Title: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 02:58:16 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 02:58:16 PM
There were 1,112 Syrian refugees resettled in the UK in the first three months of the year. The Home Office now admits that there was not a single Christian among them, Premier Christian Radio reports.Quote
The information, including the rejection of Christian applicants, came to light following a freedom of information request by the Barnabas Fund – a charity that supports persecuted Christians.
Only Muslim refugee applicants from the war-torn country have been accepted and resettled.
The statement by the charity said: "As Barnabas Fund recently reported, of the 7,060 Syrian refugees the UNHCR recommended to the UK in 2017 only 25 were Christians (0.35 per cent). However, the Home Office only accepted eleven of these – meaning that Christians made up only 0.23 per cent of Syrian refugees resettled in the UK last year."
They further explained they had to "go to considerable lengths to obtain these figures in the face of what appeared to be a sustained attempt by Home Office officials to avoid their release".
The Home Office only providing the information after the charity took the "extreme step of obtaining an order from the Information Commissioner's Office threatening the Home Office with contempt of court proceedings in the High Court".
The statement continued: "It is widely accepted that Christians, who constituted around 10 per cent of Syria's pre-war population, were specifically targeted by jihadi rebels and continue to be at risk.
As last year's statistics more than amply demonstrate, this is not a statistical blip. It shows a pattern of underrepresentation and significant prima facie evidence of discrimination that the government has a legal duty to take concrete steps to address."
A half million Syrians have been killed and 6.1 million internally displaced since the vicious war began seven years ago.
The Home Office responded to the newly revealed figures: "The vulnerable person resettlement scheme prioritises the most vulnerable refugees who have fled the Syrian conflict, regardless of race, religion or ethnicity.
"We are working with the UNHCR and other partners to reach groups that might be reluctant to register for the scheme for fear of discrimination and unaware of the options available to them."
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 04:06:55 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 04:06:55 PM
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: cc on January 01, 2019, 04:27:36 PM
Post by: cc on January 01, 2019, 04:27:36 PM
Obviously there is a deliberate plan to fill the country with islamics .. while Christians, the most in need of it, are not welcome
Canada and Western Europe is just as bad. The leadership of Western society is sick to the core
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 04:32:30 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 01, 2019, 04:32:30 PM
This whole thing has been sick from the gitgo. Those most needing refuge don't get it including also Yazidis and KurdsQuote from: "cc"
Obviously there is a deliberate plan to fill the country with islamics ..while Christians, the most in need of it, are not welcome
Canada and Western Europe is just as bad. The leadership of Western society is sick to the core
Yes.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 04:59:27 PM
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 04:59:27 PM
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: cc on January 01, 2019, 05:16:08 PM
Post by: cc on January 01, 2019, 05:16:08 PM
That explains why we have none to take
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 05:26:21 PM
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 05:26:21 PM
So that's were all the Christians have goneQuote from: "cc"
That explains why we have none to take
I never would have guessed.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Bricktop on January 01, 2019, 05:48:10 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 01, 2019, 05:48:10 PM
Does anyone still dispute that Islam is a privileged ideology/religion throughout the West.Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
I would not use Britain as a touchstone for how immigration is managed "throughout the West".
We tend to focus on basket case governments that have failed their people, like Britain, France, Germany and Sweden. Canada may be added to that list. The US has created its own problem with Mexico and countries further south.
But most "Western" nations have not followed that path. Australia, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Austria and many other nations have maintained border integrity and sensible immigration policies...some European nations in defiance of EU doctrine.
I think the UK, France and Germany are lost causes...things will only get worse, not better. But there are many nations who are putting up the No Vacancy sign and restricting the influence of muslims, either by restricting numbers or imposing legal barriers.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 05:56:31 PM
Post by: Gaon on January 01, 2019, 05:56:31 PM
Does anyone still dispute that Islam is a privileged ideology/religion throughout the West.Quote from: "iron horse jockey"
I would not use Britain as a touchstone for how immigration is managed "throughout the West".
We tend to focus on basket case governments that have failed their people, like Britain, France, Germany and Sweden. Canada may be added to that list. The US has created its own problem with Mexico and countries further south.
But most "Western" nations have not followed that path. Australia, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Austria and many other nations have maintained border integrity and sensible immigration policies...some European nations in defiance of EU doctrine.
I think the UK, France and Germany are lost causes...things will only get worse, not better. But there are many nations who are putting up the No Vacancy sign and restricting the influence of muslims, either by restricting numbers or imposing legal barriers.
Israel was heading in the direction of Germany, UK, France and Sweden. Common sense has returned.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Bricktop on January 01, 2019, 06:25:21 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 01, 2019, 06:25:21 PM
Whereas common sense on its own cannot save the UK, Germany, France and Sweden.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Berry Sweet on January 03, 2019, 05:41:50 AM
Post by: Berry Sweet on January 03, 2019, 05:41:50 AM
I'm not a fan of muslims. Majority of them seem to think their God is the one true God and everything about them is special or holy. To be a person of faith, is to accept everyone, not just your own beliefs.
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: cc on January 03, 2019, 08:15:39 AM
Post by: cc on January 03, 2019, 08:15:39 AM
We ain't seen nothin but the tip of it
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Bricktop on January 03, 2019, 05:44:02 PM
Post by: Bricktop on January 03, 2019, 05:44:02 PM
Title: Re: Britain didn’t accept a single Christian refugee, accepted Muslims only
Post by: Anonymous on January 03, 2019, 06:29:30 PM
Post by: Anonymous on January 03, 2019, 06:29:30 PM
That is usually the only part of the spear you get to see...Quote from: "Bricktop"
That is for sure.