different, or misguided or wrong, they are evil.
We no longer accept the principle of majority rules...a flawed and ludicrously outdated foundation of government. We are fracturing into sub-tribes, each wanting what's best for them, and to hell with the larger population.
It is unsustainable, and there will be no soft landing, because the very people who have the power to make changes are the same who profit most from the existing chaos.
That's what I was getting at with the op. The Democrats are no longer offering the average American a clear alternative.
It is the same in every democracy.
Instead of policies, and promises rarely kept anyway, opposition parties merely focus on highlighting how evil the other side is. Australia and the UK are no different. Traditionally, during election campaigns, parties would tell the public their plans if elected.
The problem with that is that many of those plans never came to fruition, and we learned that any election promises were simply there to get as much attention as possible.
So now the campaigning is largely negative. "We are not them" is the central platform.
Our systems are not only dysfunctional, they are corrupt by definition. The entire process is controlled and choreographed by political parties, who act outside of public scrutiny and accountability.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
It is the same in every democracy.
Instead of policies, and promises rarely kept anyway, opposition parties merely focus on highlighting how evil the other side is. Australia and the UK are no different. Traditionally, during election campaigns, parties would tell the public their plans if elected.
The problem with that is that many of those plans never came to fruition, and we learned that any election promises were simply there to get as much attention as possible.
So now the campaigning is largely negative. "We are not them" is the central platform.
Our systems are not only dysfunctional, they are corrupt by definition. The entire process is controlled and choreographed by political parties, who act outside of public scrutiny and accountability.
Trump changed that. He is keeping most of his promises. And the ones he cannot are being blocked by congress.
Point well made.
As I have maintained, the real impact of Trump will not be during his tenure, but afterwards. Will his successor follow the template Trump has utilised in getting things done? Or will the Trump era be a blip on the US political radar.
Equally importantly is will Trump inspire copy cat politicians in other countries?
Quote from: "Bricktop"
Point well made.
As I have maintained, the real impact of Trump will not be during his tenure, but afterwards. Will his successor follow the template Trump has utilised in getting things done? Or will the Trump era be a blip on the US political radar.
Equally importantly is will Trump inspire copy cat politicians in other countries?
I predict he will be a blip, but more nationalists will be elected around the world.
Yet if he succeeds as a President, surely his successor would need to offer more of the same.
If you were standing for the Republicans, you would surely not say that you will be different from a successful predecessor.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Most of their big donors are on both coasts and have very different interests than working class people in the centre of the country.
My problem with the Democrats is their refusal to denounce violent organizations like Antifa and BLM.
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
I'm still waiting for Trump to make improvements to the infrastructure. He promised this during his campaign but has had not yet delivered.
It will get a LOT worse before it gets better, because political ideology has usurped the common good.
The political concept of "entryism", that is joining or embedding into institutions or organisations for subversion and improper manipulation has been carried out by the left for decades now. They have calmly and effectively inserted themselves into journalism, academia, pop culture, bureaucracy and the judiciary, wielding massive influence over the youth in particular by advocating and promoting left values as part of both "education" (or more accurately, inculcation) , "entertainment" (propaganda) and "news" (advocacy and dissent).
Dissembling these institutions to remove the bias and restore balance and fairness will be akin to turning a sweater back into a ball of wool.
In the meantime, the court system will apply leftist principles to their deliberations, primary amongst them that it is society that creates criminals by creating inequity and alienation. Put another way, it is not the fault of the criminal.
Buckle up, buckos...this is only going to get crazier.
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
I'm still waiting for Trump to make improvements to the infrastructure. He promised this during his campaign but has had not yet delivered.
That will probably be one of the few things that get done under the Democrat controlled house.
I could list a lot of things wrong with the democrat party, but it doesn't matter they will win, and everything they, and the rest of the left are doing that is bad will only get 10 times worse.
the key is immigration
Every year the US takes in 1.5 to 2 million legal and illegal immigrants. 2/3 of them vote democrat. If half of them vote, how long before democrats have a monopoly on power? it's really an easy 5th grade math problem. The answer is only a few years.
Joe's warnings are upside down. The democrats will run everything soon and they will become more extreme with every victory. A democrat monopoly will produce an increasingly totalitarian leftist society complete with more activist violence. I don't know exactly what it will look like, but it won't be pretty.
America as we know it is finished.
The world as we know it will change significantly.
Not just America.
The entire planet has been poisoned by socialism.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I could list a lot of things wrong with the democrat party, but it doesn't matter they will win, and everything they, and the rest of the left are doing that is bad will only get 10 times worse.
the key is immigration
Every year the US takes in 1.5 to 2 million legal and illegal immigrants. 2/3 of them vote democrat. If half of them vote, how long before democrats have a monopoly on power? it's really an easy 5th grade math problem. The answer is only a few years.
Joe's warnings are upside down. The democrats will run everything soon and they will become more extreme with every victory. A democrat monopoly will produce an increasingly totalitarian leftist society complete with more activist violence. I don't know exactly what it will look like, but it won't be pretty.
America as we know it is finished.
Joe knows his "warning" are upside down. If they were right side up, they would be useless troll material.
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I could list a lot of things wrong with the democrat party, but it doesn't matter they will win, and everything they, and the rest of the left are doing that is bad will only get 10 times worse.
the key is immigration
Every year the US takes in 1.5 to 2 million legal and illegal immigrants. 2/3 of them vote democrat. If half of them vote, how long before democrats have a monopoly on power? it's really an easy 5th grade math problem. The answer is only a few years.
Joe's warnings are upside down. The democrats will run everything soon and they will become more extreme with every victory. A democrat monopoly will produce an increasingly totalitarian leftist society complete with more activist violence. I don't know exactly what it will look like, but it won't be pretty.
America as we know it is finished.
Joe knows his "warning" are upside down. If they were right side up, they would be useless troll material.
Well one key measure I support are abortion and birth control.
Both appear to be what the US Republican party are against.
And I did indicate to Lump on previous occasions in the other forum that I support a change to citizenship by birthright. I think thats what Republican South Carolina senator Lindsay Graham advocates. Canada should do the same since both Britain and Australia have modified their laws to discourage birther citizenship
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "seoulbro"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
I could list a lot of things wrong with the democrat party, but it doesn't matter they will win, and everything they, and the rest of the left are doing that is bad will only get 10 times worse.
the key is immigration
Every year the US takes in 1.5 to 2 million legal and illegal immigrants. 2/3 of them vote democrat. If half of them vote, how long before democrats have a monopoly on power? it's really an easy 5th grade math problem. The answer is only a few years.
Joe's warnings are upside down. The democrats will run everything soon and they will become more extreme with every victory. A democrat monopoly will produce an increasingly totalitarian leftist society complete with more activist violence. I don't know exactly what it will look like, but it won't be pretty.
America as we know it is finished.
Joe knows his "warning" are upside down. If they were right side up, they would be useless troll material.
Well one key measure I support are abortion and birth control.
Both appear to be what the US Republican party are against.
GOP Iowa governor proposes over-the-counter birth control meds
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/412257-gop-iowa-governor-proposes-over-the-counter-birth-control-for-women
Well Joe if you get pregnant, do eet .. please
Quote from: "cc"
Well Joe if you get pregnant, do eet .. please
Well cc a 40 year old friend of mine recently knocked up his 25 year old gf.
Now he's shittin bricks tryin ta figger out how he's gonna pay for the new child.
Even if the guy doesn't carry the pregnancy he almost may as well given the financial responsibility he'll have to carry after the child comes out.
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "cc"
Well Joe if you get pregnant, do eet .. please
Well cc a 40 year old friend of mine recently knocked up his 25 year old gf.
Now he's shittin bricks tryin ta figger out how he's gonna pay for the new child.
Even if the guy doesn't carry the pregnancy he almost may as well given the financial responsibility he'll have to carry after the child comes out.
I call bullshit. You don't have a friend.
Joe's friends lol .. he just makes them up to attention whore
and as a leadin / ploy for some whacky statement he wants to make
The funny part is that he doesn't know https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4rf7bAApM4
Quote from: "cc"
Joe's friends lol .. he just makes them up to attention whore
and as a leadin / ploy for some whacky statement he wants to make
The funny part is that he doesn't know https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4rf7bAApM4
Same bullshit troll over and over again.
Quote from: "Bricktop"
The world as we know it will change significantly.
Not just America.
The entire planet has been poisoned by socialism.
I agree. America and the UK, Germany Sweden and France are the worst off, but most western countries are infected.
We all move similarly.
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Well if that's true, then the Republican Party is just as extreme as the Democrats.
This extremism manifests itself in either party trying to outspend each other.
The Republicans want unrealistic, unsustainable tax cuts to among other things, fight wars & support an ultra expensive state of the art military machine. Hey dumbos- that requires taxes just like it did during the cold war when taxation rates in the USA where over twice as high as they are today. And that was under the administration of Dwight Eisenhower when the Republicans also controlled Congress during the 1950s. Incidentally, Eisenhower produced budgetary surpluses not deficits.
The Democrats want their entitlements to among other things, fund an ultra expensive healthcare system known as Obamacare. And I agree with American tourists I spoke with....why did the damn rates keep going up? That didn't make any sense. No fee payer system should cost that much to set up and maintain. I agree there was something wrong with that system.
The bottom line is - whatever your party affiliation I think the USA spends too much and doesnt tax enough for what it wants. Hence the sky high projected trillion dollar deficits. Soon it's national debu will exceed its gdp. That is not a healthy ratio. I'd worry about the debt if I were the USA.
I'd be more concerned about bringing down the US debt than coddling spoiled pampered billionaires or accommodating gen xers who want the state to give them something for nothing.
Didn't Alexander Tytler darkly prophesize that democracy ends when it's citizens vote themselves the treasury?
Incidentally I may consider voting Conservative in Canada if Trudeau doesn't smarten up, curtail spending and bring down our debt. He promised stimulus spending to revive the economy, but now that its in full swing he oughta shut off the tap. I actually agree with Tory leader Andrew Scheer. Theres simply no need at the present moment to be running deficts. The party in power should be cutting spending and socking away surpluses now for a rainy day.
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Well if that's true, then the Republican Party is just as extreme as the Democrats.
This extremism manifests itself in either party trying to outspend each other.
The Republicans want unrealistic, unsustainable tax cuts to among other things, fight wars & support an ultra expensive state of the art military machine. Hey dumbos- that requires taxes just like it did during the cold war when taxation rates in the USA where over twice as high as they are today. And that was under the administration of Dwight Eisenhower when the Republicans also controlled Congress during the 1950s. Incidentally, Eisenhower produced budgetary surpluses not deficits.
The Democrats want their entitlements to among other things, fund an ultra expensive healthcare system known as Obamacare. And I agree with American tourists I spoke with....why did the damn rates keep going up? That didn't make any sense. No fee payer system should cost that much to set up and maintain. I agree there was something wrong with that system.
The bottom line is - whatever your party affiliation I think the USA spends too much and doesnt tax enough for what it wants. Hence the sky high projected trillion dollar deficits. Soon it's national debu will exceed its gdp. That is not a healthy ratio. I'd worry about the debt if I were the USA.
I'd be more concerned about bringing down the US debt than coddling spoiled pampered billionaires or accommodating gen xers who want the state to give them something for nothing.
Didn't Alexander Tytler darkly prophesize that democracy ends when it's citizens vote themselves the treasury?
Incidentally I may consider voting Conservative in Canada if Trudeau doesn't smarten up, curtail spending and bring down our debt. He promised stimulus spending to revive the economy, but now that its in full swing he oughta shut off the tap. I actually agree with Tory leader Andrew Scheer. Theres simply no need at the present moment to be running deficts. The party in power should be cutting spending and socking away surpluses now for a rainy day.
Read Seoul's article..
Tax cuts produced more revenue, not less and tax increases here(federally and in Alberta) did not produce the revenue we were told they would..
And you didn't read what Wazzzup wrote either.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Well if that's true, then the Republican Party is just as extreme as the Democrats.
This extremism manifests itself in either party trying to outspend each other.
The Republicans want unrealistic, unsustainable tax cuts to among other things, fight wars & support an ultra expensive state of the art military machine. Hey dumbos- that requires taxes just like it did during the cold war when taxation rates in the USA where over twice as high as they are today. And that was under the administration of Dwight Eisenhower when the Republicans also controlled Congress during the 1950s. Incidentally, Eisenhower produced budgetary surpluses not deficits.
The Democrats want their entitlements to among other things, fund an ultra expensive healthcare system known as Obamacare. And I agree with American tourists I spoke with....why did the damn rates keep going up? That didn't make any sense. No fee payer system should cost that much to set up and maintain. I agree there was something wrong with that system.
The bottom line is - whatever your party affiliation I think the USA spends too much and doesnt tax enough for what it wants. Hence the sky high projected trillion dollar deficits. Soon it's national debu will exceed its gdp. That is not a healthy ratio. I'd worry about the debt if I were the USA.
I'd be more concerned about bringing down the US debt than coddling spoiled pampered billionaires or accommodating gen xers who want the state to give them something for nothing.
Didn't Alexander Tytler darkly prophesize that democracy ends when it's citizens vote themselves the treasury?
Incidentally I may consider voting Conservative in Canada if Trudeau doesn't smarten up, curtail spending and bring down our debt. He promised stimulus spending to revive the economy, but now that its in full swing he oughta shut off the tap. I actually agree with Tory leader Andrew Scheer. Theres simply no need at the present moment to be running deficts. The party in power should be cutting spending and socking away surpluses now for a rainy day.
Read Seoul's article..
Tax cuts produced more revenue, not less and tax increases here(federally and in Alberta) did not produce the revenue we were told they would..
And you didn't read what Wazzzup wrote either.
That is the premise of Joes post-- that tax cuts are bad because they reduce federal revenues. SB debunked that entire premise before Joe even posted, but Joe never paid any attention. https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/tax-cuts-not-reduce-federal-revenues-t10059.html
Sorry Joe, but you failed again. :negative:
BTW in all joes talk about deficits he never even mentions obama, the president under which the debt grew almost as much as all 43 presidents before him combined.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Well if that's true, then the Republican Party is just as extreme as the Democrats.
This extremism manifests itself in either party trying to outspend each other.
The Republicans want unrealistic, unsustainable tax cuts to among other things, fight wars & support an ultra expensive state of the art military machine. Hey dumbos- that requires taxes just like it did during the cold war when taxation rates in the USA where over twice as high as they are today. And that was under the administration of Dwight Eisenhower when the Republicans also controlled Congress during the 1950s. Incidentally, Eisenhower produced budgetary surpluses not deficits.
The Democrats want their entitlements to among other things, fund an ultra expensive healthcare system known as Obamacare. And I agree with American tourists I spoke with....why did the damn rates keep going up? That didn't make any sense. No fee payer system should cost that much to set up and maintain. I agree there was something wrong with that system.
The bottom line is - whatever your party affiliation I think the USA spends too much and doesnt tax enough for what it wants. Hence the sky high projected trillion dollar deficits. Soon it's national debu will exceed its gdp. That is not a healthy ratio. I'd worry about the debt if I were the USA.
I'd be more concerned about bringing down the US debt than coddling spoiled pampered billionaires or accommodating gen xers who want the state to give them something for nothing.
Didn't Alexander Tytler darkly prophesize that democracy ends when it's citizens vote themselves the treasury?
Incidentally I may consider voting Conservative in Canada if Trudeau doesn't smarten up, curtail spending and bring down our debt. He promised stimulus spending to revive the economy, but now that its in full swing he oughta shut off the tap. I actually agree with Tory leader Andrew Scheer. Theres simply no need at the present moment to be running deficts. The party in power should be cutting spending and socking away surpluses now for a rainy day.
Read Seoul's article..
Tax cuts produced more revenue, not less and tax increases here(federally and in Alberta) did not produce the revenue we were told they would..
And you didn't read what Wazzzup wrote either.
That is the premise of Joes post-- that tax cuts are bad because they reduce federal revenues. SB debunked that entire premise before Joe even posted, but Joe never paid any attention. https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/tax-cuts-not-reduce-federal-revenues-t10059.html
Sorry Joe, but you failed again. :negative:
BTW in all joes talk about deficits he never even mentions obama, the president under which the debt grew almost as much as all 43 presidents before him combined.
In every one of these discussions, Joe ignores the op and posts the same thing repeatedly..
I consider it extremely rude.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "JOE"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
They are all suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome. Anyone on the left is focused on getting rid of Trump. I am looking for someone who will stand up against both parties actually to end this division. I miss the days of bipartisanship where at the end of the day, they are friends even if they have totally different agendas and from different parties. What happened to those days? What has caused all this? Is there no turning back the clock? Is it only going to get worse? It's just a shame.
Sadly, those days are long gone and it will only get worse. Because of US immigration policies the democrats pick up hundreds of thousands of new voters ever year. At this rate in 12 years or less nearly every northern state will be a deep blue, just like california, as well as some southern ones,. The democrats will have power over nearly everything. They will get more and more extreme and their antifa minions will become more violent as the dems cheer them on.
Like the saying goes-- Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Well if that's true, then the Republican Party is just as extreme as the Democrats.
This extremism manifests itself in either party trying to outspend each other.
The Republicans want unrealistic, unsustainable tax cuts to among other things, fight wars & support an ultra expensive state of the art military machine. Hey dumbos- that requires taxes just like it did during the cold war when taxation rates in the USA where over twice as high as they are today. And that was under the administration of Dwight Eisenhower when the Republicans also controlled Congress during the 1950s. Incidentally, Eisenhower produced budgetary surpluses not deficits.
The Democrats want their entitlements to among other things, fund an ultra expensive healthcare system known as Obamacare. And I agree with American tourists I spoke with....why did the damn rates keep going up? That didn't make any sense. No fee payer system should cost that much to set up and maintain. I agree there was something wrong with that system.
The bottom line is - whatever your party affiliation I think the USA spends too much and doesnt tax enough for what it wants. Hence the sky high projected trillion dollar deficits. Soon it's national debu will exceed its gdp. That is not a healthy ratio. I'd worry about the debt if I were the USA.
I'd be more concerned about bringing down the US debt than coddling spoiled pampered billionaires or accommodating gen xers who want the state to give them something for nothing.
Didn't Alexander Tytler darkly prophesize that democracy ends when it's citizens vote themselves the treasury?
Incidentally I may consider voting Conservative in Canada if Trudeau doesn't smarten up, curtail spending and bring down our debt. He promised stimulus spending to revive the economy, but now that its in full swing he oughta shut off the tap. I actually agree with Tory leader Andrew Scheer. Theres simply no need at the present moment to be running deficts. The party in power should be cutting spending and socking away surpluses now for a rainy day.
Read Seoul's article..
Tax cuts produced more revenue, not less and tax increases here(federally and in Alberta) did not produce the revenue we were told they would..
And you didn't read what Wazzzup wrote either.
That is the premise of Joes post-- that tax cuts are bad because they reduce federal revenues. SB debunked that entire premise before Joe even posted, but Joe never paid any attention. https://thebluecashew.net/the-blue-cashew-f2/tax-cuts-not-reduce-federal-revenues-t10059.html
Sorry Joe, but you failed again. :negative:
BTW in all joes talk about deficits he never even mentions obama, the president under which the debt grew almost as much as all 43 presidents before him combined.
Well Lump I support some tax cuts as economic stimulus but not if they drive up deficits.
Same with social spending.
The state treasury (including Canada's) should only dole out goodies to any special interest group for what it can afford.
While the Obama administration coddled social activists, the Trump administration coddled billionaires who simply do not need a tax cut. Worse yet its driving up the budget deficts and adding considerably to the us national debt.
That saying, I suppose my views conflict with many here.
I'm essentially a Clinton Democrat.
Fiscally conservative but socially liberal.
Thats why I somewhat like Canada's Conservative leader Andrew Scheer, because he seems socially progressive yet fiscally responsible. He's more like the leader I wish the Liberal Party had.
Trudeau isn't pragmatic enough & he's running up too much debt.
Quote from: "JOE"
Well Lump I support some tax cuts as economic stimulus but not if they drive up deficits.
Worse yet its driving up the budget deficts and adding considerably to the us national debt.
'
Well there you go again Joe . SB already showed that tax cuts did not reduce revenue. But you keep saying they did over and over. :dash1:
BTW when I said democrats are becoming increasingly extreme I was referring to taking more radical positions than before. For instance Bill Clinton supported border security, todays democrats want nothing to do with border security. Democrats never called for harassing republicans in public places before, but they are now. They were for Obamacare before now they want universal health care for all (what do you think would do to the deficit????). This is what I mean by becoming more extreme.
BTW do you know who the original tax cutter was? JFK democrat. Today's democrat party would want nothing to do with him. That's how extreme they have become.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Quote from: "JOE"
Well Lump I support some tax cuts as economic stimulus but not if they drive up deficits.
Worse yet its driving up the budget deficts and adding considerably to the us national debt.
'
Well there you go again Joe . SB already showed that tax cuts did not reduce revenue. But you keep saying they did over and over. :dash1: .
Tax cuts combined with less red tape stimulates economic growth producing more revenue, not less as we see from the US.
But, Joe didn't watch DD's climate change video on VF, he didn't read when I explained that congress not the president is responsible for spending/deficits, so it's no surprise he ignored when I debunked they myth that giving people back their own money drains federal revenue.
He ignores what I post, so I return the favour and ignore his attention whoring troll bs. He can waste someone else's time.
Helpful Hint to All:
JoeJoe is ignorable
The problem with prog parties like the US Democrats is that they are globalists. True socialists are nationalists, not globalists.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=5C87C046%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Quote from: "Fashionista"
In every one of these discussions, Joe ignores the op and posts the same thing repeatedly..
I consider it extremely rude.
I understand, Fash. Frankly, I am guilty of not reading previous posts in a thread myself especially when they are long and includes an equally long article. I simply do not have the attention span for it. What can I say, Fash? I'm an old woman.
Quote from: "@realAzhyaAryola"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
In every one of these discussions, Joe ignores the op and posts the same thing repeatedly..
I consider it extremely rude.
I understand, Fash. Frankly, I am guilty of not reading previous posts in a thread myself especially when they are long and includes an equally long article. I simply do not have the attention span for it. What can I say, Fash? I'm an old woman.
That's fair, I don't watch all videos for the same reason..
Joe is trying to be a pain in the neck to amuse himself.
Canada has no major right wing party. The political spectrum here is so narrow compared to Israel. Even Trump who is considered a right wing populist firebrand would be Likudish back in Israel.
Quote from: "Gaon"
Canada has no major right wing party. The political spectrum here is so narrow compared to Israel. Even Trump who is considered a right wing populist firebrand would be Likudish back in Israel.
So you are an immigrant?
Welcome Gaon :howdy:
----
Today's democrat party--This is what extremism looks like
Pelosi then added that people from all over have been sending her messages of thanks for "saving the country."
"Thank you for helping take back America," she said. "People all over the place are calling me, writing, in airports, here and there, saying, 'Thank you for saving America.' I give those thanks to you. Thank you for saving America. Reverend Sharpton, thank you for saving America."[/quote]
Racebaiter Sharpton used to be anathema to mainstream democrats. Now he is "saving America" :crazy: :001_rolleyes:
----
Not to be outdone in the crazy extreme department, Kamala Harris says ICE immigration agents are equivalent to the KKK :oeudC:
Harris asked Vitiello to explain why the KKK was considered a domestic terrorist group, and he answered that they used "fear and force" to influence politics based on race and ethnicity.
Harris then made a direct parallel from the KKK to the department of ICE.
"Are you aware that there's a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?" Harris asked pointedly.
"And do you see any parallels?" she asked.
Vitiello strongly rejected the comparison.[/quote]
----
This is today's democrat party, becoming more and more extreme all the time.
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Welcome Gaon :howdy:
----
Today's democrat party--This is what extremism looks like
Pelosi then added that people from all over have been sending her messages of thanks for "saving the country."
"Thank you for helping take back America," she said. "People all over the place are calling me, writing, in airports, here and there, saying, 'Thank you for saving America.' I give those thanks to you. Thank you for saving America. Reverend Sharpton, thank you for saving America."
Racebaiter Sharpton used to be anathema to mainstream democrats. Now he is "saving America" :crazy: :001_rolleyes:
----
Not to be outdone in the crazy extreme department, Kamala Harris says ICE immigration agents are equivalent to the KKK :oeudC:
Harris asked Vitiello to explain why the KKK was considered a domestic terrorist group, and he answered that they used "fear and force" to influence politics based on race and ethnicity.
Harris then made a direct parallel from the KKK to the department of ICE.
"Are you aware that there's a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?" Harris asked pointedly.
"And do you see any parallels?" she asked.
Vitiello strongly rejected the comparison.[/quote]
----
This is today's democrat party, becoming more and more extreme all the time.[/quote]
Kamala Harris might compare my brother who is an RCMP officer to the KKK.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Gaon"
Canada has no major right wing party. The political spectrum here is so narrow compared to Israel. Even Trump who is considered a right wing populist firebrand would be Likudish back in Israel.
So you are an immigrant?
Twice an immigrant; to Israel from Russia when I was a kid and to Canada in my thirties with my wife and daughter.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Welcome Gaon :howdy:
----
Today's democrat party--This is what extremism looks like
Pelosi then added that people from all over have been sending her messages of thanks for "saving the country."
"Thank you for helping take back America," she said. "People all over the place are calling me, writing, in airports, here and there, saying, 'Thank you for saving America.' I give those thanks to you. Thank you for saving America. Reverend Sharpton, thank you for saving America."
Racebaiter Sharpton used to be anathema to mainstream democrats. Now he is "saving America" :crazy: :001_rolleyes:
----
Not to be outdone in the crazy extreme department, Kamala Harris says ICE immigration agents are equivalent to the KKK :oeudC:
Harris asked Vitiello to explain why the KKK was considered a domestic terrorist group, and he answered that they used "fear and force" to influence politics based on race and ethnicity.
Harris then made a direct parallel from the KKK to the department of ICE.
"Are you aware that there's a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?" Harris asked pointedly.
"And do you see any parallels?" she asked.
Vitiello strongly rejected the comparison.
----
This is today's democrat party, becoming more and more extreme all the time.[/quote]
Kamala Harris might compare my brother who is an RCMP officer to the KKK.[/quote]
Thanks Wazzzup.
I can't stand the Democrats anymore. It's hard to say who is more extreme, Meretz or the Democrats. At least Meretz is does not control the Knesset like the Democrats do congress.
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Welcome Gaon :howdy:
----
Today's democrat party--This is what extremism looks like
Pelosi then added that people from all over have been sending her messages of thanks for "saving the country."
"Thank you for helping take back America," she said. "People all over the place are calling me, writing, in airports, here and there, saying, 'Thank you for saving America.' I give those thanks to you. Thank you for saving America. Reverend Sharpton, thank you for saving America."
Racebaiter Sharpton used to be anathema to mainstream democrats. Now he is "saving America" :crazy: :001_rolleyes:
----
Not to be outdone in the crazy extreme department, Kamala Harris says ICE immigration agents are equivalent to the KKK :oeudC:
Harris asked Vitiello to explain why the KKK was considered a domestic terrorist group, and he answered that they used "fear and force" to influence politics based on race and ethnicity.
Harris then made a direct parallel from the KKK to the department of ICE.
"Are you aware that there's a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?" Harris asked pointedly.
"And do you see any parallels?" she asked.
Vitiello strongly rejected the comparison.
----
This is today's democrat party, becoming more and more extreme all the time.[/quote]
Kamala Harris might compare my brother who is an RCMP officer to the KKK.[/quote]
Probably. She hates law enforcement and loves law breakers.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
Quote from: "Fashionista"
Quote from: "Wazzzup"
Welcome Gaon :howdy:
----
Today's democrat party--This is what extremism looks like
Pelosi then added that people from all over have been sending her messages of thanks for "saving the country."
"Thank you for helping take back America," she said. "People all over the place are calling me, writing, in airports, here and there, saying, 'Thank you for saving America.' I give those thanks to you. Thank you for saving America. Reverend Sharpton, thank you for saving America."
Racebaiter Sharpton used to be anathema to mainstream democrats. Now he is "saving America" :crazy: :001_rolleyes:
----
Not to be outdone in the crazy extreme department, Kamala Harris says ICE immigration agents are equivalent to the KKK :oeudC:
Harris asked Vitiello to explain why the KKK was considered a domestic terrorist group, and he answered that they used "fear and force" to influence politics based on race and ethnicity.
Harris then made a direct parallel from the KKK to the department of ICE.
"Are you aware that there's a perception that ICE is administering its power in a way that is causing fear and intimidation particularly among immigrants and specifically among immigrants coming from Mexico and Central America?" Harris asked pointedly.
"And do you see any parallels?" she asked.
Vitiello strongly rejected the comparison.
----
This is today's democrat party, becoming more and more extreme all the time.
Kamala Harris might compare my brother who is an RCMP officer to the KKK.[/quote]
Probably. She hates law enforcement and loves law breakers.[/quote]
A law maker is supposed to uphold the law.
Bobby and Jack Kennedy would rather by the despicable divisive language of today's Democratic Party.
By Hugh Hewitt
The party of Robert F. Kennedy is gone
In the aftermath of the murder of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968, Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, then a candidate for president, went forward with a planned rally at 17th and Broadway in the heart of Indianapolis' African American community. The country had witnessed more than 100 race riots that left at least 83 dead and 1,800 injured the previous summer, and Kennedy knew that news of King's assassination could result in similar violence. Instead, he called for "an effort to understand with compassion and love."
Kennedy's speech is rightfully hailed as one of the great moments of American political rhetoric. His plea was tragically not successful: More than 40 were killed and 2,500 injured in the riots that followed. The Democratic Convention in Chicago was a long clash between police and demonstrators. The Weathermen began their "days of rage" in 1969. The Kent State shootings shocked the nation a year later. Meanwhile, thousands of Americans died in Vietnam: 11,363 in 1967, 16,899 in 1968, 11,780 in 1969 and 6,173 in 1970.
Nevertheless, Kennedy's speech was a heartfelt, deeply moving appeal for healing and love among fellow citizens. Kennedy, who himself was killed two months later, saw all that had occurred, all that loomed and tried to stop it. Read his speech from that night in Indianapolis. Better yet, listen to it.
Then ask if you heard anything approaching that this past week from any corner of the Democratic Party. Kennedy was running for president as a Democrat, but he was very much running against President Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War. Still, he did not use the tragedy of King's murder to score points. He did not demonize his opponents in the field, Hubert Humphrey and Eugene Mccarthy, or his presumptive opponent in the fall, Richard Nixon. He didn't just speak to Democrats or some small slice of Democrats whom he considered "his base." Kennedy spoke to all Americans, especially the deeply traumatized black community, and urged peace and love and healing.
The aftermath of the El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, mass murders, both rooted in the malaise and bigotry of our online age on both the fringe left and right, did not summon forth a Kennedy. Every single Democrat missed his or her opportunity to step up, as RFK did, and instead stepped in it.
Indeed, almost all of the Democrats chose in this week following a weekend of horrors to pivot their main message of the campaign trail from "Trump and Russia" to "Trump and racism."
I discussed the actual number of "white supremacists" with Hillary Clinton on my radio show in November 2017.
"Of the 62.9 million people who voted for President Trump, do you have a number in your mind that you think are actually white nationalist racists of that 62.9 million, a real number?" I asked. "I don't think there are 100,000 in any given state. I don't think there are a half million in the United States. Do you disagree with me? Do you think there are more than a half million, you know, honest-to-god white nationalists running around the United States?"
"Probably not, no," Clinton responded. "But I think there are people who are unfortunately kind of reverting back to rather virulent attitudes about race in part because I think that it's become 'politically acceptable,' no longer politically correct to try to overcome our own feelings that often block us from seeing each other as fellow human beings. So no, the hardcore people, I agree with you, I don't think that is a very large number." Clinton was right.
I do not believe Trump is a racist, much less a white supremacist. [size=150]I think the rhetoric of the Democratic candidates is incendiary and dangerous, and also politically self- destructive. It is so absurd as to be laughable but for its repetition.
But they do not wish to argue, debate and persuade. They wish to smear and exclude, and they have exploited this shock and fear to do so. They should turn back. They should follow the example of Bobby Kennedy, as should Trump. We could all listen to Kennedy's plaintive words of 51 years ago to good effect.
I do not believe Trump is a racist, much less a white supremacist. I think the rhetoric of the Democratic candidates is incendiary and dangerous, and also politically selfdestructive. It is so absurd as to be laughable for its repetition.
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
The problem with prog parties like the US Democrats is that they are globalists. True socialists are nationalists, not globalists.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=5C87C046%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Yeah..
I dont think a true socialist would want his rights to get stomped on by bringing cheap labor from other countries.
Quote from: "Odinson"
Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
The problem with prog parties like the US Democrats is that they are globalists. True socialists are nationalists, not globalists.

(//%3C/s%3E%3CURL%20url=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%22%3E%3CLINK_TEXT%20text=%22https://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/%20...%20e=5C87C046%22%3Ehttps://scontent.fyxd1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/46095494_856066741392031_6354253056137232384_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&_nc_ht=scontent.fyxd1-1.fna&oh=03eecbc3ba71ca78efcf5896614daa53&oe=5C87C046%3C/LINK_TEXT%3E%3C/URL%3E%3Ce%3E)
Yeah..
I dont think a true socialist would want his rights to get stomped on by bringing cheap labor from other countries.
Exactly. Progs like Trudeau, AOC and Bernie Sanders are anti-socialists.
Even fellow progtards think democRAT are going too far with the divisive identity politics.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/12/vox-warren-harris-michael-brown-murder/?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=9689
Even Vox Writer Says Warren, Harris Were Wrong To Say Michael Brown Was Murdered By White Cop